To date, research has focussed on understanding how various contextual factors facilitate students’ adjustments to university as they begin their studies. However, there seems to be limited or no research and instruments that have specifically conceptualised and measured students’ adjustments, considering their transitional challenges, emotional wellbeing, and barriers to seeking help. Incorporating these factors, we previously developed a model of students’ adjustments, titled Transition, Wellbeing, Help-seeking and Adjustments (TWHAS). Building on this model, this paper aims to empirically validate the hypothesised TWHAS model using a validated survey and data collected from 306 first-year students transitioning to an Australian university. The strength of the predictive relations among the selected variables was tested by the significance of the path coefficients of the model. Our findings show a good fit to the theoretical model developed and demonstrate how students’ sociodemographic barriers to seeking help and moods (e.g. anxiety) can create a psychological barrier (e.g. lack of openness to seeking help) and how psychological barriers can further inhibit students’ overall adjustments to university. These findings have important implications for higher education policymakers, staff as well as administrators, counselling and support services future research on promoting students’ the positive adjustments to transition to university.

In recent decades, several countries have made efforts to close the historic gender gap in physics through curricular reforms. Research indicates that while the acute underrepresentation of females in physics courses and related careers is linked to a number of interlaced social, contextual and motivational factors, the personal relevance of physics curricula is important. Some researchers argue that physics has been historically perceived as a “masculine” domain which operates through contexts that are unfamiliar to females. Introduction of a “girl-friendly” physics curriculum is one of the prominent measures employed to mitigate this concern, with researchers arguing that a context-based/humanistic physics curriculum will improve gender inclusivity and thereby increase females’ motivation to learn physics. However, this approach has been criticised as a “feminisation” of the physics curriculum. This paper uses a mixed-methods approach underpinned by expectancy-value theory, to analyse 247 students’ perceptions of an Australian senior secondary physics curriculum and investigates the claim that including “female-friendly” topics will make physics more appealing to females. Findings suggest that while most students found their physics curriculum interesting and personally relevant, neither females nor males found the “feminine” topics particularly appealing. Both male and female students also found there was a lack of mathematical applications, and they identified descriptive topics, such as those addressing social and historical contexts, as uninteresting and irrelevant in a physics curriculum. This paper concludes that gender was non-significant in student perceptions of a senior secondary physics curriculum.

This study investigated shifts in preservice teachers’ perceived preparedness, readiness to engage in the profession, and teaching self-efficacy before and after a culminating field experience within a two-year, master’s level initial teacher education program at a large Australian university. Employing the Pre-service Teacher Professional Experience (PTPE) scale, we examined pre-service teachers’ pre- and post-field experience changes for each construct. We then used structural equation modeling to test a hypothesized causal framework, confirming theorized relationships among preparedness, readiness to engage, and self-efficacy for teaching. Path analyses revealed significant shifts in how specific dimensions of preparedness contributed to preservice teachers’ readiness to engage in the profession, which, in turn, influenced their teaching self-efficacy. Findings support the utility of the PTPE and causal framework in future research on teacher preparation, particularly as a means for teacher education programs to assess pre-service teacher development in alignment with professional standards for teaching.