Third-generation mechanical analogue bone models and synthetic analogue cortical bone materials manufactured by Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc. (PRL) are popular tools for use in mechanical testing of various orthopedic implants and biomaterials. A major issue with these models is that the current third-generation epoxy–short fiberglass based composite used as the cortical bone substitute is prone to crack formation and failure in fatigue or repeated quasistatic loading of the model. The purpose of the present study was to compare the tensile and fracture mechanics properties of the current baseline (established PRL “third-generation” E-glass–fiber–epoxy) composite analogue for cortical bone to a new composite material formulation proposed for use as an enhanced fourth-generation cortical bone analogue material. Standard tensile, plane strain fracture toughness, and fatigue crack propagation rate tests were performed on both the third- and fourth-generation composite material formulations using standard ASTM test techniques. Injection molding techniques were used to create random fiber orientation in all test specimens. Standard dog-bone style tensile specimens were tested to obtain ultimate tensile strength and stiffness. Compact tension fracture toughness specimens were utilized to determine plane strain fracture toughness values. Reduced thickness compact tension specimens were also used to determine fatigue crack propagation rate behavior for the two material groups. Literature values for the same parameters for human cortical bone were compared to results from the third- and fourth-generation cortical analogue bone materials. Tensile properties of the fourth-generation material were closer to that of average human cortical bone than the third-generation material. Fracture toughness was significantly increased by 48% in the fourth-generation composite as compared to the third-generation analogue bone. The threshold stress intensity to propagate the crack was much higher for the fourth-generation material than for the third-generation composite. Even at the higher stress intensity threshold, the fatigue crack propagation rate was significantly decreased in the fourth-generation composite compared to the third-generation composite. These results indicate that the bone analogue models made from the fourth-generation analogue cortical bone material may exhibit better performance in fracture and longer fatigue lives than similar models made of third-generation analogue cortical bone material. Further fatigue testing of the new composite material in clinically relevant use of bone models is still required for verification of these results. Biomechanical test models using the superior fourth-generation cortical analogue material are currently in development.

Study Design. An in vitro biomechanical human cadaveric study of T1–T12 thoracic specimens was performed with 4 conditions (with and without rib cage, instrumented and uninstrumented) in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Objective. The objective was to understand the influence of the rib cage on motion and stiffness parameters of the human cadaveric thoracic spine. Hypotheses tested for overall motion in all modes of bending for both uninstrumented and instrumented specimens were (i) in-plane range of motion and neutral and elastic zones will be greater without the rib cage, (ii) neutral and elastic zone stiffness values will be different for specimens without the rib cage, and (iii) out-of-plane rotations will be different for specimens without the rib cage. Summary of Background Data. The rib cage is presumed to provide significant stability to the thoracic spine, but no studies have been conducted to determine the influence of the rib cage in both uninstrumented and instrumented conditions in the full thoracic human cadaveric specimens. Methods. Seven human cadaveric spine specimens (T1–T12) with 4 conditions (with and without rib cage, instrumented and uninstrumented) were subjected to 5 N·m pure moments in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Range of motion, neutral and elastic zones, neutral and elastic zone stiffness values, and out-of-plane rotations were calculated for the overall specimen. Results. In-plane range of motion was significantly higher without a rib cage for most modes of bending. Out-of-plane motions were also influenced by the rib cage. Neutral zone stiffness was significantly higher with a rib cage present. Conclusion. Testing without a rib cage yields different motion and stiffness measures, directly impacting the translation of research results to clinical interpretation. Researchers should consider these differences when evaluating the mechanical impact of surgical procedures or instrumentation in cadaveric or computational models. Level of Evidence: 5

Researchers have reported on the importance of the rib cage in maintaining mechanical stability in the thoracic spine and on the validity of a compressive follower preload. However, dynamic mechanical testing using both the rib cage and follower load has never been studied. An in vitro biomechanical study of human cadaveric thoracic specimens with rib cage intact in lateral bending, flexion/extension, and axial rotation under varying compressive follower preloads was performed. The objective was to characterize the motion and stiffness of the thoracic spine with intact rib cage and follower preload. The hypotheses tested for all modes of bending were (i) range of motion, elastic zone, and neutral zone will be reduced with a follower load, and (ii) neutral and elastic zone stiffness will be increased with a follower load. Eight human cadaveric thoracic spine specimen (T1-T12) with intact rib cage were subjected to 5Nm pure moments in lateral bending, flexion/extension, and axial rotation under follower loads of 0-400N. Range of motion, elastic and neutral zones, and elastic and neutral zone stiffness values were calculated for functional spinal units and segments within the entire thoracic section. Combined segmental range of motion decreased by an average of 34% with follower load for every mode. Application of a follower load with intact rib cage impacts the motion and stiffness of the human cadaveric thoracic spine. Researchers should consider including both aspects to better represent the physiologic implications of human motion and improve clinically relevant biomechanical thoracic spine testing.