Ophélie RITTER

Dr. Ophélie RITTER

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 January 2023 in BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNSofia Noureddine
Sofia Noureddine
PRPauline Roux-Claudé
Pauline Roux-Claudé
LLLucie Laurent
Lucie Laurent
OROphélie RITTER
Ophélie RITTER
PDPauline Dolla
Pauline Dolla
CBCindy Barnig
Cindy Barnig
Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is an important clinical tool that provides a global assessment of the respiratory, circulatory and metabolic responses to exercise which are not adequately reflected through the measurement of individual organ system function at rest. In the context of critical COVID-19, CPET is an ideal approach for assessing long term sequelae. Methods: In this prospective single-center study, we performed CPET 12 months after symptom onset in 60 patients that had required intensive care unit treatment for a severe COVID-19 infection. Lung function at rest and chest computed tomography (CT) scan were also performed. Results: Twelve months after severe COVID-19 pneumonia, dyspnea was the most frequently reported symptom although only a minority of patients had impaired respiratory function at rest. Mild ground-glass opacities, reticulations and bronchiectasis were the most common CT scan abnormalities. The majority of the patients (80%) had a peak O2 uptake (V′O2) considered within normal limits (median peak predicted O2 uptake (V′O2) of 98% [87.2–106.3]). Length of ICU stay remained an independent predictor of V′O2. More than half of the patients with a normal peak predicted V′O2 showed ventilatory inefficiency during exercise with an abnormal increase of physiological dead space ventilation (VD/Vt) (median VD/VT of 0.27 [0.21–0.32] at anaerobic threshold (AT) and 0.29 [0.25–0.34] at peak) and a widened median peak alveolar-arterial gradient for O2 (35.2 mmHg [31.2–44.8]. Peak PetCO2 was significantly lower in subjects with an abnormal increase of VD/Vt (p = 0.001). Impairments were more pronounced in patients with dyspnea. Peak VD/Vt values were positively correlated with peak D-Dimer plasma concentrations from blood samples collected during ICU stay (r2 = 0.12; p = 0.02) and to predicted diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (r2 = − 0.15; p = 0.01). Conclusions: Twelve months after severe COVID-19 pneumonia, most of the patients had a peak V′O2 considered within normal limits but showed ventilatory inefficiency during exercise with increased dead space ventilation that was more pronounced in patients with persistent dyspnea. Trial registration: NCT04519320 (19/08/2020).

16 September 2025 in Advances in Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NRNicolas Raoul
Nicolas Raoul
LLLucie Laurent
Lucie Laurent
OROphélie RITTER
Ophélie RITTER
PRPauline Roux-Claudé
Pauline Roux-Claudé
FFFaraj Al Freijat
Faraj Al Freijat
CBCindy Barnig
Cindy Barnig
Airway involvement in eosinophilic disorders other than asthma is not well-defined, and the symptoms may be overshadowed by other more prominent eosinophilic extra-respiratory manifestations. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in diagnosing eosinophilic airway involvement in patients with persistent eosinophilia (>0.5 × 109/L). We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients with confirmed peripheral blood eosinophilia (>0.5 × 109/L) on at least two occasions one month apart. Patients with blood eosinophilia associated with known eosinophilic airway inflammatory diseases were excluded from the study. Pulmonary function testing, spirometry, and FeNO measurement were conducted. A total of 14 patients with various eosinophil-related disorders were identified, with a mean age of 65.7 years. Increased FeNO levels were associated with airflow obstruction and clinical symptoms such as coughing and wheezing. Notably, eosinophil levels were not predictive of eosinophilic airway involvement. FeNO could be a useful diagnostic tool for detecting bronchial eosinophilic airway inflammation in non-asthmatic disorders, thereby enabling appropriate treatment. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings.