This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). The Guideline was also reviewed and endorsed by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG). It addresses the roles of small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders. Main recommendations 1 ESGE recommends small-bowel video capsule endoscopy as the first-line investigation in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 2 In patients with overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, ESGE recommends performing small-bowel capsule endoscopy as soon as possible after the bleeding episode, optimally within 14 days, in order to maximize the diagnostic yield (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 3 ESGE does not recommend the routine performance of second-look endoscopy prior to small-bowel capsule endoscopy; however whether to perform second-look endoscopy before capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding or iron-deficiency anaemia should be decided on a case-by-case basis (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). 4 In patients with positive findings at small-bowel capsule endoscopy, ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy to confirm and possibly treat lesions identified by capsule endoscopy (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). 5 ESGE recommends ileocolonoscopy as the first endoscopic examination for investigating patients with suspected Crohn’s disease (strong recommendation, high quality evidence). In patients with suspected Crohn’s disease and negative ileocolonoscopy findings, ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy as the initial diagnostic modality for investigating the small bowel, in the absence of obstructive symptoms or known stenosis (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). ESGE does not recommend routine small-bowel imaging or the use of the PillCam patency capsule prior to capsule endoscopy in these patients (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). In the presence of obstructive symptoms or known stenosis, ESGE recommends that dedicated small bowel cross-sectional imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance enterography/enteroclysis or computed tomography enterography/enteroclysis should be used first (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). 6 In patients with established Crohn’s disease, based on ileocolonoscopy findings, ESGE recommends dedicated cross-sectional imaging for small-bowel evaluation since this has the potential to assess extent and location of any Crohn’s disease lesions, to identify strictures, and to assess for extraluminal disease (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). In patients with unremarkable or nondiagnostic findings from such cross-sectional imaging of the small bowel, ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a subsequent investigation, if deemed to influence patient management (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). When capsule endoscopy is indicated, ESGE recommends use of the PillCam patency capsule to confirm functional patency of the small bowel (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). 7 ESGE strongly recommends against the use of small-bowel capsule endoscopy for suspected coeliac disease but suggests that capsule endoscopy could be used in patients unwilling or unable to undergo conventional endoscopy (strong recommendation, low quality evidence).

The Lewis Score (LS) can assess inflammatory activity on small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). We aimed to evaluate the LS usefulness in the setting of suspected Crohn's Disease (CD). Retrospective single-center study including 56 patients undergoing SBCE for suspected CD. Patients were divided into three groups, according to clinical presentation: Group 1 (28 patients): suspected CD not supported by the International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy (ICCE) criteria; Group 2 (19 patients): suspected CD based on two ICCE criteria; Group 3 (9 patients): patients fulfilling three or more criteria. Inflammatory activity was assessed with the LS. The diagnosis of CD required a minimum follow-up of 6 months after SBCE, basing on clinical evaluation, endoscopic, histological, radiological, and/or biochemical investigations. SBCE detected significant inflammatory activity (LS≥135) in 23 patients (41.1%), being 5 patients from Group 1 (17.8%), 11 from Group 2 (57.9%) and 7 from Group 3 (77.8%) (p<0.05). CD was diagnosed in 23 patients (41.1%): six patients from Group 1 (21.4%), 10 from Group 2 (52.6%) and 7 from Group 3 (77.8%) (p<0.05). CD was diagnosed in 82.6% of patients with significant inflammatory activity on CE (LS≥135), but in only 12.1% of those having a LS<135 (p<0.05). The LS Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value, Sensitivity and Specificity were 82.6%, 87.9%, 82.6% and 87.9%, respectively. The LS may be a valuable diagnostic tool in the setting of suspected CD. Patients not fulfilling the ICCE criteria have lower LS and fewer are diagnosed with CD during follow-up.

Background and aims Extensive evidence has underlined the importance of mucosal healing as a treatment aim for ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to assess differences in the incidence of clinical relapse at 12 months between UC patients with Mayo endoscopic scores (MES) 0 and 1. Methods Retrospective study, including consecutive patients in corticosteroid-free remission between 2008 and 2013 and follow-up of at least one year, with MES 0 or 1 in complete colonoscopy. Clinical relapse was defined as need for induction treatment, treatment escalation, hospitalization or surgery. A p value < 0,05 was considered statistically significant. Results Included 138 patients, 72 (52,2%) female, with mean age 49 (±14) years. Inflammatory activity was classified as MES 0 in 61 (44,2%) patients and MES 1 in 77 (55,8%) patients. Clinical relapse during follow-up was significantly more frequent in patients with MES 1 than MES 0 (27,3 versus 11,5%; p=0,022), and in the multivariate analysis, MES 1 was the only factor significantly associated with an increased risk of relapse (OR=2,89 CI 95% 1,14-7,36; p=0,026). This association was encountered in the subgroup of patients with left-sided/extensive colitis (29,7 versus 11,1%; p=0,049), but not proctitis (25,0% versus 12,0%, p=0,202). Conclusions In patients with ulcerative colitis in corticosteroid-free remission, particularly those with left sided colitis or extensive colitis, MES 1 was significantly associated with a threefold increased risk of relapse compared to endoscopic MES 0. Our results support the use of endoscopic MES 0 as the most suitable treatment endpoint to define mucosal healing in patients with UC.

AIM: To evaluate mucosal healing in patients with small bowel plus colonic Crohn’s disease (CD) with a single non-invasive examination, by using PillCam COLON 2^© (PCC2). METHODS: Patients with non-stricturing nonpenetrating small bowel plus colonic CD in sustained corticosteroid-free remission were included. At diagnosis, patients had undergone ileocolonoscopy to identify active CD lesions, such as ulcers and erosions, and small bowel capsule endoscopy to assess the Lewis Score (LS). After ≥ 1 year of follow-up, patients underwent entire gastrointestinal tract evaluation with PCC2. The primary endpoint was assessment of CD mucosal healing, defined as no active colonic CD lesions and LS < 135. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included (7 male; mean age: 32 years), and mean follow-up was 38 mo. The majority of patients (83.3%) received immunosuppressive therapy. Three patients (25%) achieved mucosal healing in both the small bowel and the colon, while disease activity was limited to either the small bowel or the colon in 5 patients (42%). It was possible to observe the entire gastrointestinal tract in 10 of the 12 patients (83%) who underwent PCC2. CONCLUSION: Only three patients in sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission achieved mucosal healing in both the small bowel and the colon, highlighting the limitations of clinical assessment when stratifying disease activity, and the need for pan-enteric endoscopy to guide therapeutic modification.

Oral purgative and simethicone before small bowel capsule endoscopy