Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and Crohn’s disease (CD), represent systematic chronic conditions with a deficient intestinal absorption. We first attempt to investigate the serum bile acids (sBAs) profile in a large cohort of IBD patients to evaluate changes under anti-TNF alpha treatment. Methods: Forty CD and 40 UC patients were enrolled and BAs were quantified by high-pressure liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ES-MS/MS). Up to 15 different sBAs concentrations and clinical biomarkers where added to a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to discriminate IBD from healthy conditions and treatment. Results: PCA allowed a separation into two clusters within CD (biologic-free patients and patients treated with anti-TNF alpha drugs and healthy subjects) but not UC. The first included CD. CD patients receiving anti-TNF alpha have an increase in total sBAs (4.11 ± 1.23 μM) compared to patients not exposed. Secondary BAs significantly increase after anti-TNF alpha treatment (1.54 ± 0.83 μM). Furthermore, multivariate analysis based on sBA concentration highlighted a different qualitative sBAs profile for UC and CD patients treated with conventional therapy. Conclusion: According to our results, anti-TNF alpha in CD restores the sBA profile by re-establishing the physiological levels. These findings indicate that, secondary BAs might serve as an indirect biomarker of the healing process.

Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) have been associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) development and chronic colonic inflammation seems to have a critical role in the pathogenesis of CRC in patients suffering from IBD. In respect to that, surveillance colonoscopy at regular intervals is recommended in patients with colitis. Objective: This review aims to explore the chemopreventive potential of a range of agents, including mesalazine, thiopurines, anti-TNF agents, statins, ursodeoxycholic acid, aspirin, folic acid, and nutraceuticals. Results: These agents target inflammation, oxidative stress, and oncogenic pathways, thereby offering the potential to reduce the risk of CRC in patients with IBD. Anti-TNF agents, such as infliximab and adalimumab, not only reduce colonic inflammation, but also play a protective role against CRC by lessening the carcinogenic effects associated with prolonged inflammatory processes. Furthermore, mesalazine and thiopurines have demonstrated established efficacy, while newer biologics, including interleukin inhibitors, show promising advancements. Although nutraceuticals and dietary interventions require further clinical validation, they offer additional possibilities for non-pharmacological prevention. Conclusion: Despite progress, knowledge gaps persist regarding the long-term safety, optimal dosing, and combined use of these agents. A significant reduction in the incidence of CRC in patients with IBD could be achieved by advancing chemoprevention and personalizing strategies.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)—including Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, and indeterminate colitis—is a chronic immune-mediated condition that primarily affects the intestinal mucosa but often presents with extraintestinal digestive manifestations, which are important yet frequently underrecognized sources of morbidity. These heterogeneous manifestations reflect diverse genetic, microbial, immunologic, and environmental influences, highlighting the value of a personalized medicine approach. Hepatobiliary involvement affects IBD adults patients and is even more common in children, ranging from mild liver enzyme elevations to severe complications such as liver failure, with autoimmune disorders, cholelithiasis, portal vein thrombosis, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as key considerations. Pancreatic manifestations may include autoimmune or acute pancreatitis, often linked to gallstones, thiopurine exposure, or duodenal Crohn’s disease, while splenic abnormalities, such as granulomatous lesions, splenomegaly, or functional hyposplenism, reflect systemic immune dysregulation. Oral findings—including aphthous ulcers, periodontitis, pyostomatitis vegetans, and granulomatous cheilitis—can serve as early, patient-specific indicators of disease activity. Personalized approaches, encompassing investigations tailored to the individual profile and selected targeted therapies, are essential for improving diagnostic accuracy, preventing complications, and optimizing multidisciplinary care in patients with IBD.

Accurate quantification of immune cell subpopulations is essential for understanding immune responses in research and clinical settings. Flow cytometry (FC) is widely used for immune cell phenotyping, providing rapid and quantitative single-cell resolution. However, tissue-based pathological assessment offers additional spatial and morphological context that is often necessary for a comprehensive understanding of immune cell distribution. Traditionally, these methods are applied separately to different specimens, limiting direct comparative analysis. Here, we describe a simple combined approach to immune cell quantification that integrates both FC and pathology analysis within the same tissue specimen of colon biopsies. Tissue samples were divided into two portions: one processed into a single-cell suspension for FC-based characterization of CD45⁺, CD3⁺, CD4⁺, and CD8⁺ T cells and another formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE), and analyzed with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for eosinophils and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD4 and CD8. A pilot analysis of 10 samples shows high concordance of the results taken from the two methods, allowing for cross-validation between methodologies and improved diagnostic accuracy. This proof-of-principle study demonstrates the feasibility of an integrated workflow that combines FC and pathology for immune cell quantification, which provides assessment of immune cell populations from the limited material of intestinal biopsies with potential for improved diagnostic accuracy.

Background: Dysbiosis, mucosal inflammation and increased intestinal permeability have been implicated in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a sequential butyrate–probiotic administration in reducing symptoms and improving stool consistency in patients with diarrhea-predominant (IBS-D) or mixed-type IBS (IBS-M). Methods: Two hundred adult patients were allocated to intervention (n = 105) or control (n = 95). The intervention group received ColonLife formulation (Εuro-Pharma S.r.l., Torino—Italy), consisting of two distinct capsules: the first containing butyric acid and grapefruit seed extract, and the second containing microencapsulated probiotic strains together with fructooligosaccharides (FOSs). Symptom severity, quality of life and stool consistency (Bristol Stool Scale) were assessed at baseline and three follow-up visits. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). Diarrhea severity decreased significantly in the intervention group (3.78 ± 1.01 to 3.31 ± 1.21; Δ − 0.47) compared with minimal change in controls (3.71 ± 1.05 to 3.62 ± 1.14; Δ − 0.08; p = 0.015). Stool consistency improved more in the intervention group (−1.18 ± 1.46 vs. −0.64 ± 1.41; p = 0.028), with normal stools increasing from 1.0% to 65.7% versus 4.2% to 36.8% in controls (p < 0.001). The degree of change in pain scores was similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). The degree of reduction in bloating scores was also similar between groups (p > 0.05). Quality of life improved in both groups (intervention: +0.68 ± 1.43; control: +0.71 ± 1.64; both p < 0.01), with no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Sequential butyrate–probiotic administration significantly improves diarrhea, stool consistency and gastrointestinal symptoms in IBS-D and IBS-M, supporting its role as a microbiota-targeted treatment.