Christine E. Hellweg

Dr. Christine E. Hellweg

Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR) German Aerospace Center, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 September 2020 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SZShenyi Zhang
Shenyi Zhang
RWRobert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber
Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber
JYJia Yu
Jia Yu
CWChi Wang
Chi Wang
QFQiang Fu
Qiang Fu
QZQuan Zida
Quan Zida
The first measurements of the radiation dose on the lunar surface are reported in preparation for human exploration of the Moon.

19 January 2007 in The Science of Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Christine E. HellwegChristine E. Hellweg
Christine E. Hellweg
CBChrista Baumstark-Khan
Christa Baumstark-Khan

2 June 2015 in Frontiers in Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZNZacharenia Nikitaki
Zacharenia Nikitaki
Christine E. HellwegChristine E. Hellweg
Christine E. Hellweg
ALEXANDROS GEORGAKILASALEXANDROS GEORGAKILAS
ALEXANDROS GEORGAKILAS
JRJean-Luc Ravanat
Jean-Luc Ravanat
A variety of environmental stresses like chemicals, UV and ionizing radiation and organism’s endogenous processes like replication stress and metabolism can lead to the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) that can attack cellular vital components like DNA, proteins and lipid membranes. Among them, much attention has been focused on DNA since DNA damages play a role in several biological disorders and aging processes. Thus, DNA damage can be used as a biomarker in a reliable and accurate way to quantify for example radiation exposure and can indicate its possible long term effects and cancer risk. Based on the type of DNA lesions detected one can hypothesize on the most probable mechanisms involved in the formation of these lesions for example in the case of UV and ionizing radiation (e.g. X- or α-, γ-rays, energetic ions, neutrons). In this review we describe the most accepted chemical pathways for DNA damage induction and the different types of DNA lesions, i.e. single, complex DNA lesions etc. that can be used as biomarkers. We critically compare DNA damage detection methods and their limitations. In addition to such DNA damage products, we suggest possible gene inductions that can be used to characterize responses to different types of stresses i.e. radiation, oxidative and replication stress, based on bioinformatic approaches and stringent meta-analysis of literature data.

1 November 2015 in Cancer Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Christine E. HellwegChristine E. Hellweg
Christine E. Hellweg

1 February 2016 in Life Sciences in Space Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JNJohn W. Norbury
John W. Norbury
WSWalter Schimmerling
Walter Schimmerling
TSTony C. Slaba
Tony C. Slaba
EAEdouard I. Azzam
Edouard I. Azzam
FBFrancis F. Badavi
Francis F. Badavi
CZCary J. Zeitlin
Cary J. Zeitlin

25 October 2016 in Free Radical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ZNZacharenia Nikitaki
Zacharenia Nikitaki
VNVladimir Nikolov
Vladimir Nikolov
IMIfigeneia V. Mavragani
Ifigeneia V. Mavragani
EMEmil Mladenov
Emil Mladenov
AMAnastasios Mangelis
Anastasios Mangelis
ALEXANDROS GEORGAKILASALEXANDROS GEORGAKILAS
ALEXANDROS GEORGAKILAS
Detrimental effects of ionizing radiation (IR) are correlated to the varying efficiency of IR to induce complex DNA damage. A double strand break (DSB) can be considered the simpler form of complex DNA damage. These types of damage can consist of DSBs, single strand breaks (SSBs) and/or non-DSB lesions such as base damages and apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP; abasic) sites in different combinations. Enthralling theoretical (Monte Carlo simulations) and experimental evidence suggests an increase in the complexity of DNA damage and therefore repair resistance with linear energy transfer (LET). In this study, we have measured the induction and processing of DSB and non-DSB oxidative clusters using adaptations of immunofluorescence. Specifically, we applied foci colocalization approaches as the most current methodologies for the in situ detection of clustered DNA lesions in a variety of human normal (FEP18-11-T1) and cancerous cell lines of varying repair efficiency (MCF7, HepG2, A549, MO59K/J) and radiation qualities of increasing LET, that is γ-, X-rays 0.3–1 keV/μm, α-particles 116 keV/μm and 36Ar ions 270 keV/μm. Using γ-H2AX or 53BP1 foci staining as DSB probes, we calculated a DSB apparent rate of 5–16 DSBs/cell/Gy decreasing with LET. A similar trend was measured for non-DSB oxidized base lesions detected using antibodies against the human repair enzymes 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (OGG1) or AP endonuclease (APE1), that is damage foci as probes for oxidized purines or abasic sites, respectively. In addition, using colocalization parameters previously introduced by our groups, we detected an increasing clustering of damage for DSBs and non-DSBs. We also make correlations of damage complexity with the repair efficiency of each cell line and we discuss the biological importance of these new findings with regard to the severity of IR due to the complex nature of its DNA damage.