Background: Asynchronous e-learning has become the mainstream choice since the transformation of learning formats by the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic. This scoping review aimed to examine the technologies used in asynchronous e-learning for the continuing education of clinical nurses and their modes of delivery and effectiveness. Methods: This scoping review covered the period between 2011 and 2023. Six databases were searched for relevant studies following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocol. Results: Sixty articles met the inclusion criteria. There was a noticeable trend toward using diverse technology-enabled and enhanced training (TEET) options after 2017. The enabling technological approaches, such as interactive online modules (25 articles) and video modules (25 articles), are described in the articles. The most commonly used enhancing technologies were scenario-based learning (nine articles), resource access (eight articles), computer simulation or virtual reality (three articles), and gamification (three articles). Among the outcomes, knowledge acquisition was the most commonly examined outcome (41 articles). Conclusions: Notably, many interactive TEET modules were used in asynchronous e-learning. There were few studies on gamification, computer simulation or virtual reality, and scenario-based learning (techniques to enhance intrinsic motivation further). However, the adoption of asynchronous e-learning with advanced TEET options is anticipated to increase in the future. Therefore, objective outcome measures are required to determine the effects of such learning methods on knowledge acquisition and behavioral changes.

This scoping review aims to identify the barriers in practice and clinical trials for oncology nurses in cancer cachexia. We used the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Studies written in English and published between 2008 and 2021 were retrieved from five databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. A total of 1075 studies were identified, and 34 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility by three researchers. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. This review revealed several barriers to nursing practice and clinical trials in cancer cachexia. First, health-care professionals, including nurses, faced individual barriers (insufficient understanding and skills for diagnosis and management) and environmental barriers (lack of standardized screening tools or treatment options, difficulties in collaboration with other professions, and limited human resources) in practice. Second, studies on nurse-led interventions for cancer cachexia were relatively few and different in objectives, making it challenging to integrate the outcomes. Finally, there were no established educational programs for nurses that explicitly focused on cancer cachexia. This scoping review revealed individual and environmental barriers in nursing practice. In addition, there have relatively few clinical trials involving oncology nurses in cancer cachexia. Continuing education for nurses should cover cancer cachexia to improve the quality of oncology care in the future. It is also necessary to standardize practical assessment tools that are easy to assess daily and lead to interventions and develop nurse-led multidisciplinary care.

This study aimed to identify the awareness, knowledge, and assessment of cancer cachexia among nurses who cared for patients with advanced cancer undergoing chemotherapy. In addition, we identified the factors that affected their assessments. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among nurses who cared for patients with advanced cancer undergoing chemotherapy at designated cancer care hospitals and regional cancer care cooperation hospitals between June and September 2020. We applied Bandura's triadic reciprocal causation as the research framework. The questionnaire consisted of questions on awareness, knowledge, and assessment of cancer cachexia. Single and multiple regression analyses were conducted on the relationship between each variable and the number of assessment items. Questionnaires were sent to 1026 nurses, 403 of whom responded (response rate: 39.3%). Among these, 299 responses were valid, being a 74.1% valid response rate. The average age was 39.74 ​± ​9.65 years and the mean work experience as a nurse was 16.50 ​± ​9.14 years. In respect of the awareness of cancer cachexia, 93.3% of the participants answered “assessment of cancer cachexia was needed,” and 75.2% answered “a nurse's role includes assessing for cancer cachexia.” Only 15.4% responded positively regarding “confidence in the assessment of cancer cachexia.” Regarding knowledge of cancer cachexia, the percentage of correct answers to questions about the definition of cachexia and diagnostic criteria ranged from 45.5% to 53.8%. With regard to cancer cachexia assessments, the participants assessed “weight loss or rate of weight loss (56.9%),” “symptoms affecting nutritional status (54.2%),” and “anorexia (46.2%).” Factors affecting the assessment of cancer cachexia were higher knowledge scores on cancer cachexia (P ​= ​0.039), routine assessment of cancer cachexia (P ​< ​0.001), experiences of participating in in-hospital training on cancer cachexia (P ​= ​0.027), and collaborating with physical/occupational therapists in the nutritional management of patients (P ​= ​0.025). Nurses held the view that their role required them to assess for cancer cachexia, but they did not feel confident in doing so. In addition, they lacked knowledge of reversible “cancer cachexia;” hence, the assessments were not routinely completed. Education on these topics and the development and standardization of tools to assess or collaborate with other professions are required.

Decision-making regarding end-of-life care (EOLC) place causes psychological burden on families and 70% of bereaved families have regrets. Healthcare professionals need to support families to prevent regrets. This study aims to clarify the relationship between the factors related to the decision-making methods used to choose a place of care for terminal cancer patients and the regret experienced by bereaved families. Participants were 1110 bereaved family members of patients with cancer. The questionnaire items were as follows: the agreement between patients and their families regarding their preferred place of EOLC, decision-making methods, satisfaction with the factors involved in the decision-making processes, experience regarding communication with medical personnel, and regret experienced by the bereaved families. This analysis included 332 valid responses from 343 respondents. The regret score was significantly lower for the group wherein patients and their caregivers/families had similar preferences regarding the EOLC place (P ​< ​0.001). Regret scores were significantly higher in the physician-led decision-making group (vs. positive role group P ​= ​0.004, vs. shared role group P ​= ​0.014). The regret scores for the bereaved family members were negatively correlated with the satisfaction scores for "friend support," "relationship with doctor," "information," "explanation by doctor," "thought as oneself," and "participation in the decision" (ρ ​= ​-0.207-0.400, P ​≤ ​0.001). To reduce bereaved families' regret, family members should know the patients' preferred place of EOLC, and patients and their families should be supported by physicians and nurses to understand their options and participate in the decision-making process.

Adequate knowledge of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and associated immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is essential for managing such events. However, the level of knowledge among Japanese nurses remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the current status of ICIs and irAE knowledge and the factors influencing them, among outpatient nurses caring for patients undergoing ICI treatment. An exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted at 450 facilities nationwide. Participants completed a self-administered online questionnaire consisting of three parts, measuring personal and environmental attributes and awareness and knowledge of irAEs. Questions were based on multiple literature sources and were evaluated and validated by medical oncologists and certified oncology nurses. A total of 196 (response rate: 36%) nurses responded to the survey at 109 facilities (valid responses: 192; rate: 35%). The correct response rate was 27.6% for questions on general ICI knowledge and 15.6% for general irAE knowledge. Questions on pulmonary dysfunction had the highest correct response rate (41.7%), while those on neuromuscular/joint dysfunction had the lowest (1%). The mean correct response rates were 76% for general knowledge and 48.1% for ICI-specific knowledge. Multiple regression analysis showed that the most influential factor was the participants’ study schedule (P ​< ​0.05). There is room for nurses to acquire additional knowledge about ICIs and irAEs. The use of patient education tools and a study schedule significantly increased knowledge scores. Further research is needed to identify when and how to provide nurses with opportunities to acquire additional ICI and irAE-related knowledge.

Background: No assessment tool for predicting ventilator withdrawal success is currently available in Japan. Thus, an accessible and valid assessment tool to address this issue is needed. The Burns Wean Assessment Program (BWAP) has been validated as a reliable predictor of ventilator withdrawal outcomes. However, nurses must be familiar with this tool to ensure its efficient utilization in clinical settings. Purpose: This study was designed to examine the effect of a 26-item Japanese version of BWAP (J-BWAP) e-learning materials on ventilator withdrawal in a sample of intensive care unit nurses in Japan. Methods: The BWAP was translated into Japanese, checked, and verified as the J-BWAP. Nonrandomized intensive care unit nurses from six hospitals were assigned to three groups, including Intervention Group 1 (e-learning in one session), Intervention Group 2 (e-learning over three sessions during 1 week), and the control group. The participants underwent pretests and posttests using web-based, simulated patients. The primary outcome measure was the difference in online pretest and posttest total scores among the two intervention groups and the control group. The feasibility of the J-BWAP and its e-learning materials was evaluated using four frameworks: acceptability, demand, implementation, and adaptation. Results: Of the 48 participants in the study, 32 completed the posttest and were included in the analysis (dropout rate: 33.3%). The difference between pretest and posttest scores was significantly higher in the intervention groups than the control group (2 vs. −1, p = .0191) and in Intervention Group 2 than the control group (2.0 vs. −0.5, p = .049). The feasibility frameworks for the J-BWAP and its e-learning materials were mostly positive. Conclusions/Implications for Practice: The development of the J-BWAP and training nurses using e-learning were shown to be feasible in this study. The J-BWAP contents are appropriate for predicting the outcome of mechanical ventilation withdrawal. The J-BWAP has the potential to become a common tool among Japanese medical professionals after the contents are further simplified for daily application in clinical practice. Subsequent studies should verify the reliability and validity of this tool and test the real-world utility of the J-BWAP using randomized controlled trials in Japanese clinical settings.