Anita N. Datta

Dr. Anita N. Datta

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2017 in The American Journal of Human Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAnna Lehman
Anna Lehman
STSamrat Thouta
Samrat Thouta
GMGrazia M.S. Mancini
Grazia M.S. Mancini
SNSakkubai Naidu
Sakkubai Naidu
MSMarjon van Slegtenhorst
Marjon van Slegtenhorst
SVSuzanne Vercauteren
Suzanne Vercauteren

5 December 2018 in Journal of Child Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
QXQi Xu
Qi Xu
SUShimrit Uliel-Sibony
Shimrit Uliel-Sibony
CDChristopher Dunham
Christopher Dunham
HSHarvey Sarnat
Harvey Sarnat
LFLaura Flores-Sarnat
Laura Flores-Sarnat
ADAnita N. Datta
Anita N. Datta
Hemimegalencephaly is a hamartomatous malformation of one hemisphere. Functional hemispherectomy, the definitive treatment, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in early infancy. Dysregulation of the mTOR pathway can result in malformations of cortical development, and mTOR inhibitors can effectively reduce seizures in tuberous sclerosis complex. We report a 6-day-old female with hemimegalencephaly and frequent seizures despite 9 antiseizure medications. At 3 months of age, while awaiting hemispherectomy, an mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin, was initiated by the neurologist. After 1 week of treatment, there was >50% reduction in seizures and total seizure burden, and after 2 weeks, development improved, resulting in deferral of surgery by 2.5 months with an increased body weight. Pathology demonstrated cortical dysplasia with upregulation of the mTOR pathway. Deep-sequencing of brain tissue demonstrated 16% mosaicism for a pathogenic de novo MTOR gene mutation. This case exemplifies how mTOR inhibitors could be considered for seizure reduction in patients with hemimegalencephaly while awaiting surgery.

1 October 2017 in Pediatric Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWColin Wilbur
Colin Wilbur
SBSarah E. Buerki
Sarah E. Buerki
IGIlaria Guella
Ilaria Guella
ETEric B. Toyota
Eric B. Toyota
DEDaniel M. Evans
Daniel M. Evans
MDMichelle Demos
Michelle Demos

7 November 2016 in Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CWColin Wilbur
Colin Wilbur
CSChinnuwat Sanguansermsri
Chinnuwat Sanguansermsri
HCHedi Chable
Hedi Chable
MAMihaela Anghelina
Mihaela Anghelina
SPSharon Peinhof
Sharon Peinhof
MCMary B. Connolly
Mary B. Connolly
Background:Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a neurocutaneous disorder with a wide spectrum of manifestations. Recent consensus recommendations stress the importance of multidisciplinary management of children with TSC. The objective of this study was to examine the manifestations of TSC at a large referral centre to determine the care needs of this population.Methods:A retrospective, systematic chart review was performed of children with TSC managed at British Columbia Children’s Hospital. Patients were identified through epilepsy and clinical neurophysiology databases.Results:The study population comprised 81 patients, born between 1987 and 2014, who were a median of 10 years (range, 0.2-23.2) at most recent follow-up. Epilepsy occurred in 91% of patients, including 32% with a history of infantile spasms. Nineteen patients underwent epilepsy surgery, nine (47%) of whom were seizure-free at most recent follow-up. Overall, 61% of epilepsy patients had been seizure-free for at least 1 year at the time of last follow-up. Neuropsychiatric disorders were diagnosed in 49% of children, with autism (25%), attention deficit hyperactivity order (19%) and anxiety (16%) being the most common. Cardiac rhabdomyomata occurred in 35% of children and renal angiomyolipomas were seen in 43%. A total of 91% had skin manifestations.Conclusion:This study outlines the multisystem manifestations of TSC, observed through a large pediatric referral center. Epilepsy and neuropsychiatric disorders are the major source of morbidity in this age group and provide many challenges to the treating clinician. Because a subset of the study population is still quite young, the prevalence of neuropsychiatric disorders is likely underestimated.

16 May 2017 in Journal of Child Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAnita N. Datta
Anita N. Datta
QXQi Xu
Qi Xu
SSShafina Sachedina
Shafina Sachedina
CBCyrus Boelman
Cyrus Boelman
LHLinda Huh
Linda Huh
MCMary B. Connolly
Mary B. Connolly
Perampanel (PER) is a new antiseizure medication that inhibits the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) class of glutamate receptors. It is important for physicians to be aware of the efficacy and tolerability of new drugs in the postmarketing phase. We performed a retrospective review of our experience with perampanel at BC Children’s Hospital. Twenty-four pediatric patients prescribed perampanel from 2014 to 2016 were identified. Fifteen (63%) discontinued perampanel, and 10 (42%) had greater than 50% reduction in seizures. Twelve (50%) had behavioral and 8 (33%) had nonbehavioral adverse events. One-third experienced serious adverse events. One patient experienced oculogyric crisis, which is not previously reported with perampanel. Adverse events were not dose related and were reversible. Possible risk factors for behavioral adverse events include a history of behavioral problems with other antiseizure medications and preexisting behavioral comorbidities. It is important to counsel patients about the potential for serious adverse events, particularly behavioral, when prescribing perampanel.

22 August 2023 in Epilepsy & Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JWJames W Whelessd
James W Whelessd
RWRobert T. Wechsler
Robert T. Wechsler
PPPatricia Penovich
Patricia Penovich
ESEric Segal
Eric Segal
MCMichael Chez
Michael Chez
VVVicente Villanueva
Vicente Villanueva
To assess the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of perampanel (PER) in people with epilepsy (PWE) treated in everyday clinical practice for focal and generalized seizures, both in the total cohort and by age group. The PERMIT Extension study was a pooled analysis of data from PWE included in two large previous clinical practice studies (PERMIT and PROVE). Retention was assessed over 12 months. Effectiveness was assessed based on total seizures and by seizure type (focal and generalized) after 3, 6, and 12 months of PER treatment and at final follow-up (last observation carried forward; "last visit"); assessments included responder rate (≥50% seizure frequency reduction from baseline) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the previous visit). Safety/tolerability was assessed throughout PER treatment by evaluating adverse events (AEs). All assessments were conducted for the total population and by age category (<12, ≥12 to <18, ≥18 to <65, and ≥65 years at baseline). Full Analysis Set included 6,822 PWE (51.1% female; mean age, 36.9 years; mean duration of epilepsy 21.4 years) with 6,433, 4,648, and 6,233 PWE assessed for retention, effectiveness, and safety/tolerability, respectively. The majority of PWE (81.1%) were aged 18-64 at baseline, with 4.5% aged <12 years, 8.4% aged 12-17 years, and 5.9% aged ≥65 years. In the overall population, retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 88.0%, 77.6%, and 61.4%, respectively; responder rates at 12 months were 58.5% for total seizures, 54.6% for focal seizures, and 77.7% for generalized seizures, and corresponding seizure freedom rates were 23.6%, 19.0%, and 51.3%, respectively. PER was effective regardless of age category, although effectiveness was greatest in PWE aged ≥65 years, for both focal and generalized seizures. In the overall population, the incidence of AEs was 49.2% and the most frequent AEs (≥5% of PWE) were dizziness/vertigo (13.4%), somnolence (8.8%), irritability (7.3%), and behavioral disorders (5.3%); AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 18.3% of PWE over 12 months. The incidence of AEs and the discontinuation rate due to AEs increased with increasing age (55.0% and 23.9%, respectively, in PWE aged ≥65 years). In this study, the largest pooled analysis of PER clinical practice data conducted to date, PER was shown to be effective and generally well tolerated when used to treat people with focal or generalized epilepsy in everyday clinical practice, regardless of age category. No new or unexpected side effects emerged following long-term use in the real-world setting.