Superinfections are a fundamental critical care problem, and their significance in severe COVID-19 cases needs to be determined. This study analyzed data from the Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2-Infected Patients (LEOSS) cohort focusing on intensive care patients. A retrospective analysis of patient data from 840 cases of COVID-19 with critical courses demonstrated that co-infections were frequently present and were primarily of nosocomial origin. Furthermore, our analysis showed that invasive therapy procedures accompanied an increased risk for healthcare-associated infections. Non-ventilated ICU patients were rarely affected by secondary infections. The risk of infection, however, increased even when non-invasive ventilation was used. A further, significant increase in infection rates was seen with the use of invasive ventilation and even more so with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy. The marked differences among ICU techniques used for the treatment of COVID-19-induced respiratory failure in terms of secondary infection risk profile should be taken into account for the optimal management of critically ill COVID-19 patients, as well as for adequate antimicrobial therapy.

Background: The value of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in cardiogenic shock, especially the combination of the ECMELLA approach (Impella combined with ECMO), remains controversial. Case presentation: A previously healthy 33-year-old female patient was submitted to a local emergency department with a flu-like infection and febrile temperatures up to 39 °C. The patient was tested positive for type-A influenza, however negative for SARS-CoV-2. Despite escalated invasive ventilation, refractory hypercapnia (paCO₂: 22 kPa) with severe respiratory acidosis (pH: 6.9) and a rising norepinephrine rate occurred within a few hours. Due to a Horovitz-Index < 100, out-of-centre veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO)-implantation was performed. A CT-scan done because of anisocoria revealed an extended dissection of the right vertebral artery. While the initial left ventricular function was normal, echocardiography revealed severe global hypokinesia. After angiographic exclusion of coronary artery stenoses, we geared up LV unloading by additional implantation of an Impella CP and expanded the vv-ECMO to a veno-venous-arterial ECMO (vva-ECMO). Clinically relevant bleeding from the punctured femoral arteries resulted in massive transfusion and was treated by vascular surgery later on. Under continued MCS, LVEF increased to approximately 40% 2 days after the initiation of ECMELLA. After weaning, the Impella CP was explanted at day 5 and the vva-ECMO was removed on day 9, respectively. The patient was discharged in an unaffected neurological condition to rehabilitation 25 days after the initial admission. Conclusions: This exceptional case exemplifies the importance of aggressive MCS in severe cardiogenic shock, which may be especially promising in younger patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and potentially reversible causes of cardiogenic shock. This case impressively demonstrates that especially young patients may achieve complete neurological restoration, even though the initial prognosis may appear unfavourable.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, large numbers of elderly, multimorbid people required treatment in intensive care units. This study investigated how the inherent patient factors age and comorbidity burden affected the treatment strategy and the outcome achieved. Retrospective analysis of data from intensive care patients enrolled in the Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV2-Infected Patients (LEOSS) cohort found that a patient’s age and comorbidity burden in fact influenced their mortality rate and the use of ventilation therapy. Evidence showed that advanced age and multimorbidity were associated with the restrictive use of invasive ventilation therapies, particularly ECMO. Geriatric patients with a high comorbidity burden were clustered in the sub-cohort of non-ventilated ICU patients characterized by a high mortality rate. The risk of death generally increased with older age and accumulating comorbidity burden. Here, the more aggressive an applied procedure, the younger the age in which a majority of patients died. Clearly, geriatric, multimorbid COVID-19 patients benefit less from invasive ventilation therapies. This implies the need for a holistic approach to therapy decisions, taking into account the patient’s wishes.

Background/Objectives: Postoperative pneumonia and other infectious complications after robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy still contribute to morbidity and mortality. Selective oral decontamination of the esophagus prior to surgery might reduce the rate of infectious complications. However, its impact on the esophageal microbiota is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze whether selective oral decontamination of the esophagus prior to surgery reduces postoperative pneumonia rates and alters the esophageal microbiome. Methods: We conducted a proof-of-principle study including 22 patients who underwent robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Thirteen patients were treated with 50 mg amphotericin B, 8 mg tobramycin, and 10 mg colistin orally 7 days prior to surgery, intraoperatively, and 5 days postoperatively. The remaining nine patients received standard-of-care treatment (no oral decontamination). The esophageal microbiome was assessed using 16S rRNA gene amplicon libraries which were annotated using the Ribosomal Data Project. The incidence of postoperative (at discharge from hospital or 30 days, whichever was later) infectious complications was assessed. Results: Selective oral decontamination was associated with reduced overall rates of infectious complications (7.7% vs. 55.5%, p = 0.008) and postoperative pneumonia (0% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.007). Alterations in the esophageal microbiome depending on selective oral decontamination were detectable. The microbiomes of patients with infectious complications showed higher abundances of Neisseria and lower abundances of Streptococcus than samples without infectious complications. Conclusions: Selective oral decontamination reduced the rate of postoperative complications, postoperative pneumonia in particular, after robot-assisted esophagectomy. Alterations in the microbiome were also evident following decontamination. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm these data.

Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is a marker used to assess neurological impairment. Notwithstanding, the release of NSE into the circulation can also originate from erythrocytes and thrombocytes, signifying that even mild instances of hemolysis have the potential to induce heightened serum NSE levels. The present study addresses the question of whether the serum NSE level is a reliable parameter for assessing potential brain damage in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). To this end, NSE values of all non-resuscitated ECMO patients treated at our clinic from January 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Serum NSE levels were found to be median 35.95 µg/L, with significant intrapersonal variability during ECMO therapy. A comparative analysis in ECMO patients with and without diagnosed brain damage revealed no statistically significant differences. In contrast, the concurrent measurement of serum LDH and NSE levels exhibited a significant positive correlation (Spearman Rho 0.69), indicating that the elevated serum NSE levels exhibited by patients devoid of cerebral impairment were attributable to the occurrence of ECMO-induced hemolysis. Consequently, the prognostic value of serum NSE levels in patients undergoing ECMO is restricted. The data also demonstrate that individual measurements of serum NSE levels in ECMO patients should be regarded as snapshots with only limited significance.

Background: Unplanned ICU readmissions are associated with adverse outcomes, including mortality. However, evidence on risk factors for readmission remains inconclusive. This scoping review was conducted to summarize risk factors for unplanned ICU readmission and their association with mortality. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, PubMed and Web of Science were systematically searched up to April 21, 2026, without restrictions on language, country, or publication date. We included observational studies and systematic reviews with meta-analyses investigating risk factors for ICU readmission in adults. Data on study characteristics, readmission rates, mortality, and patient- and ward-related risk factors were extracted and summarized. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and AMSTAR 2. Results: A total of 119 observational studies and two meta-analyses were included. There was substantial heterogeneity in patient populations, specialties, study duration, and follow-up periods. Readmission rates ranged from 0.8% to 34.9%. ICU readmission was consistently associated with higher mortality. The most consistent patient-related risk factors were advanced age, a higher number of comorbidities, greater illness severity, organ support, and longer initial ICU stay. Among ward-related factors, nighttime discharge was the most consistently reported. Most observational studies achieved high scores on the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (8 or 9 points). However, this evaluation should be viewed with caution, given the predsominance of retrospective studies. Conclusions: ICU readmission is a multifactorial event influenced by patient- and ward-related factors. Key predictors include advanced age, comorbidities, prolonged organ support, and greater illness severity. Nighttime discharge was the most consistent modifiable organizational risk factor. Discharge decisions should incorporate comprehensive clinical assessment, structured planning, and appropriate post-ICU care. Future multicenter prospective studies using standardized definitions are needed to improve risk prediction and support evidence-based discharge strategies.