Plant viruses depend on host cellular factors for their replication and movement. There are cellular proteins that change their localization and/or expression and have a proviral role or antiviral activity and interact with or target viral proteins. Identification of those proteins and their roles during infection is crucial for understanding plant–virus interactions and to design antiviral resistance in crops. Important host proteins have been identified using approaches such as tag-dependent immunoprecipitation or yeast two hybridization that require cloning individual proteins or the entire virus. However, the number of possible interactions between host and viral proteins is immense. Therefore, an alternative method is needed for proteome-wide identification of host proteins involved in host–virus interactions. Here, we present cell fractionation coupled with mass spectrometry as an option to identify protein–protein interactions between viruses and their hosts. This approach involves separating subcellular organelles using differential and/or gradient centrifugation from virus-free and virus-infected cells (1) followed by comparative analysis of the proteomic profiles obtained for each subcellular organelle via mass spectrometry (2). After biological validation, prospect host proteins with proviral or antiviral roles can be subject to fundamental studies in the context of basic biology to shed light on both virus replication and cellular processes. They can also be targeted via gene editing to develop virus-resistant crops.

The genus Tobamovirus belongs to the family Virgaviridae, and the genome consists of monopartite, positive, single-strand RNA. Most species contain four open reading frames encoding four essential proteins. Transmission occurs primarily through mechanical contact between plants, and in some cases, via seed dispersal. Tobamovirus fructirugosum (tomato brown rugose fruit virus, ToBRFV), the most recently described species in the genus, was first reported in 2015. It overcame genetic resistance that had been effective in tomato for sixty years, causing devastating losses in tomato production worldwide, and highlights the importance of understanding Tobamovirus genomic variation and evolution. In this study, we measured and characterized nucleotide variation for the entire genome and for all species in the genus Tobamovirus. Additionally, we measured the selection pressure acting on each open reading frame. Results showed that low nucleotide diversity and negative selection pressure are general features of tobamoviruses, with values that are approximately the same across open reading frames and without hypervariable areas. A comparison of nucleotide diversity between T. fructirugosum and its close relatives, T. tomatotessellati (tomato mosaic virus, ToMV) and T. tabaci (tobacco mosaic virus, TMV), showed low nucleotide diversity in the movement protein region harboring the resistance-breaking mutation. Furthermore, phylogenetic and diversity analyses showed that T. fructirugosum continues to evolve, and geographical distribution and host influence genomic diversity.

The genus Tobamovirus belongs to the family Virgaviridae, and the genome consists of monopartite, positive, single-strand RNA. Most species have four open reading frames encoding four essential proteins. Transmission occurs by mechanical contact between plants and sometimes by seed. Tobamovirus fructirugosum (Tomato brown rugose fruit virus, ToBRFV) is the most recent species in the genus, was first reported in 2015, broke genetic resistance that had been effective in tomato for sixty years, has caused devastating damage to tomato production worldwide, and highlights the importance of understanding genomic variation and evolution of tobamoviruses. In this study, we measured and characterized nucleotide variation for the entire genome and for all species in the genus Tobamovirus and measured the selection pressure acting on each open reading frame. Results showed that low nucleotide diversity and negative selection pressure are general features of tobamoviruses, with values that are approximately the same across open reading frames and without hypervariable areas. A comparison of nucleotide diversity between T. fructirugosum and its close relatives, T. tomatotessellati (Tomato mosaic virus, ToMV) and T. tabaci (Tobacco mosaic virus, TMV), showed low nucleotide diversity in the movement protein region harboring the resistance-breaking mutation. Furthermore, phylogenetic and diversity analyses showed that T. fructirugosum continues to evolve, and geographical distribution and host influence genomic diversity.

Potyvirus rapae (turnip mosaic virus, TuMV) is widely used as a model system in plant–virus interaction studies. The TuMV RNA genome encodes 11 proteins, some of which remain poorly characterized, while the functions of others are well defined. Studying individual proteins in isolation may not recapitulate native expression levels, subcellular localization, and interaction with host factors during virus replication and movement. An alternative approach is to tag individual viral proteins in the context of an infectious clone. Epitope tags may alter protein functions and affect viral replication, movement, or a combination of essential steps, thus leading to changes in pathogenicity. Because they have central roles in viral infection, here we measured the effect of individually tagging the helper component proteinase (HC-Pro) and nuclear inclusion protein b (NIb) with a 6His-3xFLAG tag. Epitope tags were placed at the N-terminus of HC-Pro and the N- and C-termini of NIb within a TuMV infectious clone carrying coding sequences for the green fluorescent protein (TuMV-GFP). Constructs carrying a tagged HC-Pro displayed pathogenicity similar to that observed for TuMV-GFP in Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis thaliana plants. In contrast, infectivity of NIb-tagged clones became temperature sensitive and, even at the permissive temperature, showed reduced pathogenicity compared to TuMV-GFP. Providing a silencing suppressor in trans did not restore infection efficiency, suggesting reduced viral fitness due to structural or functional disruption caused by the epitope tags. Structural models generated using AlphaFold2 showed no effect of the tag on HC-Pro. In contrast, structural models illustrated tag interference with the NIb catalytic site. AlphaFold2 was further used to predict the structural impact of several tags on NIb and to predict the effect of a 6HIS-3xFlag tag on all other TuMV proteins. This study provides a broadly applicable framework for selecting suitable epitope tags to mark viral proteins and maintain function in the context of virus infection.