Liang Gao

Dr. Liang Gao

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 November 2019 in Advanced Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHenning Madry
Henning Madry
LGLiang Gao
Liang Gao
ARAna Rey‐Rico
Ana Rey‐Rico
JVJagadeesh K. Venkatesan
Jagadeesh K. Venkatesan
KMKathrin Müller‐Brandt
Kathrin Müller‐Brandt
Magali CucchiariniMagali Cucchiarini
Magali Cucchiarini
Advanced biomaterial‐guided delivery of gene vectors is an emerging and highly attractive therapeutic solution for targeted articular cartilage repair, allowing for a controlled and minimally invasive delivery of gene vectors in a spatiotemporally precise manner, reducing intra‐articular vector spread and possible loss of the therapeutic gene product. As far as it is known, the very first successful in vivo application of such a biomaterial‐guided delivery of a potent gene vector in an orthotopic large animal model of cartilage damage is reported here. In detail, an injectable and thermosensitive hydrogel based on poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)–poly(propylene oxide) (PPO)–PEO poloxamers, capable of controlled release of a therapeutic recombinant adeno‐associated virus (rAAV) vector overexpressing the chondrogenic sox9 transcription factor in full‐thickness chondral defects, is applied in a clinically relevant minipig model in vivo. These comprehensive analyses of the entire osteochondral unit with multiple standardized evaluation methods indicate that rAAV‐FLAG‐hsox9/PEO–PPO–PEO hydrogel‐augmented microfracture significantly improves cartilage repair with a collagen fiber orientation more similar to the normal cartilage and protects the subchondral bone plate from early bone loss.

18 January 2019 in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
POPatrick Orth
Patrick Orth
LGLiang Gao
Liang Gao
Henning MadryHenning Madry
Henning Madry

21 November 2017 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLiang Gao
Liang Gao
POPatrick Orth
Patrick Orth
MCMagali Cucchiarini
Magali Cucchiarini
Henning MadryHenning Madry
Henning Madry
Background: The addition of a type I/III collagen membrane in cartilage defects treated with microfracture has been advocated for cartilage repair, termed “autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis” (AMIC). Purpose: To examine the current clinical evidence regarding AMIC for focal chondral defects. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library databases. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies of AMIC for articular cartilage repair, written in English. Relative data were extracted and critically analyzed. PRISMA guidelines were applied, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by the modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS), and aggregate data were generated. Results: Twenty-eight clinical articles were included: 12 studies (245 patients) of knee cartilage defects, 12 studies (214 patients) of ankle cartilage defects, and 4 studies (308 patients) of hip cartilage defects. The CMS demonstrated a suboptimal study design in the majority of published studies (knee, 57.8; ankle, 55.3; hip, 57.7). For the knee, 1 study reported significant clinical improvements for AMIC compared with microfracture for medium-sized cartilage defects (mean defect size 3.6 cm 2 ) after 5 years (level of evidence, 1). No study compared AMIC with matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in the knee. For the ankle, no clinical trial was available comparing AMIC versus microfracture or ACI. In the hip, only one analysis (level of evidence, 3) compared AMIC with microfracture for acetabular lesions. For medium-sized acetabular defects, one study (level of evidence, 3) found no significant differences between AMIC and ACI at 5 years. Specific aspects not appropriately discussed in the currently available literature include patient-related factors, membrane fixation, and defect properties. No treatment-related adverse events were reported. Conclusion: This systematic review reveals a paucity of high-quality, randomized controlled studies testing the AMIC technique versus established procedures such as microfracture or ACI. Evidence is insufficient to recommend joint-specific indications for AMIC. Additional nonbiased, high-powered, randomized controlled clinical trials will provide better clinical and structural long-term evidence, thus helping to define possible indications for this technique.

18 May 2017 in Stem Cells International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Henning MadryHenning Madry
Henning Madry
LGLiang Gao
Liang Gao
HEHermann Eichler
Hermann Eichler
POPatrick Orth
Patrick Orth
Magali CucchiariniMagali Cucchiarini
Magali Cucchiarini
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from bone marrow play a critical role in osteochondral repair. A bone marrow clot forms within the cartilage defect either as a result of marrow stimulation or during the course of the spontaneous repair of osteochondral defects. Mobilized pluripotent MSCs from the subchondral bone migrate into the defect filled with the clot, differentiate into chondrocytes and osteoblasts, and form a repair tissue over time. The additional application of a bone marrow aspirate (BMA) to the procedure of marrow stimulation is thought to enhance cartilage repair as it may provide both an additional cell population capable of chondrogenesis and a source of growth factors stimulating cartilage repair. Moreover, the BMA clot provides a three-dimensional environment, possibly further supporting chondrogenesis and protecting the subchondral bone from structural alterations. The purpose of this review is to bridge the gap in our understanding between the basic science knowledge on MSCs and BMA and the clinical and technical aspects of marrow stimulation-based cartilage repair by examining available data on the role and mechanisms of MSCs and BMA in osteochondral repair. Implications of findings from both translational and clinical studies using BMA concentrate-enhanced marrow stimulation are discussed.

1 January 2018 in Disease Models & Mechanisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLiang Gao
Liang Gao
LGLars K. H. Goebel
Lars K. H. Goebel
POPatrick Orth
Patrick Orth
Magali CucchiariniMagali Cucchiarini
Magali Cucchiarini
Henning MadryHenning Madry
Henning Madry
Articular cartilage defects may initiate osteoarthritis. Subchondral drilling, a widely applied clinical technique to treat small cartilage defects, does not yield cartilage regeneration. Various translational studies aiming to improve the outcome of drilling have been performed, however, a robust systematic analysis of its translational evidence has been still lacking. Here, we performed a systematic review of the outcome of subchondral drilling for knee cartilage repair in translational animal models. A total of 12 relevant publications studying 198 animals were identified, detailed study characteristics were extracted, and methodological quality and risk of bias were analyzed. Subchondral drilling was superior to defects untreated or treated with abrasion arthroplasty for cartilage repair in multiple translational models. Considerable subchondral bone changes were observed, including subchondral bone cysts and intralesional osteophytes. Furthermore, extensive alterations of the subchondral bone microarchitecture appeared in a temporal pattern in small and large animal models, together with specific topographic aspects of repair. Moreover, variable technical aspects directly affected the outcomes of osteochondral repair. The data from this systematic review indicate that subchondral drilling yields improved short-term structural articular cartilage repair compared with spontaneous repair in multiple small and large animal models. These results have important implications for future investigations aimed at an enhanced translation into clinical settings for the treatment of cartilage defects, highlighting the importance of considering specific aspects of modifiable variables such as improvements in the design and reporting of preclinical studies, together with the need to better understand the underlying mechanisms of cartilage repair following subchondral drilling.

1 January 2019 in Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLiang Gao
Liang Gao
Henning MadryHenning Madry
Henning Madry
DCDmitrii V. Chugaev
Dmitrii V. Chugaev
MDMatteo Denti
Matteo Denti
AFAleksandr Frolov
Aleksandr Frolov
AKAndrey Korolev
Andrey Korolev
Corrective lower limb osteotomies are innovative and efficient therapeutic procedures for restoring axial alignment and managing unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. This review presents critical insights into the up‐dated clinical knowledge on osteotomies for complex posttraumatic or congenital lower limb deformities with a focus on high tibial osteotomies, including a comprehensive overview of basic principles of osteotomy planning, biomechanical considerations of different implants for osteotomies and insights in specific bone deformity correction techniques. Emphasis is placed on complex cases of lower limb osteotomies associated with ligament and multiaxial instability including pediatric cases, computer‐assisted navigation, external fixation for long bone deformity correction and return to sport after such osteotomies. Altogether, these advances in the experimental and clinical knowledge of complex lower limb osteotomies allow generating improved, adapted therapeutic regimens to treat congenital and acquired lower limb deformities.