Background and Purpose—: No evidence is available on the benefits of preventive suboccipital decompressive craniectomy (SDC) for patients with cerebellar infarction. The purpose of this matched case–control study was to investigate whether preventive SDC was associated with good clinical outcomes in patients with cerebellar infarction and to evaluate its predisposing factors. Methods—: Between March 2007 and September 2015, 28 patients underwent preventive SDC. We performed propensity score matching to establish a proper control group among 721 patients with cerebellar infarction during the same period. Group A (n=28) consists of those who underwent preventive SDC, and group B (n=56) consists of those who did not undergo preventive SDC. We analyzed and compared clinical outcomes between groups. Results—: Clinical outcomes were better in group A than in group B at discharge ( P =0.048) and 12-month follow-up ( P =0.030). Group B had more deaths within 12 months than group A (log-rank, P <0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that preventive SDC (odds ratio, 4.815; P =0.009) and the absence of brain stem infarction (odds ratio, 2.862; P =0.033) were independently associated with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2) at 12-month follow-up. Conclusions—: Favorable clinical outcomes including overall survival can be expected after preventive SDC in patients with a volume ratio between 0.25 and 0.33 and the absence of brain stem infarction. Among these patients, preventive SDC might be better than the best medical treatment alone.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow-diverter treatment for previously stented aneurysms has been reported to be less effective and prone to complications. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of flow diverters for recurrent aneurysms after stent-assisted coiling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent flow-diverter placement for recurrent aneurysms after stent-assisted coiling between March 2015 and March 2019 were recruited. Clinical and radiographic characteristics and clinical and angiographic outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Among 133 patients who underwent flow-diverter insertion, 17 (male/female ratio = 5:12; mean age, 53.8 years) were treated for recurrent aneurysms after stent placement with (n = 16) or without (n = 1) coiling. Eight patients initially presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage; 7, with headache; and 2, with visual field defects. Angiographic morphology included large/giant saccular in 12 patients, dissecting in 2, fusiform in 1, traumatic pseudoaneurysm in 1, and ruptured blood blister-like aneurysm in 1. The duration between the first treatment and flow-diverter placement ranged from 2 weeks to 15 months (median, 6 months). Flow-diverter placement was successful in all cases without any complications. All patients had favorable outcomes (mRS, 0–2), without any newly appearing symptoms. Aneurysms were followed up with conventional angiography at least once in 6–18 months. Sixteen aneurysms showed complete occlusion, and 1 aneurysm was enlarged. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this case series investigating flow-diverter placement for recurrent aneurysms after stent-assisted coiling suggested that the procedure is safe and effective. Further study in a larger population may be warranted.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes between endovascular treatment (EVT) and surgery of the ruptured posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms and suggest proper management strategies according to the PICA segment. We retrospectively analyzed clinical and radiological data of patients with ruptured PICA aneurysms who underwent surgery or EVT from three different institutes. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by mRS. We collected 39 consecutive patients with 39 ruptured PICA aneurysms; 26 patients were with proximal segment aneurysm and 13 patients were with distal. Of the 26 proximal PICA aneurysms, 20 aneurysms were treated with EVT and 6 aneurysms were treated with surgery. EVT seemed to have more favorable clinical outcome (mRS 0-2; mean mRS, 1.75 for EVT vs 3.50 for surgery, P = 0.152). Of the 13 distal PICA aneurysms, 7 aneurysms were treated with EVT and 6 were treated with surgery. Surgery showed more favorable clinical outcome (mean mRS, 2.63 for EVT vs 0.33 for surgery, P = 0.023) and lower procedure-related complication rate (42.9% for EVT vs 0% for surgery, P = 0.046) than EVT. For the treatment of ruptured PICA aneurysms, EVT seemed to have more favorable outcomes for proximal segment, while surgery showed more favorable outcomes for distal segment. Additional experience and follow-up are needed in a larger series to state the efficacy of this strategy.