Objectives: To compare the short-term outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (BLIF) and uniportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF). Methods: Sixty patients diagnosed with L4/5 spinal stenosis who underwent BLIF and ULIF were included (30 in each group). Clinical evaluation was performed preoperatively and postoperatively in the 1st week, 1st month, and 1st year. Factors such as the visual analogue score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), operative time, surgical complications, and radiological outcomes (fusion rate, screw loosening, and cage subsidence) were compared between the two groups. Results: All patients showed improved mean VAS and ODI at all three postoperative follow-ups, and no statistically significant differences were detected between the BLIF and ULIF groups. The mean operative time in the BLIF group was shorter than that in the ULIF group. Nerve root injury occurred in two patients in the BLIF group, while leakage of cerebrospinal fluid occurred in one patient in the ULIF group. All adverse events were treated adequately prior to discharge. The fusion rates with definite and probable grades were significantly higher in the BLIF group than that in the ULIF group. One case of cage subsidence with no screw loosening occurred in each group. Conclusion: Both BLIF and ULIF are safe and effective surgical techniques. Compared with ULIF, BLIF has the advantages of shorter operative time and a higher fusion rate. Other merits of BLIF include a wider surgical field, greater maneuverability of instruments, visibility during cage implantation, and transverse orientation of the cage.

To analyze the prognostic value of fibrinogen-albumin ratio (FAR) in predicting the overall survival in elderly osteosarcoma patients. One hundred nineteen elderly osteosarcoma patients (> 40 years old) from 2 centers were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The cutoff values of the biomarker were calculated via receiver operating characteristic curves, and the cohort was divided into high FAR group and low FAR group. The association between the FAR and clinical-pathological parameters was analyzed. And the prognosis of elderly osteosarcoma patients and the potential risk factors were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Finally, a clinical nomogram was constructed, and its predictive capacity was verified. According to receiver operating characteristic results, the cutoff value for FAR was 0.098, and the enrolled patients were divided into the low FAR group and high FAR group. The FAR was significantly correlated with several clinical-pathological characteristics, including age, tumor size, tumor stage, recurrence, and metastasis. Moreover, the multivariate Cox analyses results showed that the FAR, pathological fracture, and metastasis were independent risk factors for overall survival in elderly osteosarcoma patients. The predictive nomogram was subsequently constructed, representing satisfactory predictive performance for prognosis in elderly patients with osteosarcoma. The FAR value is a promising indicator for elderly osteosarcoma patients, which is correlated with the various clinical characteristics and prognosis. A clinical nomogram integrating FAR and other clinical indicators is a convenient and available tool to assess the prognosis and manage the individualized and precise treatment of elderly patients with osteosarcoma.

Background: Postoperative intracranial hemorrhage (PIH) is a fairly rare but catastrophic perioperative complication following lumbar spine surgery. This is a case report of a 54-year-old male patient who experienced PIH 2 h after an endoscopic L5-S1 laminectomy and discectomy. Case Presentation: A 54-year-old male patient presented with right L5-S1 radiculopathy that corresponded with the picture revealed in medical imaging and the signs seen upon physical examination. Subsequently, he underwent endoscopic L5-S1 laminectomy and discectomy. The patient presented with idiopathic unconsciousness and limb twitching 2 h after surgery. An emergency cranial CT scan was obtained which demonstrated intracranial hemorrhage. Following an emergency consultation with the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, the patient underwent an emergency interventional thrombectomy as per their orders. The surgery was performed successfully. However, the patient’s situation did not improve and he died on the second postoperative day. Conclusion: PIH after spinal endoscopic surgery is a rare but horrible complication. Several factors could lead to PIH. However, in this patient, the cause of PIH might be attributed to the long operation time combined with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. Great attention should be attached to the issue of PIH development in spinal endoscopic procedures due to constant irrigation. This study aims to highlight the issue of PIH following endoscopic spinal surgery by presenting a case report of a patient who died despite successful surgery.

(1) Background: Our team has previously introduced the Single-Step Pedicle Screw System (SSPSS), which eliminates the need for K-wires, as a safe and effective method for percutaneous minimally invasive spine (MIS) pedicle screw placement. Despite this, there are ongoing concerns about the reliability and accuracy of screw placement in MIS procedures without traditional tools like K-wires and Jamshidi needles. To address these concerns, we evaluated the accuracy of the SSPSS workflow by comparing the planned intraoperative screw trajectories with the final screw positions. Traditionally, screw placement accuracy has been assessed by grading the final screw position using postoperative CT scans. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion, using intraoperative 3D navigation for screw placement. The planned screw trajectories were saved in the navigation system during each procedure, and postoperative CT scans were used to evaluate the implanted screws. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the Gertzbein and Robbins classification scores of the planned trajectories and the final screw positions. Accuracy was defined as a final screw position matching the classification of the planned trajectory. (3) Results: Out of 206 screws, 196 (95%) were accurately placed, with no recorded complications. (4) Conclusions: The SSPSS workflow, even without K-wires and other traditional instruments, facilitates accurate and reliable pedicle screw placement.

Background/Objectives: Adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) is a spinal disease causing pain and reduced mobility, often occurring with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). While fusion stabilizes the spine, it has drawbacks like loss of motion and adjacent segment degeneration. Minimally invasive techniques, such as tubular unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (tULBD), provide a less invasive alternative, but their impact on ADS with DLSS is underexplored. This study examines the short-term effects of navigated tULBD on radiological and clinical outcomes in this patient population. Methods: This retrospective single-center study analyzed patients aged ≥18 years with DLSS and ADS (Cobb angle ≥ 10°), with or without grade I spondylolisthesis, who underwent navigated tULBD between June 2019 and October 2022. Radiological parameters were assessed pre- and post-operatively using AI-powered FXA™ Version 1.33, Raylytic Software GmbH, Leipzig, Germany, while clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for back and leg pain. Statistical analyses were conducted with R Studio. Results: This study included 20 patients (mean age 74.6 ± 7.6 years, body mass index [BMI] 26.08 ± 3.7 kg/m²), with a median follow-up of 2 months. Most underwent single-level decompression (45%), with a median of 2 surgical levels (IQR: 1–3). Radiological parameters showed no significant changes (p > 0.05). Clinically, the median NRS back improved from 5 (IQR: 3–9) preoperatively to 2 (IQR: 0–2) postoperatively (p = 0.009) and 1 (IQR: 0–4.5) at follow-up (p = 0.004). NRS leg scores dropped from 3.5 (IQR: 0–5) to 0 postoperatively and at follow-up (p = 0.02, p = 0.04). ODI improved from 37.8 (IQR: 29–42.5) preoperatively to 17.5 (IQR: 5–24) at follow-up (p = 0.04). There were no neurological complications. Conclusions: Navigated tULBD is a promising, minimally invasive option for mild ADS and DLSS. It provides significant pain and disability relief without adversely affecting stability and alignment. Long-term studies are needed to confirm durability and efficacy, particularly in severe cases.