Jill Siegfried

Prof. Dr. Jill Siegfried

Professor and Head, Department of Pharmacology, Frederick and Alice Stark Endowed Chair, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2014 in Seminars in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJill Siegfried
Jill Siegfried
LSLaura P. Stabile
Laura P. Stabile

20 December 2021 in Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJill Siegfried
Jill Siegfried
Two highly prevalent pulmonary diseases, lung cancer and chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), show both sex and gender differences in their presentations and outcomes. Sex differences are defined as biological differences associated with the male vs female genotype, and gender differences are defined as behavioral or social differences that primarily arise because of gender identity. The incidence of both lung cancer and COPD has increased dramatically in women over the past 50 years, and both are associated with chronic pulmonary inflammation. Development of COPD is also a risk factor for lung cancer. In this review, the main differences in lung cancer and COPD biology observed between men and women will be summarized. Potential causative factors will be discussed, including the role of estrogen in promoting pro-growth and inflammatory phenotypes which may contribute to development of both lung cancer and COPD. Response of the innate and adaptive immune system to estrogen is a likely factor in the biology of both lung cancer and COPD. Estrogen available from synthesis by reproductive organs as well as local pulmonary estrogen synthesis may be involved in activating estrogen receptors expressed by multiple cell types in the lung. Estrogenic actions, although more pronounced in women, may also have importance in the biology of lung cancer and COPD in men. Effects of estrogen are also timing and context dependent; the multiple cell types that mediate estrogen action in the lungs may confer both positive and negative effects on disease processes.

1 August 2014 in Clinical Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMichael R Mehan
Michael R Mehan
SWStephen A Williams
Stephen A Williams
JSJill Siegfried
Jill Siegfried
WBWilliam L Bigbee
William L Bigbee
JWJoel L Weissfeld
Joel L Weissfeld
RORachel M Ostroff
Rachel M Ostroff
CT screening for lung cancer is effective in reducing mortality, but there are areas of concern, including a positive predictive value of 4% and development of interval cancers. A blood test that could manage these limitations would be useful, but development of such tests has been impaired by variations in blood collection that may lead to poor reproducibility across populations.

21 August 2018 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OMOshin Miranda
Oshin Miranda
MFMariya Farooqui
Mariya Farooqui
JSJill Siegfried
Jill Siegfried
Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is the ligand for the tyrosine kinase receptor c-Met (Mesenchymal Epithelial Transition Factor also known as Hepatocyte Growth Factor Receptor, HGFR), a receptor with expression throughout epithelial and endothelial cell types. Activation of c-Met enhances cell proliferation, invasion, survival, angiogenesis, and motility. The c-Met pathway also stimulates tissue repair in normal cells. A body of past research shows that increased levels of HGF and/or overexpression of c-Met are associated with poor prognosis in several solid tumors, including lung cancer, as well as cancers of the head and neck, gastro-intestinal tract, breast, ovary and cervix. The HGF/c-Met signaling network is complex; both ligand-dependent and ligand-independent signaling occur. This article will provide an update on signaling through the HGF/c-Met axis, the mechanism of action of HGF/c-Met inhibitors, the lung cancer patient populations most likely to benefit, and possible mechanisms of resistance to these inhibitors. Although c-Met as a target in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) showed promise based on preclinical data, clinical responses in NSCLC patients have been disappointing in the absence of MET mutation or MET gene amplification. New therapeutics that selectively target c-Met or HGF, or that target c-Met and a wider spectrum of interacting tyrosine kinases, will be discussed.

1 September 2018 in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CNChristian Njatcha
Christian Njatcha
MFMariya Farooqui
Mariya Farooqui
AKAdam Kornberg
Adam Kornberg
DJDaniel E. Johnson
Daniel E. Johnson
JGJennifer R. Grandis
Jennifer R. Grandis
JSJill Siegfried
Jill Siegfried
Constitutively activated STAT3 plays a critical role in non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) progression by mediating proliferation and survival. STAT3 activation in normal cells is transient, making it an attractive target for NSCLC therapy. The therapeutic potential of blocking STAT3 in NSCLC was assessed utilizing a decoy approach by ligating a double-stranded 15-mer oligonucleotide that corresponds to the STAT3 response element of STAT3-target genes, to produce a cyclic STAT3 decoy (CS3D). The decoy was evaluated using NSCLC cells containing either wild-type EGFR (201T) or mutant EGFR with an additional EGFRi resistance mutation (H1975). These cells are resistant to EGFR inhibitors and require an alternate therapeutic approach. CS3D activity was compared with an inactive cyclic control oligonucleotide (CS3M) that differs by a single base pair, rendering it unable to bind to STAT3 protein. Transfection of 0.3 μmol/L of CS3D caused a 50% inhibition in proliferation in 201T and H1975 cells, relative to CS3M, and a 2-fold increase in apoptotic cells. Toxicity was minimal in normal cells. CS3D treatment caused a significant reduction of mRNA and protein expression of the STAT3 target gene c-Myc and inhibited colony formation by 70%. The active decoy decreased the nuclear pool of STAT3 compared with the mutant. In a xenograft model, treatments with CS3D (5 mg/kg) caused a potent 96.5% and 81.7% reduction in tumor growth in 201T (P < 0.007) and H1975 models (P < 0.0001), respectively, and reduced c-Myc and p-STAT3 proteins. Targeting STAT3 with the cyclic decoy could be an effective therapeutic strategy for NSCLC. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(9); 1917–26. ©2018 AACR.

16 January 2014 in Molecular Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJill Siegfried
Jill Siegfried
Experimental and population-based evidence has been steadily accumulating that steroid hormones are fundamentally involved in the biology of the lung. Both estrogen and progesterone receptors are present in normal and malignant lung tissue, and the reproductive hormones that bind these receptors have a role in lung development, lung inflammation, and lung cancer. The estrogen receptor-β (ER-β) was discovered in the 1990s as a novel form of ER that is transcribed from a gene distinct from ER-α, the receptor previously isolated from breast tissue. Interestingly, ER-β is the predominate ER expressed in normal and malignant lung tissue, whereas inflammatory cells that infiltrate the lung are known to express both ER-α and ER-β. Although there is evidence from animal models for the preferential effects of ER-β in the lungs of females, human lung tumors from males often contain comparable numbers of ER-β–positive cells and male-derived lung cancer cell lines respond to estrogens. Lung tumors from both males and females also express CYP19 (aromatase), the rate-limiting enzyme in estrogen synthesis that converts testosterone to estrone and β-estradiol. Thus, testosterone acts as a precursor for local estrogen production within lung tumors, independent of reproductive organs. This review discusses the recent literature findings about the biology of the ERs, aromatase, and the progesterone receptor in lung cancer and highlights the ongoing clinical trials and future therapeutic implications of these findings. Mol Cancer Res; 12(1); 24–31. ©2014 AACR.