Tiziano Baroni

Prof. Tiziano Baroni


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2001 in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ARAntonio Rulli
Antonio Rulli
LCLuciano Carli
Luciano Carli
Rita RomaniRita Romani
Rita Romani
TBTiziano Baroni
Tiziano Baroni
EGElvio Giovannini
Elvio Giovannini
VTVincenzo Talesa
Vincenzo Talesa

1 January 1999 in Bioelectromagnetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMonica De Mattei
Monica De Mattei
ACAngelo Caruso
Angelo Caruso
GTGian Carlo Traina
Gian Carlo Traina
FPFurio Pezzetti
Furio Pezzetti
TBTiziano Baroni
Tiziano Baroni
VSVincenzo Sollazzo
Vincenzo Sollazzo

1 May 2005 in Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FCFrancesco Carinci
Francesco Carinci
FPFurio Pezzetti
Furio Pezzetti
PLPaola Locci
Paola Locci
EBEnnio Becchetti
Ennio Becchetti
FCFriedrick Carls
Friedrick Carls
MBMaria Bodo
Maria Bodo
Apert and Crouzon syndromes are well known craniostenosis. In the last 10 years several studies were performed to provide a better understanding of the etiology and pathogenesis of these diseases. Both have an autosomal dominant mode of transmission, and a mutation in the gene encoding for the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) is the cause in most patients. However, the fact that the same mutation can produce a wide range of phenotypic expression makes the mechanism of anomalous development more complex. The extracellular matrix (ECM) is composed of proteins, glycosaminoglycans, and cytokines that are secreted in an autocrine and paracrine manner and are able to modify the ECM. Fibroblast growth factors are complexed with heparan sulfate, a component of the ECM, before binding the FGFR2. Data exist about different expressions of cytokines and ECM macromolecule in craniostenosis-derived fibroblasts and osteoblasts. Changes in ECM composition could explain the altered osteogenic process and account for pathologic variations in cranial development in addition to the FGFR2 mutations.

1 June 2001 in Journal of Periodontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lorella MarinucciLorella Marinucci
Lorella Marinucci
CLCinzia Lilli
Cinzia Lilli
TBTiziano Baroni
Tiziano Baroni
EBEnnio Becchetti
Ennio Becchetti
SBSalvatore Belcastro
Salvatore Belcastro
PLPaola Locci
Paola Locci
Background: Barrier membranes are used to prevent downgrowth of the oral mucosa along the root surface and to allow alveolar bone regeneration in guided tissue regeneration. Several studies have demonstrated bone regenerates in the presence of bioabsorbable and non‐resorbable membranes, but no studies have compared multiple bioabsorbable barriers to one another and to non‐resorbable barriers. This study evaluated the in vitro influence of bioabsorbable and non‐resorbable membranes on specific parameters of human osteoblast activity.Methods: Human osteoblasts were cultured on bioabsorbable membranes made of collagen, hyaluronic acid, and poly DL‐lactide, and the most common non‐resorbable membrane which is made of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE). The osteoblasts were cultured in vitro for 24 hours on barrier membranes in the presence of 3H‐thymidine and 3H‐proline to study cell proliferation and collagen synthesis. Transforming growth factor‐β1 (TGF‐β1) secretion was evaluated in conditioned media using an ELISA kit.Results: The results showed that collagen and poly DL‐lactide stimulated DNA synthesis more than ePTFE and hyaluronic acid. All bioabsorbable membranes significantly increased collagen synthesis and alkaline phosphatase activity. Collagen and hyaluronic acid increased secretion of TGF‐β1, a growth factor involved in bone remodeling.Conclusions: These data suggest bioabsorbable membranes, particularly collagen and hyaluronic acid, may promote bone regeneration through their activity on osteoblasts. J Periodontol 2001;72:753‐759.

1 November 2018 in Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FMFrancesca Mancuso
Francesca Mancuso
MCMario Calvitti
Mario Calvitti
DMDomenico Milardi
Domenico Milardi
GGGiuseppe Grande
Giuseppe Grande
GFGiulia Falabella
Giulia Falabella
GLGiovanni Luca
Giovanni Luca

1 July 2002 in Molecular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMaria Bodo
Maria Bodo
CLCinzia Lilli
Cinzia Lilli
CBCatia Bellucci
Catia Bellucci
PCPaolo Carinci
Paolo Carinci
MCMario Calvitti
Mario Calvitti
TBTiziano Baroni
Tiziano Baroni
We focused on the phenotype of non-mineralizing MG63 and mineralizing TE85 human osteosarcoma cells and investigated the role of bFGF in modulating their differentiative responses. Basic FGF expression and bFGF effects on osteocalcin, runt-related transcription factor-2 (RUNX2), matrix molecular production and bFGF receptors, were evaluated. Osteocalcin and RUNX2 gene expression were studied by RT-PCR analysis. We evaluated cell proliferation by DNA content and performed differentiation studies on glycosaminoglican (GAG), collagen and proteoglican (PG) synthesis by using radiolabelled precursors and Northern blotting. BFGF receptors were quantified by bFGF receptor binding assay. Osteocalcin is expressed in MG63 and TE65. RUNX2 RNA is differentially spliced in the two cell lines. BFGF elicits the effects of differentially splicing RUNX2. Proliferation, GAG synthesis, bFGF and proteoglycan mRNA expression, high and low affinity bFGF receptors, were more marked in MG63 and differently affected by bFGF. Procollagen expression and alkaline phosphatase activity were significantly reduced. BFGF increased TE85 cell proliferation and reduced TE85 procollagen and osteocalcin production. The different splice variants in RUNX2 gene in the two cell lines might be related to their different phenotypes. The less differentiated stage of MG63 could also be related to bFGF over-production and more bFGF receptors. The consequent increase in bFGF-bFGF receptor binding could explain the bFGF differentiative effects on MG63. We suggest an autocrine role of bFGF endogenous release in controlling the different osteosarcoma phenotypes.