Background Aim: Many Syrian civil war refugees are housed in carefully designed camps, however 60% of all refugees in host countries reside outside of specifically designated camps. Turkey hosts the largest number of refugees displaced in the civil war of Syria. In the present study, we aimed to illustrate healthcare services provided to Syrian refugees in Turkey. Data presented in this retrospective observational registry study was obtained from multiple sources including official websites and written communications contributed by Turkish Disaster and Emergency Management Agency(AFAD), Turkish Ministry of Health and Turkish Red Crescent as well as the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees(UNHCR). The number of refugee camps, total number of refugees housed in these camps, the demographic characteristics of the refugees and a breakdown of social and healthcare services provided in the camps including the number of healthcare professionals serving in the refugee camps were analyzed. According to data from UNHCR as of January 12, 2017, there are 4,904,021 registered refugees from Syria of which 2,854,968 (58.2%) are residing in Turkey. Organized health care services specifically for Syrian refugees in Turkey was first established in April 29, 2011 in Hatay. Preventative health services are also provided for Syrian refugees. Among refugees living in the camps 25% and 33% were not vaccinated for polio and measles respectively. The percentage of unvaccinated refugees living outside the camps were even higher for these viruses (45% for polio and 41% for measles). This poses a public health threat for the population where these refugees reside. One of the major concerns for countries hosting refugees from Syria is the introduction of infectious diseases. Of the major deficiencies in refugee health care has been preventative services. Within refugee camps, preventative services for pregnant woman, newborns and young children as well as family planning services are not at optimal levels. These services are even more restricted for refugees living outside of established camps. There have also been shortcomings in the care of the elderly and those with chronic health problems.

Objective: The Kahramanmaraş earthquakes struck the north-eastern part of Türkiye and Syria on February 6, 2023. It is well known that timely coordination and provision of emergency medical care in the field is particularly important to save lives after earthquakes. This study aimed to identify the challenges faced by medical responders on the ground.Methods: This exploratory-descriptive qualitative study was conducted in Hatay, the province most affected by the earthquakes. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews and field observations, and then analyzed using thematic analysis approach.Results: The study was carried out with 15 first responders from the medical profession. The study revealed 9 themes of challenges faced by medical responders: providing safety and security, human resources management, meeting personal needs, recording data, communication, patient transport, burial procedures, psychological acumen, and logistical problems. Some problems were resolved after 72 h and some continued until day 7.Conclusions: Inadequate organization of volunteer health workers, communication breakdowns, and logistical problems are some of the main challenges. To address these issues, satellite phones and radio systems can be promoted, as well as disaster-resilient logistical planning and better coordination of volunteers.

With the increasing use of wearable technologies (smartphones and smartwatches), it has become possible to measure vital signs outside healthcare institutions without the need for an additional medical device. With the advancement in technologies, the accuracy of vital signs measured by smartphones and smartwatches has also increased. In this study, the accuracy of smart devices in the measurement of heart rate and saturation, which are two vital signs that are difficult to detect in conditions such as hypotension were investigated. The study was prospectively conducted in a tertiary healthcare center. In hypotensive patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) and required an arterial blood gas evaluation, oxygen saturation and heart rate values measured by a smartphone, those measured with a vital signs monitor (VSM) at the time of admission to the ED and oxygen saturation values measured by a blood gas analyzer (BGA) were compared. A total of 200 patients, 117 women and 83 men, were included in the study. It was determined that the correlation coefficients of the heart rate values measured by the vital signs monitor and smartphone were in a high statistical agreement. When the saturation values measured by the vital signs monitor, smartphone, and blood gas analyzer were compared, it was found that the intra-class correlation coefficients of the saturation values measured by the smartphone with reference to the blood gas analyzer and vital signs monitor were 0.957 and 0.949, respectively, indicating an excellent agreement. Smartphones have as high efficiency as reference devices in measuring heart rate and saturation in hypotensive patients. In this way, hypotensive patients who need medical help can also have the opportunity to measure their vital parameters with their smartphones, without the need for any other medical device, before applying to the hospital or emergency health system. This may contribute to the improvement of the quality of life of the patients and the early and accurate information of the health care providers about the patient's health parameters.

To evaluate the efficacy, sensitivity and specificity of chest x-ray as a diagnostic imaging tool in management of thorax traumas. Descriptive study. Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, between December 2014 and December 2015. Case records of patients admitted to the emergency department with thoracic trauma were retrospectively analysed through the hospital database. Plain postero-anterior chest X-rays and thorax computerised tomography (CT) scans were evaluated seperately by same radiologist. Accurcy of signs of thoracic trama was determined using CT scan as gold standard. Nine of 23 pneumothorax patients were diagnosed by chest X-ray. Sensitivity and specificity of PA chest X-ray in the diagnosis of pneumothorax was 39.1% and 100%, respectively. Positive predictive values of chest X-ray for diagnosis of pneumothorax was 100% and negative predictive value was 97.1%. Twenty-four patients had pleural effusions on CT scans, while only 15 could be diagnosed in chest X-rays. Chest X-rays were 62.5% sensitive and 100% specific with positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 98.1%, respectively. Twenty of 41 rib fractures were diagnosed with X-rays. Chest x rays had a 48.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 95.6%, respectively. Chest X-ray should not be used as a sole diagnostic imaging tool for exclusion of pneumothorax, hemothorax, and lung contusion. Due to high predictive values of chest X-rays, they can be used for follow-up.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and prioritize strategies for strengthening public health system resilience for pandemics, disasters, and other emergencies using a scorecard approach. Methods: The United Nations Public Health System Resilience Scorecard (Scorecard) was applied across 5 workshops in Slovenia, Turkey, and the United States of America. The workshops focused on participants reviewing and discussing 23 questions/indicators. A Likert type scale was used for scoring with zero being the lowest and 5 the highest. The workshop scores were analyzed and discussed by participants to prioritize areas of need and develop resilience strategies. Data from all workshops were aggregated, analyzed, and interpreted to develop priorities representative of participating locations. Results: Eight themes emerged representing the need for better integration of public health and disaster management systems. These include: assessing community disease burden; embedding long-term recovery groups in emergency systems; exploring mental health care needs; examining ecosystem risks; evaluating reserve funds; identifying what crisis communication strategies worked well; providing non-medical services; and reviewing resilience of existing facilities, alternate care sites, and institutions. Conclusions: The Scorecard is an effective tool for establishing baseline resilience and prioritizing actions. The strategies identified reflect areas in most need for investment to improve public health system resilience.