The objective of this study was to determine the value of uterocervical angle (UCA) in predicting successful induction of labor (IOL) in singleton pregnant women compared to the Bishop score and cervical length (CL). A total of 205 normal term, singleton labor-induction cases were analyzed. Successful IOL was defined as the onset of active labor of induction. A comparative analysis was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of UCA, Bishop score, and CL in predicting IOL. Compared to the non-successful IOL group, the women in the successful IOL group had significantly wider UCA (p = 0.012) and higher Bishop score (p = 0.001); however, the CL was not significantly different (p = 0.130). UCA alone did not perform better than the Bishop score when predicting successful IOL. However, UCA combined with the Bishop score showed higher performance in predicting IOL (combined UCA > 108.4° and favorable Bishop score as sensitivity of 44.6%, specificity of 96.0%, PPV of 96.2%, and NPV of 43.6; combined UCA > 108.4° or favorable Bishop score as sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 50.0%, PPV of 78.7%, and NPV of 61.9). In conclusion, UCA combined with Bishop score may be an effective sonographic method for predicting successful IOL.

Objective: To evaluate the risks of developing gestational diabetes (GDM) and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) using data from Korea’s National Health Insurance Service. Method: The PCOS group comprised women aged 20 to 49 years diagnosed with PCOS between 1 January 2012, and 31 December 2020. The control group comprised women aged 20 to 49 years who visited medical institutions for health checkups during the same period. Women with any cancer within 180 days of the inclusion day were excluded from both the PCOS and control groups, as were women without a delivery record within 180 days after the inclusion day, as well as women who visited a medical institution more than once before the inclusion day due to hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperlipidemia, DM in pregnancy, or PIH. GDM and PIH were defined as cases with at least three visits to a medical institution with a GDM diagnostic code and a PIH diagnostic code, respectively. Results: Overall, 27,687 and 45,594 women with and without a history of PCOS experienced childbirth during the study period. GDM and PIH cases were significantly higher in the PCOS group than in the control group. When adjusted for age, SES, region, CCI, parity, multiple pregnancies, adnexal surgery, uterine leiomyoma, endometriosis, PIH, and GDM, an increased risk of GDM (OR = 1.719, 95% CI = 1.616–1.828) was observed among women with a history of PCOS. There was no increase in the risk of PIH among women with a history of PCOS (OR = 1.243, 95% CI = 0.940–1.644). Conclusion: A history of PCOS itself might increase the risk of GDM, but its relationship with PIH remains unclear. These findings would be helpful in the prenatal counseling and management of patients with PCOS-related pregnancy outcomes.

The current study aimed to investigate whether pregnancy outcomes are affected by maternal rhesus (Rh) status by comparing the primigravida pregnancy outcomes of Rh-negative women with those of Rh-positive women. The study data were collected from the Korea National Health Insurance Claims Database and the National Health Screening Program for Infants and Children. In total, 1,664,882 primigravida women who gave birth between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2014, were enrolled in this study. As the risk and severity of sensitization response increases with each subsequent pregnancy, only primigravida women were enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to Rh status, and the pregnancy outcomes were compared. In total, 1,661,320 women in the Rh-positive group and 3,290 in the Rh-negative group were assessed. With regard to adverse pregnancy outcomes, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of the prevalence of preeclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage, abruptio placenta, placenta previa, and uterine artery embolization. A univariate analysis revealed that none of the adverse pregnancy outcomes were significantly correlated to Rh status (preeclampsia: odds ratio [OR], 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.23; postpartum hemorrhage: OR, 1.10, 95% CI, 0.98-1.24; abruptio placenta: OR, 0.80, 95% CI, 0.46-1.37; and placenta previa: OR, 1.08, 95% CI, 0.78-1.42). The adjusted ORs of postpartum hemorrhage and preterm birth did not significantly differ. Maternal Rh status is not associated with adverse outcomes in primigravida women.