Background: About 20–40% of people with Heart failure (HF) suffer from some depression, which is 4–5% greater than the overall population. This depression can lead to undesirable outcomes, including elevated mortality rate and frequent hospitalization.Purpose: The current study aims to evaluate the impact of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) on self-care and the symptoms of depression and anxiety in HF patients.Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, and Cochrane Library till 15 October 2022. All relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The data were extracted and pooled using Review Manager software (RevMan 5.4). Continuous data were pooled as mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: Our search retrieved 1146 records, and 7 studies (611 patients) were finally included. We assessed the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) as the primary outcome of the study. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17), Change in Beck Anxiety Inventory, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), and Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) were also assessed as secondary outcomes. With CBT, BDI-II showed a significant reduction after 4 to 6 months follow-up (MD = -4.87, 95% CI: [-8.06; -1.69], P = 0.003) as well as 8 to 9 months follow-up (MD = -5.71, 95% CI: [-8.95; -2.46],P = 0.0006). But no significant difference was shown with 3 months follow-up (M.D=-4.34; 95%CI: [-10.70; 2.03], P = 0.18).Conclusions: CBT has long-term (4–9 months) significant favorable outcomes decreasing anxiety and depression compared to non-CBT groups. No significant short-term (less than 3 months) impact on HF patients’ self-care, depression, or anxiety were shown.

Heart failure is a substantial global health concern that severely affects patients' quality of life. We aimed to compare the effects of early integration of palliative care (EIPC) and standard cardiac care on health status and mood of patients with non-terminal heart failure. EPCHF was a multicentre, parallel, two-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial carried out at University Hospital Bonn and University Hospital Düsseldorf in Germany. Eligible patients (aged 18 years or older) had heart failure, with New York Heart Association class II or more and NT-proBNP concentrations greater than or equal to 400 pg/mL. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive EIPC with standard cardiac care or standard cardiac care alone. Randomisation was computer-generated with allocation concealment, variable block sizes, and stratification by investigational site. The primary endpoints were health status and mood, measured every 3 months over 12 months using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care (FACIT-PAL) and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with DRKS.de, DRKS00013922. Between May 21, 2019, and Nov 15, 2021, 843 patients were assessed for eligibility, 205 of whom were enrolled (100 assigned to EIPC and 105 assigned to standard cardiac care). 143 (70%) patients were male and 62 (30%) were female. Over 12 months, both groups significantly improved in FACIT-PAL and KCCQ Overall Summary Score (OSS) with no significant differences between the groups (FACIT-PAL adjusted mean difference 0·98 points [95% CI -1·28 to 3·23]; p=0·40; KCCQ-OSS adjusted mean difference -2·06 points [-7·89 to 3·78]; p=0·49). Nine (9%) patients in the EIPC group and seven (7%) patients in the standard cardiac care group died from any cause, with no significant differences in time to death between the two groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1·32 [95% CI 0·49 to 3·54]; p=0·58). 22 (22%) patients in the EIPC group and 21 (21%) patients in the standard cardiac care group were hospitalised at least once due to heart failure, with no significant differences in time to heart-failure-related hospitalisation between the two groups (HR 1·09 [0·61 to 1·98]; p=0·77). 70 (70%) patients in the EIPC group and 62 (59%) in the standard cardiac care group had any adverse events (p=0·10). In this open-label, randomised clinical trial, standard cardiac care, featuring guideline-directed optimisation of medical therapy and regular 3-monthly follow-ups was found to be as effective as when combined with EIPC in improving health status and mood in patients with non-terminal heart failure. Future clinical practices should consider EIPC based on individual patient needs. Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at high risk of adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes. While both sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) are widely used in this population, direct evidence comparing their long-term efficacy and safety after PCI remains scarce. This meta-analysis aimed to compare cardiovascular and renal outcomes between SGLT-2i and DPP-4i in patients with T2DM post-PCI. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through June 2025. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, worsening renal function, and heart failure. We included primary studies and assessed the quality of studies using Newcastle Ottawa Scale. RevMan software was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random-effects model. Results: We analyzed the outcomes between SGLT-2i ( n = 7,025 patients) and DPP-4i ( n = 7,459 patients). The mean age was 62.7 years, and 77.4% were males. SGLT-2i significantly reduced all-cause mortality (HR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.54–0.79; P < 0.001) and the risk of worsening renal function (HR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.09–0.26; P < 0.001). They also demonstrated a significant reduction in heart failure events (HR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.48–0.74; P < 0.001). For myocardial infarction, a non-significant trend toward risk reduction with SGLT-2i was observed (HR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72–1.02; P = 0.08). For cerebrovascular accidents and the need for repeat revascularization (PCI/CABG), no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: SGLT-2i demonstrates more clinical benefits, and current evidence supports its initiation over DPP-4i in T2DM patients after PCI.

Background: Mitral regurgitation (MR) presents either as primary or secondary, with options for surgical or transcatheter repair. Thromboembolic risks following surgery are significant despite the use of antithrombotic medications, and guidelines for postoperative anticoagulation therapy lack consistency. This systematic review aims to compare antithrombotic medications after mitral valve repair (MVR). In this study, we intend to compare antithrombotic medications after MVR. Materials and methods: The study followed the Cochrane handbook and PRISMA guidelines. We systematically searched databases (PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, Cochrane, Web of Science) until June 2024 for TMVR studies using specific criteria. Quality assessment utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Data extraction encompassed study characteristics and outcomes. Primary outcomes included thromboembolic events and bleeding within six months. Statistical analysis employed R software to assess heterogeneity and publication bias. Results: From the 121 articles screened, 12 were included in the study. These cohort studies, involving 20,644 participants, spanned from 2008 to 2022. While most studies were of good to high quality, some exhibited lower quality. Analysis favored oral anticoagulants (OAC) over single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) for reducing bleeding risk (RR = 0.31, 95% CI: [0.11–0.87], P < 0.05), with moderate heterogeneity. Thromboembolic events did not significantly differ among interventions. Transient ischemic attacks and stroke outcomes were similar between SAPT and vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Six-month mortality rates were comparable between SAPT and VKA, with notable heterogeneity and higher mortality with SAPT in one study. Qualitative synthesis highlighted procedural success rates and bleeding complications across different interventions in transcatheter mitral valve repair studies. Conclusion: OACs showed a lower risk of bleeding compared to antiplatelet therapies, while VKAs and OAC + SAPT may reduce thromboembolic events. No significant differences were found in stroke, TIA, or short-term mortality. These findings support individualized therapy and highlight the need for further randomized trials.