Massimo Mecella

Dr. Massimo Mecella

Dipartimento di Ingegneria informatica, automatica, e gestionale “Antonio Ruberti", Sapienza Università di Roma - Via Ariosto, 25, 00185 Roma RM, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 May 2018 in IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAdriano Augusto
Adriano Augusto
RCRaffaele Conforti
Raffaele Conforti
MDMarlon Dumas
Marlon Dumas
MRMarcello La Rosa
Marcello La Rosa
FMFabrizio Maria Maggi
Fabrizio Maria Maggi
ASAllar Soo
Allar Soo
Process mining allows analysts to exploit logs of historical executions of business processes to extract insights regarding the actual performance of these processes. One of the most widely studied process mining operations is automated process discovery. An automated process discovery method takes as input an event log, and produces as output a business process model that captures the control-flow relations between tasks that are observed in or implied by the event log. Various automated process discovery methods have been proposed in the past two decades, striking different tradeoffs between scalability, accuracy and complexity of the resulting models. However, these methods have been evaluated in an ad-hoc manner, employing different datasets, experimental setups, evaluation measures and baselines, often leading to incomparable conclusions and sometimes unreproducible results due to the use of closed datasets. This article provides a systematic review and comparative evaluation of automated process discovery methods, using an open-source benchmark and covering twelve publicly-available real-life event logs, twelve proprietary real-life event logs, and nine quality metrics. The results highlight gaps and unexplored tradeoffs in the field, including the lack of scalability of some methods and a strong divergence in their performance with respect to the different quality metrics used.

21 October 2020 in IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Magazine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CJChristian Janiesch
Christian Janiesch
AKAgnes Koschmider
Agnes Koschmider
Massimo MecellaMassimo Mecella
Massimo Mecella
BWBarbara Weber
Barbara Weber
ABAndrea Burattin
Andrea Burattin
LZLiang Zhang
Liang Zhang
The Internet of Things (IoT) refers to a network of connected devices that collects and exchanges data through the Internet. These things can be artificial or natural and interact as autonomous agents that form a complex system. In turn, business process management (BPM) was established to analyze, discover, design, implement, execute, monitor, and evolve collaborative business processes within and across organizations. While the IoT and BPM have been regarded as separate topics in research and in practice, we strongly believe that, on the one hand, the management of IoT applications will greatly benefit from BPM concepts, methods, and technologies. On the other hand, the IoT poses challenges that will require enhancements and extensions of the current state of the art in the BPM field. In this article, we question the extent to which these two paradigms can be combined, and we discuss emerging challenges and intersections from a research and practitioner's point of view in terms of complex software systems development.

1 January 2003
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
DBDaniela Berardi
Daniela Berardi
DCDiego Calvanese
Diego Calvanese
GGGiuseppe De Giacomo
Giuseppe De Giacomo
MLMaurizio Lenzerini
Maurizio Lenzerini
Massimo MecellaMassimo Mecella
Massimo Mecella

1 December 2005 in International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDaniela Berardi
Daniela Berardi
DCDiego Calvanese
Diego Calvanese
GGGiuseppe De Giacomo
Giuseppe De Giacomo
MLMaurizio Lenzerini
Maurizio Lenzerini
Massimo MecellaMassimo Mecella
Massimo Mecella

31 October 2004 in Information Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMonica Scannapieco
Monica Scannapieco
AVAntonino Virgillito
Antonino Virgillito
CMCarlo Marchetti
Carlo Marchetti
Massimo MecellaMassimo Mecella
Massimo Mecella
RBRoberto Baldoni
Roberto Baldoni

1 January 2005 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
LBLucas Bordeaux
Lucas Bordeaux
GSGwen Salaün
Gwen Salaün
DBDaniela Berardi
Daniela Berardi
Massimo MecellaMassimo Mecella
Massimo Mecella