Mohit Naresh Shivdasani

Mohit Naresh Shivdasani

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 December 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LALauren N. Ayton
Lauren N. Ayton
PBPeter J. Blamey
Peter J. Blamey
RGRobyn Guymer
Robyn Guymer
CLChi Luu
Chi Luu
DNDavid A. X. Nayagam
David A. X. Nayagam
FCfor the Bionic Vision Australia Research Consortium
for the Bionic Vision Australia Research Consortium
Retinal visual prostheses (“bionic eyes”) have the potential to restore vision to blind or profoundly vision-impaired patients. The medical bionic technology used to design, manufacture and implant such prostheses is still in its relative infancy, with various technologies and surgical approaches being evaluated. We hypothesised that a suprachoroidal implant location (between the sclera and choroid of the eye) would provide significant surgical and safety benefits for patients, allowing them to maintain preoperative residual vision as well as gaining prosthetic vision input from the device. This report details the first-in-human Phase 1 trial to investigate the use of retinal implants in the suprachoroidal space in three human subjects with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa. The success of the suprachoroidal surgical approach and its associated safety benefits, coupled with twelve-month post-operative efficacy data, holds promise for the field of vision restoration. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01603576

1 October 2013 in Trends in Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRobert K. Shepherd
Robert K. Shepherd
MSMohit Naresh Shivdasani
Mohit Naresh Shivdasani
DNDavid A.X. Nayagam
David A.X. Nayagam
CWChristopher E. Williams
Christopher E. Williams
PBPeter J. Blamey
Peter J. Blamey

4 May 2015 in Advanced Functional Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NANicholas V. Apollo
Nicholas V. Apollo
MMMatias I. Maturana
Matias I. Maturana
WTWei Tong
Wei Tong
DNDavid A. X. Nayagam
David A. X. Nayagam
MSMohit Naresh Shivdasani
Mohit Naresh Shivdasani
DGDavid J. Garrett
David J. Garrett

1 August 2012 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AHAlex E. Hadjinicolaou
Alex E. Hadjinicolaou
RLRonald T. Leung
Ronald T. Leung
DGDavid J. Garrett
David J. Garrett
KGKumaravelu Ganesan
Kumaravelu Ganesan
KFKate Fox
Kate Fox
BOBrendan J. O’bRien
Brendan J. O’bRien

1 January 2014 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGKumaravelu Ganesan
Kumaravelu Ganesan
DGDavid J. Garrett
David J. Garrett
IAI arman Ahnood
I arman Ahnood
MSMohit Naresh Shivdasani
Mohit Naresh Shivdasani
WTWei Tong
Wei Tong
SPsteven prawer
steven prawer

18 May 2010 in Journal of Neural Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMohit Naresh Shivdasani
Mohit Naresh Shivdasani
CLChi Luu
Chi Luu
RCRosemary Cicione
Rosemary Cicione
JFJames B Fallon
James B Fallon
PAPenny J Allen
Penny J Allen
CWChris E Williams
Chris E Williams
Several approaches have been proposed for placement of retinal prostheses: epiretinal, subretinal and suprachoroidal. We aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of varying a range of stimulus parameters and electrode geometry for a suprachoroidal electrode array, using cortical evoked responses to monopolar electrical stimulation in cats. Our results indicate that charge thresholds were not dependent on electrode size, pulse widths or position of the return electrode tested, but were dependent on the number of sites stimulated in parallel. Further, we found that the combination of monopolar stimulation with large diameter electrodes, wide pulse widths and parallel stimulation minimized the voltage requirements for stimulation. These results provide useful insights for the design specifications of a low voltage suprachoroidal stimulator.