Susan M. Kleiner

Dr. Susan M. Kleiner


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
CKChad Kerksick
Chad Kerksick
CWColin D. Wilborn
Colin D. Wilborn
Mike RobertsMike Roberts
Mike Roberts
ASAbbie E Smith-Ryan
Abbie E Smith-Ryan
SKSusan M. Kleiner
Susan M. Kleiner
Richard KreiderRichard Kreider
Richard Kreider
Sports nutrition is a constantly evolving field with hundreds of research papers published annually. In the year 2017 alone, 2082 articles were published under the key words ‘sport nutrition’. Consequently, staying current with the relevant literature is often difficult. This paper is an ongoing update of the sports nutrition review article originally published as the lead paper to launch the Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition in 2004 and updated in 2010. It presents a well-referenced overview of the current state of the science related to optimization of training and performance enhancement through exercise training and nutrition. Notably, due to the accelerated pace and size at which the literature base in this research area grows, the topics discussed will focus on muscle hypertrophy and performance enhancement. As such, this paper provides an overview of: 1.) How ergogenic aids and dietary supplements are defined in terms of governmental regulation and oversight; 2.) How dietary supplements are legally regulated in the United States; 3.) How to evaluate the scientific merit of nutritional supplements; 4.) General nutritional strategies to optimize performance and enhance recovery; and, 5.) An overview of our current understanding of nutritional approaches to augment skeletal muscle hypertrophy and the potential ergogenic value of various dietary and supplemental approaches. This updated review is to provide ISSN members and individuals interested in sports nutrition with information that can be implemented in educational, research or practical settings and serve as a foundational basis for determining the efficacy and safety of many common sport nutrition products and their ingredients.

Richard KreiderRichard Kreider
Richard Kreider
SHSusan Hewlings
Susan Hewlings
JAJose Antonio
Jose Antonio
TZTim Ziegenfuss
Tim Ziegenfuss
RWRobert Wildman
Robert Wildman
HLHector L. Lopez
Hector L. Lopez
Creatine is one of the most popular nutritional ergogenic aids for athletes. Studies have consistently shown that creatine supplementation increases intramuscular creatine concentrations which may ...

AAAlan Aragon
Alan Aragon
BSBrad J. Schoenfeld
Brad J. Schoenfeld
RWRobert Wildman
Robert Wildman
SKSusan M. Kleiner
Susan M. Kleiner
TVTrisha VanDusseldorp
Trisha VanDusseldorp
JAJose Antonio
Jose Antonio
Position Statement: The International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) bases the following position stand on a critical analysis of the literature regarding the effects of diet types (macronutrient composition; eating styles) and their influence on body composition. The ISSN has concluded the following. 1) There is a multitude of diet types and eating styles, whereby numerous subtypes fall under each major dietary archetype. 2) All body composition assessment methods have strengths and limitations. 3) Diets primarily focused on fat loss are driven by a sustained caloric deficit. The higher the baseline body fat level, the more aggressively the caloric deficit may be imposed. Slower rates of weight loss can better preserve lean mass (LM) in leaner subjects. 4) Diets focused primarily on accruing LM are driven by a sustained caloric surplus to facilitate anabolic processes and support increasing resistance-training demands. The composition and magnitude of the surplus, as well as training status of the subjects can influence the nature of the gains. 5) A wide range of dietary approaches (low-fat to low-carbohydrate/ketogenic, and all points between) can be similarly effective for improving body composition. 6) Increasing dietary protein to levels significantly beyond current recommendations for athletic populations may result in improved body composition. Higher protein intakes (2.3–3.1 g/kg FFM) may be required to maximize muscle retention in lean, resistance-trained subjects under hypocaloric conditions. Emerging research on very high protein intakes (>3 g/kg) has demonstrated that the known thermic, satiating, and LM-preserving effects of dietary protein might be amplified in resistance-training subjects. 7) The collective body of intermittent caloric restriction research demonstrates no significant advantage over daily caloric restriction for improving body composition. 8) The long-term success of a diet depends upon compliance and suppression or circumvention of mitigating factors such as adaptive thermogenesis. 9) There is a paucity of research on women and older populations, as well as a wide range of untapped permutations of feeding frequency and macronutrient distribution at various energetic balances combined with training. Behavioral and lifestyle modification strategies are still poorly researched areas of weight management.

PBPaul M La Bounty
Paul M La Bounty
BCBill I Campbell
Bill I Campbell
JWJacob Wilson
Jacob Wilson
EGElfego Galvan
Elfego Galvan
JBJohn Berardi
John Berardi
JAJose Antonio
Jose Antonio
Position Statement: Admittedly, research to date examining the physiological effects of meal frequency in humans is somewhat limited. More specifically, data that has specifically examined the impact of meal frequency on body composition, training adaptations, and performance in physically active individuals and athletes is scant. Until more research is available in the physically active and athletic populations, definitive conclusions cannot be made. However, within the confines of the current scientific literature, we assert that:

9 March 2026 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KJKarol Jędrejko
Karol Jędrejko
OCOliver Catlin
Oliver Catlin
Maciej JędrejkoMaciej Jędrejko
Maciej Jędrejko
BMBożena Muszyńska
Bożena Muszyńska
IBIzabela Bat
Izabela Bat
RJRalf Jäger
Ralf Jäger
Background: Succinic acid plays a central role in human energy metabolism as a key intermediate of the Krebs cycle that releases energy accumulated as guanosine triphosphate (GTP). Through its conversion via succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), succinate directly links the Krebs cycle to oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), contributing to adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production. Exercise induces pronounced changes in succinate concentrations in skeletal muscle, blood, and saliva, with responses influenced by training status, exercise modality, and intensity. Objective: This systematic review evaluated the effects of succinate-containing supplements or sole-ingredient succinic acid supplementation on exercise performance and post-exercise recovery in healthy trained individuals. Methods: The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched without date restrictions. Interventional studies assessing succinate-containing supplementation with outcomes related to exercise performance or recovery were included. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. This study was registered in advance with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD420251237042). Results: Six studies involving 153 participants (mean age: 23 years) met the inclusion criteria. Five of the six included studies were rated as having a high risk of bias, while the only study judged to be at low risk of bias reported no beneficial effects on exercise performance outcomes. Supplementation protocols included daily doses of 300–2040 mg for up to 21 days and a single acute dose of 30 mg/kg, with most interventions administering succinate as part of multi-ingredient formulations rather than as an isolated compound. Three studies reported ergogenic effects in direct performance metrics, including improvements in maximal oxygen uptake, oxygen consumption, anaerobic threshold power, and total work performed. Two additional studies demonstrated favorable physiological adaptations indirectly relevant to exercise performance, including improved acid-base regulation, hematological markers related to oxygen transport, and antioxidant status, although validated performance outcomes were not assessed. Substantial heterogeneity and overall methodological limitations precluded meta-analysis. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that succinate-containing supplements or sole-ingredient succinic acid supplementation may enhance direct performance outcomes such as aerobic performance, total workload, and indirect physiological markers, e.g., acid-base balance, hematological indicators and antioxidant capacity in healthy trained individuals. However, given that the majority of included studies were at high risk of bias and the only low-risk study reported no ergogenic effects, current evidence does not provide reliable support for performance-enhancing benefits of succinate supplementation. Interpretation is further limited by the predominant use of multi-ingredient formulations, making it difficult to isolate the effects of succinic acid. While biologically plausible mechanisms exist, well-controlled trials using isolated succinic acid are required before conclusions regarding efficacy can be drawn.