The KnotProt 2.0 database (the updated version of the KnotProt database) collects information about proteins which form knots and other entangled structures. New features in KnotProt 2.0 include the characterization of both probabilistic and deterministic entanglements which can be formed by disulfide bonds and interactions via ions, a refined characterization of entanglement in terms of knotoids, the identification of the so-called cysteine knots, the possibility to analyze all or a non-redundant set of proteins, and various technical updates. The KnotProt 2.0 database classifies all entangled proteins, represents their complexity in the form of a knotting fingerprint, and presents many biological and geometrical statistics based on these results. Currently the database contains >2000 entangled structures, and it regularly self-updates based on proteins deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB).

The fact that proteins can have their chain formed in a knot is known for almost 30 years. However, as they are not common, only a fraction of such proteins is available in the Protein Data Bank. It was not possible to assess their importance and versatility up until now because we did not have access to the whole proteome of an organism, let alone a human one. The arrival of efficient machine learning methods for protein structure prediction, such as AlphaFold and RoseTTaFold, changed that. We analyzed all proteins from the human proteome (over 20,000) determined with AlphaFold in search for knots and found them in less than 2% of the structures. Using a variety of methods, including homolog search, clustering, quality assessment, and visual inspection, we determined the nature of each of the knotted structures and classified it as either knotted, potentially knotted, or an artifact, and deposited all of them in a database available at: https://knotprot.cent.uw.edu.pl/alphafold. Overall, we found 51 credible knotted proteins (0.2% of human proteome). The set of potentially knotted structures includes a new complex type of a knot not reported in proteins yet. That knot type, denoted 6₃ in mathematical notation, would necessitate a more complex folding path than any knotted protein characterized to date.

Macromolecular X-ray crystallography (XRC), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) are the primary techniques for determining atomic-level, three-dimensional structures of macromolecules essential for drug discovery. With advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and cryoEM, the Protein Data Bank (PDB) is solidifying its role as a key resource for 3D macromolecular structures. These developments underscore the growing need for enhanced quality metrics and robust validation standards for experimental structures. This review examines recent advancements in cryoEM for drug discovery, analyzing structure quality metrics, resolution improvements, metal-ligand and water molecule identification, and refinement software. It compares cryoEM with other techniques like XRC and NMR, emphasizing the global expansion of cryoEM facilities and its increasing significance in drug discovery. CryoEM is revolutionizing structural biology and drug discovery, particularly for large, complex structures in induced proximity and antibody-antigen interactions. It supports vaccine design, CAR T-cell optimization, gene editing, and gene therapy. Combined with AI, cryoEM enhances particle identification and 3D structure determination. With recent breakthroughs, cryoEM is emerging as a crucial tool in drug discovery, driving the development of new, effective therapies.

The availability of 3D protein models is rapidly increasing with the development of structure prediction algorithms. With the expanding availability of data, new ways of analysis, especially topological analysis, of those predictions are becoming necessary. Here, we present the updated version of the AlphaKnot service that provides a straightforward way of analyzing structure topology. It was designed specifically to determine knot types of the predicted structure models, however, it can be used for all structures, including the ones solved experimentally. AlphaKnot 2.0 provides the user’s ability to obtain the knowledge necessary to assess the topological correctness of the model. Both probabilistic and deterministic knot detection methods are available, together with various visualizations (including a trajectory of simplification steps to highlight the topological complexities). Moreover, the web server provides a list of proteins similar to the queried model within AlphaKnot’s database and returns their knot types for direct comparison. We pre-calculated the topology of high-quality models from the AlphaFold Database (4th version) and there are now more than 680.000 knotted models available in the AlphaKnot database. AlphaKnot 2.0 is available at https://alphaknot.cent.uw.edu.pl/.

The ‘Genus for biomolecules’ database (http://genus.fuw.edu.pl) collects information about topological structure and complexity of proteins and RNA chains, which is captured by the genus of a given chain and its subchains. For each biomolecule, this information is shown in the form of a genus trace plot, as well as a genus matrix diagram. We assemble such information for all and RNA structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). This database presents also various statistics and extensive information about the biological function of the analyzed biomolecules. The database is regularly self-updating, once new structures are deposited in the PDB. Moreover, users can analyze their own structures.

Knotted proteins, although scarce, are crucial structural components of certain protein families, and their roles continue to be a topic of intense research. Capitalizing on the vast collection of protein structure predictions offered by AlphaFold (AF), this study computationally examines the entire UniProt database to create a robust dataset of knotted and unknotted proteins. Utilizing this dataset, we develop a machine learning (ML) model capable of accurately predicting the presence of knots in protein structures solely from their amino acid sequences. We tested the model's capabilities on 100 proteins whose structures had not yet been predicted by AF and found agreement with our local prediction in 92% cases. From the point of view of structural biology, we found that all potentially knotted proteins predicted by AF can be classified only into 17 families. This allows us to discover the presence of unknotted proteins in families with a highly conserved knot. We found only three new protein families: UCH, DUF4253, and DUF2254, that contain both knotted and unknotted proteins, and demonstrate that deletions within the knot core could potentially account for the observed unknotted (trivial) topology. Finally, we have shown that in the majority of knotted families (11 out of 15), the knotted topology is strictly conserved in functional proteins with very low sequence similarity. We have conclusively demonstrated that proteins AF predicts as unknotted are structurally accurate in their unknotted configurations. However, these proteins often represent nonfunctional fragments, lacking significant portions of the knot core (amino acid sequence).