Objective: To determine the clinical outcomes of older COVID-19 patients who received DMB compared to those who did not. We hypothesized that fewer patients administered DMB would require oxygen therapy and/or intensive care support than those who did not. Methodology: Cohort observational study of all consecutive hospitalized COVID-19 patients aged 50 and above in a tertiary academic hospital who received DMB compared to a recent cohort who did not. Patients were administered oral vitamin D3 1000 IU OD, magnesium 150mg OD and vitamin B12 500mcg OD (DMB) upon admission if they did not require oxygen therapy. Primary outcome was deterioration post-DMB administration leading to any form of oxygen therapy and/or intensive care support. Results: Between 15 January and 15 April 2020, 43 consecutive COVID-19 patients aged ≥50 were identified. 17 patients received DMB and 26 patients did not. Baseline demographic characteristics between the two groups was significantly different in age. In univariate analysis, age and hypertension showed significant influence on outcome while DMB retained protective significance after adjusting for age or hypertension separately in multivariate analysis. Fewer DMB patients than controls required initiation of oxygen therapy during their hospitalization (17.6% vs 61.5%, P=0.006). DMB exposure was associated with odds ratios of 0.13 (95% CI: 0.03 – 0.59) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.04 – 0.93) for oxygen therapy and/or intensive care support on univariate and multivariate analyses respectively. Conclusions: DMB combination in older COVID-19 patients was associated with a significant reduction in proportion of patients with clinical deterioration requiring oxygen support and/or intensive care support. This study supports further larger randomized control trials to ascertain the full benefit of DMB in ameliorating COVID-19 severity.

At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increase in the use of antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infection (CA-ARI) in patients admitted for suspected or confirmed COVID-19, raising concerns for misuse. These antibiotics are not under the usual purview of the antimicrobial stewardship unit (ASU). Serum procalcitonin, a biomarker to distinguish viral from bacterial infections, can be used to guide antibiotic recommendations in suspected lower respiratory tract infection. We modified our stewardship approach, and used a procalcitonin-guided strategy to identify “high yield” interventions for audits in patients admitted with CA-ARI. With this approach, there was an increase in the proportion of patients with antibiotics discontinued within 4 days (16.5% vs. 34.9%, p < 0.001), and the overall duration of antibiotic therapy was significantly shorter [7 (6–8) vs. 6 (3–8) days, p < 0.001]. There was a significant decrease in patients with intravenous-to-oral switch of antibiotics to “complete the course” (45.3% vs. 34.4%, p < 0.05). Of the patients who had antibiotics discontinued, none were restarted on antibiotics within 48 h, and there was no-30-day readmission or 30-day mortality attributed to respiratory infection. This study illustrates the importance of the antimicrobial stewardship during the pandemic and the need for ASU to remain attuned to prescriber’s practices, and adapt accordingly to address antibiotic misuse to curb antimicrobial resistance.

Invasive Fusarium infections pose a significant threat to immunocompromised patients and are characterised by high mortality rates. In this study, we examined 22 unique episodes of proven and probable Fusarium infections over a 14-year period at a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Cases were analysed from clinical, microbiological, and radiological perspectives. The most common risk factor for invasive Fusarium infections was hematologic malignancy. Fifty percent of patients achieved resolution of infection and were alive at the end of treatment. Conversely, the overall mortality was 50%, with 90% of deaths occurring within three months of the diagnosis of invasive fusariosis; associated risk factors include neutropenia, disseminated infection, and corticosteroid use. Although these deaths would be classified as treatment failures by established criteria; many (8/10; 80%) were due to causes not directly related to invasive fusariosis; such as progression of the underlying malignancy or another infection. We believe that it may be time to redefine how we assess treatment outcomes for invasive mould infections. Nevertheless; invasive fusariosis remains a formidable foe in the immunocompromised host. Early; aggressive treatment with appropriate adjunctive therapies; such as surgery; is crucial for controlling the infection and achieving the best outcomes.