Background/Objectives: A family history of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is an important risk factor for developing PD. Because only a few studies have investigated the clinical characteristics of PD patients based on family history, this study compared the clinical characteristics of PD patients with and without a family history of PD. Methods: The study involved 356 patients with de novo PD. The data on the patients’ PD family histories were obtained from the patients and their caregivers. Motor and non-motor PD symptoms were assessed using the appropriate scales. Results: Out of the 356 PD patients, 26 (7.3%) had a family history of PD. Compared with patients without a family history of PD, those with a family history of PD tended to be younger at diagnosis (67.9 years vs. 62.2 years, respectively; p = 0.009) and exhibited significantly more severe rigidity (p = 0.036). Motor subtype was not different between the PD patients with and without a family history. PD patients with a family history experienced significantly fewer falls/cardiovascular symptoms within the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale domains (p = 0.001) compared to their counterparts, although this was not statistically significant upon adjusting for age (p = 0.119). Conclusions: In de novo PD patients, having a family history of PD is associated with a younger age at diagnosis and more severe rigidity.

Background and Objectives: Apathy and sleep problems are frequently observed among non-motor symptoms (NMSs) in Parkinson’s disease (PD), but the relationship between the two has not been well investigated. This study aimed to determine the extent to which apathy and sleep disturbances are present in people with early PD and whether apathy affects sleep quality. Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with early PD, defined as modified Hoehn and Yahr (mHY) stages 1-3 and a disease duration of no more than 5 years, were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were collected, and motor and NMSs including apathy and sleep disturbance were investigated with relevant scales. Results: Of 302 patients with PD, apathy was found in 97 (32.1%) patients. Patients with apathetic PD had significantly less formal education, a more advanced mHY stage, and higher scores on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part II, total Non-Motor Symptom Scale (NMSS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global scores than patients with non-apathetic PD. The PSQI global score showed significant associations with years of education, UPDRS-II, total NMSS, Mini-Mental State Examination, BDI, and AES scores. For each component of the PSQI, only sleep latency was different between patients with apathetic and non-apathetic PD. Partial correlation analyses for determining the association between apathy and sleep disturbance revealed a significant positive correlation. Conclusions: Apathy is common and associated with poor sleep quality in patients with early PD. These findings suggest that recognizing and addressing apathy may be relevant for managing sleep disturbances in this population.

Background and Objectives: Head trauma (HT) has been suggested as a risk factor for Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its impact on the motor and non-motor manifestations remains unclear. We investigated whether patients with early PD and a history of HT differ from those without HT in terms of their motor and non-motor symptom profiles. Materials and Methods: We enrolled patients with early PD (disease duration of ≤5 years, modified Hoehn and Yahr stages [mHY] 1–3). HT history was ascertained by structured questionnaire. Motor and non-motor symptoms were evaluated using standardized clinical rating scales. Motor subtypes—tremor-dominant (TD), akinetic-rigid (AR), and mixed—were determined according to established criteria based on the tremor-to-AR score ratio. Subtype distribution and motor scores were compared between HT and non-HT groups using univariate tests, mHY-adjusted ANCOVA, and multivariable models adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, education, mHY stage, MMSE, and BDI score. Results: Of 237 patients, 35 (14.8%) reported HT. The HT group had a higher mHY stage than the non-HT group and showed lower total and rest tremor scores on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, whereas rigidity scores were similar. Bradykinesia and gait/posture scores tended to be higher in the HT group, but these differences did not persist after adjustment for disease severity. The TD subtype was less frequent in the HT group than in the non-HT group (5.7% vs. 30.2%), whereas the AR subtype was more common (82.9% vs. 61.9%). The categorical subtype redistribution remained significant after multivariable adjustment (adjusted OR for AR vs. TD = 4.61, 95% CI 1.28–16.67). No detectable between-group difference in non-motor symptom burden was observed. Conclusions: In this single-center cross-sectional cohort, a self-reported history of HT in early PD was associated with a redistribution of motor phenotype categories toward AR-predominant presentations, with no detectable difference in non-motor symptom burden. Given the retrospective binary exposure assessment, these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, and prospective studies with structured exposure ascertainment are needed to clarify how HT may shape PD motor phenotype expression.