Joao L Saraiva

Prof. Joao L Saraiva

Fish ethology and Welfare Group - CCMAR
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 October 2017
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
RPRui Pereira
Rui Pereira
MCMarco Couto
Marco Couto
FRFrancisco Ribeiro
Francisco Ribeiro
RRRui Rua
Rui Rua
JCJácome Cunha
Jácome Cunha
Joao L SaraivaJoao L Saraiva
Joao L Saraiva

16 May 2019 in Fishes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Joao L SaraivaJoao L Saraiva
Joao L Saraiva
Pablo Arechavala-LopezPablo Arechavala-Lopez
Pablo Arechavala-Lopez
MCMaria Filipa Castanheira
Maria Filipa Castanheira
JVJenny Volstorf
Jenny Volstorf
BSBillo Heinzpeter Studer
Billo Heinzpeter Studer
Fish welfare is an essential issue that needs to be tackled by the aquaculture industry. In order to address it, studies have been limited to a small number of species and the information is generally scattered. In order to have a consistent overview of the welfare of farmed fishes, we present the FishEthoBase, an open-access database that ultimately aims to provide information on the welfare of all fish species currently farmed worldwide. Presently with 41 species, this database is directed to all stakeholders in the field and targets not only to bridge the gaps between them but also to provide scientific information to improve the welfare of fish. The current text explains the database and presents an analysis of the welfare scores of 41 species, suggesting that (i) the general welfare state of farmed fishes is poor, (ii) there is some potential for improvement and (iii) this potential is related to research on species’ needs, but (iv) there are many remaining knowledge gaps and (v) current fish farming technologies do not seem to fully address welfare issues. The existence of a framework, such as the FishEthoBase, is proposed as fundamental to the design of strategies that improve the welfare of farmed fish.

9 July 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pablo Arechavala-LopezPablo Arechavala-Lopez
Pablo Arechavala-Lopez
JCJ. C. Caballero-Froilán
J. C. Caballero-Froilán
MJM. Jiménez-García
M. Jiménez-García
XCX. Capó
X. Capó
STS. Tejada
S. Tejada
DMD. Moranta
D. Moranta
Environmental enrichment is considered as a recommended tool to guarantee or improve the welfare of captive fish. This study demonstrates for the first time that structural environmental enrichment enhances cognition, exploratory behaviour and brain physiological functions of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Seabream was reared in groups (n = 15) during 60 days under two different treatments: enriched tanks with plant-fibre ropes (EE) or bare/non-enriched tanks (NE). Fish were then exposed to a purpose-built maze for 1 h every second day in four trials. Analysis of video recordings showed that seabream under EE conditions presented higher overall exploratory behaviour, spatial orientation and learning capability compared to seabream from NE conditions. Results from brain monoamines analyses may suggest increased recent dopaminergic activity in telencephalon, known to be involved in learning processes; and increased serotonergic activity in cerebellum, involved in the coordination of balance, movements and orientation. In addition, EE-reared fish showed increased antioxidant activity in whole brain, with no apparent oxidative damage. Structural EE seemed to induce an hormetic response on juvenile seabream, improving their welfare status during captivity. Application of this kind of physical structure might be feasible at fish farms as a passive and non-invasive tool to improve welfare of intensively cultured seabream.

1 July 2014 in Molecular Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMarco Campinho
Marco Campinho
Joao L SaraivaJoao L Saraiva
Joao L Saraiva
CFClaudia Florindo
Claudia Florindo
DPDeborah Mary Power
Deborah Mary Power
Teleost eggs contain an abundant store of maternal thyroid hormones (THs), and early in zebrafish embryonic development, all the genes necessary for TH signaling are expressed. Nonetheless the function of THs in embryonic development remains elusive. To test the hypothesis that THs are fundamental for zebrafish embryonic development, an monocarboxilic transporter 8 (Mct8) knockdown strategy was deployed to prevent maternal TH uptake. Absence of maternal THs did not affect early specification of the neural epithelia but profoundly modified later dorsal specification of the brain and spinal cord as well as specific neuron differentiation. Maternal THs acted upstream of pax2a, pax7, and pax8 genes but downstream of shha and fgf8a signaling. The lack of inhibitory spinal cord interneurons and increased motoneurons in the mct8 morphants is consistent with their stiff axial body and impaired mobility. The mct8 mutations are associated with X-linked mental retardation in humans, and the cellular and molecular consequences of MCT8 knockdown during embryonic development in zebrafish provides new insight into the potential role of THs in this condition.

14 May 2016
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
RPRui Pereira
Rui Pereira
MCMarco Couto
Marco Couto
Joao L SaraivaJoao L Saraiva
Joao L Saraiva
JCJácome Cunha
Jácome Cunha
JFJoão Paulo Fernandes
João Paulo Fernandes
This paper presents a detailed study of the energy consumption of the different Java Collection Framework (JFC) implementations. For each method of an implementation in this framework, we present its energy consumption when handling different amounts of data. Knowing the greenest methods for each implementation, we present an energy optimization approach for Java programs: based on calls to JFC methods in the source code of a program, we select the greenest implementation. Finally, we present preliminary results of optimizing a set of Java programs where we obtained 6.2% energy savings.

25 July 2022 in Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Joao L SaraivaJoao L Saraiva
Joao L Saraiva
Patrícia Rachinas-LopesPatrícia Rachinas-Lopes
Patrícia Rachinas-Lopes
PAP. Arechavala-Lopez
P. Arechavala-Lopez
The effects of stocking density on fish welfare are complex and involve many interacting parameters. This complex relationship between fish welfare, stocking density and influencing factors make it challenging to define a specific optimal (“golden”) stocking density. Indeed, previously published recommendations on stocking density for different species of aquaculture interest are incredibly variable even at the same life stage, and can also vary widely within a rearing unit. Production density can be estimated quite accurately if the farmer has good biomass control and a known water volume, but it is difficult to set minimum and maximum stocking density levels that will protect welfare. However, there is little doubt that stocking densities that are too low or too high can have negative impacts on welfare and/or production. Here, we propose how to select density on captive fish and monitor its potential effects integrating 1) solid welfare assessment based on operational welfare indicators and 2) good management practices. Regulation directly limiting stocking density is likely to be unworkable and ineffective, and a more rational option might be to prescribe acceptable levels of different welfare indicators (e.g., water quality, health, nutritional condition and behavioral indicators), which together with a positive economic balance of the company, allow to estimate the most suitable range of fish density for each particular species, life-stage and production systems.