Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder, caused by, so far, unknown pathogenetic mechanisms. There is no doubt that pro-inflammatory immune-mediated mechanisms are pivotal to the pathogenicity and progression of the disease. In this review, we highlight the binary role of microglia activation in the pathophysiology of the disorder, both neuroprotective and neuromodulatory. We present how the expression of several cytokines implicated in dopaminergic neurons (DA) degeneration could be used as biomarkers for PD. Viral infections have been studied and correlated to the disease progression, usually operating as trigger factors for the inflammatory process. The gut–brain axis and the possible contribution of the peripheral bowel inflammation to neuronal death, mainly dopaminergic neurons, seems to be a main contributor of brain neuroinflammation. The role of the immune system has also been analyzed implicating a-synuclein in the activation of innate and adaptive immunity. We also discuss therapeutic approaches concerning PD and neuroinflammation, which have been studied in experimental and in vitro models and data stemming from epidemiological studies.

Prevalence and clinical relevance of antibodies to soluble liver antigen (tRNP^(Ser)Sec/SLA) in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) have been investigated using partially purified or prokaryotically expressed antigen. The aim of this study was to improve the detection of anti-tRNP^(Ser)Sec/SLA by establishing an immunoassay that was able to identify antibodies directed to conformational epitopes and to investigate the clinical implication of this autoantibody in autoimmune liver disease. By using eukaryotically expressed tRNP^(Ser)Sec/SLA as target in a radioligand assay (RLA), 81 patients with autoimmune liver disease (AILD) (33 type 1 AIH, 31 type 2 AIH, and 17 autoimmune sclerosing cholantitis [ASC]), 147 pathologic, and 56 healthy controls were investigated. RLA results were compared with those obtained using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoblot. Reactivity to tRNP^(Ser)Sec/SLA was present in 58% of patients with type 1 and type 2 AIH, 41% with ASC, but in only 3 pathologic controls. RLA was similarly disease-specific but remarkably more sensitive than ELISA and immunoblot. A prospective study showed that anti-tRNP^(Ser)Sec/SLA-positive patients run a severe clinical course, having worse histology, needing longer to achieve remission, relapsing and requiring liver transplantation or dying more frequently than anti-tRNP^(Ser)Sec/SLA negative patients. Anti-tRNP^(Ser)Sec/SLA production was favored by the possession of DR3 and A1-B8-DR3 in AIH type 1 and ASC, and prevented by the possession of A2 in all 3 types of AILD, particularly in type 2 AIH. In conclusion, anticonformational tRNP^(Ser)Sec/SLA reactivity is frequent in type 1 and type 2 AIH and ASC, defining patients with a worse prognosis.

Numerous types of cancer have been shown to be associated with either ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. In this review, the epidemiology and pathophysiology of stroke in cancer patients is discussed, while providing vital information on the diagnosis and management of patients with cancer and stroke. Cancer may mediate stroke pathophysiology either directly or via coagulation disorders that establish a state of hypercoagulation, as well as via infections. Cancer treatment options, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery have all been shown to aggravate the risk of stroke as well. The clinical manifestation varies greatly depending upon the underlying cause; however, in general, cancer‑associated strokes tend to appear as multifocal in neuroimaging. Furthermore, several serum markers have been identified, such as high D‑Dimer levels and fibrin degradation products. Managing cancer patients with stroke is a delicate matter. The cancer should not be considered a contraindication in applying thrombolysis and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) administration, since the risk of hemorrhage in cancer patients has not been reported to be higher than that in the general population. Anticoagulation, on the contrary, should be carefully examined. Clinicians should weigh the benefits and risks of anticoagulation treatment for each patient individually; the new oral anticoagulants appear promising; however, low‑molecular‑weight heparin remains the first choice. On the whole, stroke is a serious and not a rare complication of malignancy. Clinicians should be adequately trained to handle these patients efficiently.