There are no approved treatments for chronic antibody mediated rejection (ABMR). We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind clinical trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) combined with rituximab (RTX) (EudraCT 2010‐023746‐67). Patients with transplant glomerulopathy and anti‐HLA donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) were eligible. Patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <20 mL/min per 1.73m² and/or severe interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive IVIG (4 doses of 0.5 g/kg) and RTX (375 mg/m²) or a wrapped isovolumetric saline infusion. Primary efficacy variable was the decline of eGFR at one year. Secondary efficacy variables included evolution of proteinuria, renal lesions, and DSA at 1 year. The planned sample size was 25 patients per group. During 2012‐2015, 25 patients were randomized (13 to the treatment and 12 to the placebo group). The planned patient enrollment was not achieved because of budgetary constraints and slow patient recruitment. There were no differences between the treatment and placebo groups in eGFR decline (−4.2 ± 14.4 vs. −6.6 ± 12.0 mL/min per 1.73 m², P‐value = .475), increase of proteinuria (+0.9 ± 2.1 vs. +0.9 ± 2.1 g/day, P‐value = .378), Banff scores at one year and MFI of the immunodominant DSA. Safety was similar between groups. These data suggest that the combination of IVIG and RTX is not useful in patients displaying transplant glomerulopathy and DSA.

Whether antibiotic treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) can prevent acute graft pyelonephritis (AGP) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients has not been elucidated. In this multicenter, randomized, open-labed, nonblinded, prospective, non-inferiority, controlled trial, we compared antibiotic treatment with no treatment for AB in KT recipients in the first year after transplantation when urinary catheters had been removed. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of AGP. Secondary endpoints included bacteremic AGP, cystitis, susceptibility of urine isolates, graft rejection, renal function, graft loss, opportunistic infections, need for hospitalization, and mortality. We enrolled 205 KT recipients between 2013 and 2015. AB occurred in 41 (42.3%) and 46 (50.5%) patients in the treatment and notreatment groups, respectively. There were no differences in the primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population (12.2% [5 of 41] in the treatment group vs. 8.7% [4 of 46] in the no treatment group; risk ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 0.40-4.87) or the per-protocol population (13.8% [4 of 29] in the treatment group vs. 6.7% [3 of 45] in the no treatment group; risk difference 2.07, 95% confidence interval 0.50-8.58). No differences were found in secondary endpoints, except for antibiotic susceptibility. Fosfomycin (p=0.030) and amoxicillin-clavulanic (p<0.001) resistance, and extended-spectrum β-lactamase production (p=0.044), were more common in KT recipients receiving antibiotic treatment for AB. Antibiotic treatment of AB was not useful to prevent AGP in KT recipients, and may increase antibiotic resistance. However, our findings should be regarded with caution, due to the small sample size analyzed.

Risk factors for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) after kidney transplantation have been poorly explored. We performed a multinational case–control study that included 51 kidney transplant (KT) recipients diagnosed with early (first 180 posttransplant days) IPA at 19 institutions between 2000 and 2013. Control recipients were matched (1:1 ratio) by center and date of transplantation. Overall mortality among cases was 60.8%, and 25.0% of living recipients experienced graft loss. Pretransplant diagnosis of chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD; odds ratio [OR]: 9.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–90.58; p = 0.041) and delayed graft function (OR: 3.40; 95% CI: 1.08–10.73; p = 0.037) were identified as independent risk factors for IPA among those variables already available in the immediate peritransplant period. The development of bloodstream infection (OR: 18.76; 95% CI: 1.04–339.37; p = 0.047) and acute graft rejection (OR: 40.73, 95% CI: 3.63–456.98; p = 0.003) within the 3 mo prior to the diagnosis of IPA acted as risk factors during the subsequent period. In conclusion, pretransplant COPD, impaired graft function and the occurrence of serious posttransplant infections may be useful to identify KT recipients at the highest risk of early IPA. Future studies should explore the potential benefit of antimold prophylaxis in this group.

Limited sampling strategies have been developed to predict full AUCs. The goal of this study was to develop a limited sampling strategy to estimate the AUC of tacrolimus in adult renal transplant patients and to evaluate its predictive performance in an independent patient population. A total of 27 tacrolimus pharmacokinetic profiles were studied. Blood samples were collected before the dose (0) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose. The study was divided into 2 phases. In phase 1, the goal was to obtain a sampling strategy from 14 pharmacokinetic profiles. In phase 2, the bias and precision of the model were evaluated in another 13 pharmacokinetic profiles. The best correlation was achieved at 4 hours after dose (r(2) = 0.790). Stepwise multiple regression analysis determined that the abbreviated AUC at 0, 1, and 4 hours could accurately predict total AUC (r(2) = 0.965). The following formula was developed: AUC = 8.90 + 4.0C0h+ 1.77C1h + 5.47C4h. No significant differences were found between calculated and estimated AUC (165.6 +/- 41.1 and 166.7 +/- 43.2 ng.h/mL, respectively). The mean prediction error (MPE), the relative prediction error (PE), and the mean squared error (MSE) were 0.48 ng.h/mL, 0.16%, and 40.0 ng.h/mL, respectively. The limited sampling with use of the 3 levels at 0, 1, and 4 hours postdose provides accurate, reliable determination of tacrolimus AUC in renal transplant patients.