Introduction Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis with an overall 5-year survival of approximately 8%. The success in reducing the mortality rate of PDAC is related to the discovery of new therapeutic agents, and to a significant extent to the development of early detection and prevention programmes. Patients with new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM) represent a high-risk group for PDAC as they have an eightfold higher risk of PDAC than the general population. The proposed screening programme may allow the detection of PDAC in the early, operable stage. Diagnosing more patients in the curable stage might decrease the morbidity and mortality rates of PDAC and additionally reduce the burden of the healthcare. Methods and analysis This is a prospective, multicentre observational cohort study. Patients ≥60 years old diagnosed with new-onset (≤6 months) diabetes will be included. Exclusion criteria are (1) Continuous alcohol abuse; (2) Chronic pancreatitis; (3) Previous pancreas operation/pancreatectomy; (4) Pregnancy; (5) Present malignant disease and (6) Type 1 DM. Follow-up visits are scheduled every 6 months for up to 36 months. Data collection is based on questionnaires. Clinical symptoms, body weight and fasting blood will be collected at each, carbohydrate antigen 19–9 and blood to biobank at every second visit. The blood samples will be processed to plasma and analysed with mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomics. The metabolomic data will be used for biomarker validation for early detection of PDAC in the high-risk group patients with new-onset diabetes. Patients with worrisome features will undergo MRI or endoscopic ultrasound investigation, and surgical referral depending on the radiological findings. One of the secondary end points is the incidence of PDAC in patients with newly diagnosed DM. Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Medical Research Council (41085-6/2019). We plan to disseminate the results to several members of the healthcare system includining medical doctors, dietitians, nurses, patients and so on. We plan to publish the results in a peer-reviewed high-quality journal for professionals. In addition, we also plan to publish it for lay readers in order to maximalise the dissemination and benefits of this trial. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04164602

Background. People with diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) have increased cardiovascular mortality. However, the association between distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) or CAN with all-cause mortality is much less investigated. Thus, we set out to examine the effect of CAN and DSPN on all-cause mortality in a well-phenotyped cohort. Methods. All diabetes cases ( $n=\mathrm{1,347}$ ) from the catchment area of a secondary diabetes care centre who had medical examination including neuropathy assessment between 1997 and 2016 were followed up for all-cause mortality in the NHS Hungary reimbursement database until 2018. We investigated the association of CAN (Ewing tests) and DSPN (Neurometer) with all-cause mortality using Cox models stratified by diabetes type. Results. Altogether, $n=131/\mathrm{1,011}$ persons with type 1/type 2 diabetes were included. Of the participants, 53%/43% were male, mean age was $46\pm 12/64\pm 10$ years, diabetes duration was $13\pm 10/7\pm 8$ years, 42%/29% had CAN, and 39%/37% had DSPN. During the $9\pm 5/8\pm 5$ -year follow-up, $n=28/494$ participants died. In fully adjusted models, participants with type 1 diabetes patients with versus without DSPN had an increased mortality (HR 2.99, 95% CI 1.4-8.63), while no association with CAN was observed. In type 2 diabetes, both DSPN and CAN independently increased mortality (HR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.07-1.64, and HR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.17-1.76). Conclusions. Our results are compatible with an increased risk of mortality in people with type 1 diabetes and DSPN. Furthermore, we report a similarly strong association between DSPN and CAN and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Introduction: In 1989, the St Vincent declaration aimed to approximate pregnancy outcomes of diabetes to that of healthy pregnancies. We aimed to compare frequency and trends of outcomes of pregnancies affected by type 1 diabetes and controls in 1996–2018.Methods: We used anonymized records of a mandatory nation-wide registry of all deliveries between gestational weeks 24 and 42 in Hungary. We included all singleton births (4,091 type 1 diabetes, 1,879,183 controls) between 1996 and 2018. We compared frequency and trends of pregnancy outcomes between type 1 diabetes and control pregnancies using hierarchical Poisson regression.Results: The frequency of stillbirth, perinatal mortality, large for gestational age, caesarean section, admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and low Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration (APGAR) score was 2-4 times higher in type 1 diabetes compared to controls, while the risk of congenital malformations was increased by 51% and SGA was decreased by 42% (all p<0.05). These observations remained significant after adjustment for confounders except for low APGAR scores. We found decreasing rate ratios comparing cases and controls over time for caesarean sections, low APGAR scores (p<0.05), and for NICU admissions (p=0.052) in adjusted models. The difference between cases and controls became non-significant after 2009. No linear trends were observed for the other outcomes.Conclusions: Although we found that the rates of SGA, NICU care, and low APGAR score improved in pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes, the target of the St Vincent Declaration was only achieved for the occurrence of low APGAR scores.

Introduction: Autonomic and sensory neuropathy have been observed in both prediabetes and manifest diabetes mellitus. However, there is a lack of available data regarding whether patients at a moderate or high risk of developing diabetes, yet without a current diagnosis of prediabetes or diabetes, exhibit an increased prevalence of neuropathy.Methods: FINDRISC (Finnish Diabetes Risk Score) was used to classify individuals at risk (≥12 points, n = 44; control 5.6% served as exclusion criteria, and patients with known medical conditions predisposing to neuropathy were also excluded. Cardiac autonomic function (Ewing tests) and peripheral sensory neuropathy (Neurometer and Q-sense) were assessed by standardized protocols, and their potential association with increased FINDRISC points was analyzed using a regression model.Results: Mean age was 46.7 ± 14.3 years in the control and 55.7 ± 14.1 years in the increased risk group. Male/female ratio did not differ. Individuals with increased risk of diabetes were more obese (BMI: 29.9 ± 12.5 kg/m² vs. 25.9 ± 8.9 kg/m²). Additionally, hypertension was more frequent among them (68.2% vs. 17.9%), and their lipid parameters were also less favorable. Parasympathetic neuropathy was present in both groups (56.8% vs. 32.1%, respectively). Sympathetic neuropathy was not found. Sensory nerve dysfunction was of low prevalence in the high-risk group and did not occur in healthy controls. In multiple logistic regression analysis, HbA1c exhibited an independent association with parasympathetic neuropathy (OR: 5.9; 95% CI: 1.08–32.68; p < 0.041).Discussion: An increased risk of developing prediabetes/diabetes does not appear to have a strong correlation with an increased likelihood of developing autonomic or sensory neuropathy. However, the etiology behind the occurrence of parasympathetic autonomic neuropathy in healthy individuals remains unknown.