Pablo Iglesias

Prof. Pablo Iglesias


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2002 in Biophysical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAndre Levchenko
Andre Levchenko
PIPablo Iglesias
Pablo Iglesias

4 October 2005 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRobert J Prill
Robert J Prill
PIPablo Iglesias
Pablo Iglesias
ALAndre Levchenko
Andre Levchenko
Biological networks, such as those describing gene regulation, signal transduction, and neural synapses, are representations of large-scale dynamic systems. Discovery of organizing principles of biological networks can be enhanced by embracing the notion that there is a deep interplay between network structure and system dynamics. Recently, many structural characteristics of these non-random networks have been identified, but dynamical implications of the features have not been explored comprehensively. We demonstrate by exhaustive computational analysis that a dynamical property—stability or robustness to small perturbations—is highly correlated with the relative abundance of small subnetworks (network motifs) in several previously determined biological networks. We propose that robust dynamical stability is an influential property that can determine the non-random structure of biological networks.

23 September 2010 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YXYuan Xiong
Yuan Xiong
CHChuan-Hsiang Huang
Chuan-Hsiang Huang
PIPablo Iglesias
Pablo Iglesias
PDPeter N. Devreotes
Peter N. Devreotes
Cells have an internal compass that enables them to move along shallow chemical gradients. As amoeboid cells migrate, signaling events such as Ras and PI3K activation occur spontaneously on pseudopodia. Uniform stimuli trigger a symmetric response, whereupon cells stop and round up; then localized patches of activity appear as cells spread. Finally cells adapt and resume random migration. In contrast, chemotactic gradients continuously direct signaling events to the front of the cell. Local-excitation, global-inhibition (LEGI) and reaction–diffusion models have captured some of these features of chemotaxing cells, but no system has explained the complex response kinetics, sensitivity to shallow gradients, or the role of recently observed propagating waves within the actin cytoskeleton. We report here that Ras and PI3K activation move in phase with the cytoskeleton events and, drawing on all of these observations, propose the LEGI-biased excitable network hypothesis. We formulate a model that simulates most of the behaviors of chemotactic cells: In the absence of stimulation, there are spontaneous spots of activity. Stimulus increments trigger an initial burst of patches followed by localized secondary events. After a few minutes, the system adapts, again displaying random activity. In gradients, the activity patches are directed continuously and selectively toward the chemoattractant, providing an extraordinary degree of amplification. Importantly, by perturbing model parameters, we generate distinct behaviors consistent with known classes of mutants. Our study brings together heretofore diverse observations on spontaneous cytoskeletal activity, signaling responses to temporal stimuli, and spatial gradient sensing into a unified scheme.

18 February 2007 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSaurabh Paliwal
Saurabh Paliwal
PIPablo Iglesias
Pablo Iglesias
KCKyle Campbell
Kyle Campbell
ZHZoe Hilioti
Zoe Hilioti
AGAlex Groisman
Alex Groisman
ALAndre Levchenko
Andre Levchenko

1 February 2008 in Current Opinion in Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PIPablo Iglesias
Pablo Iglesias
PDPeter N Devreotes
Peter N Devreotes

20 October 2013 in Nature Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TLTianzhi Luo
Tianzhi Luo
KMKrithika Mohan
Krithika Mohan
PIPablo Iglesias
Pablo Iglesias
DRDouglas N. Robinson
Douglas N. Robinson
Mechanical forces direct a host of cellular and tissue processes. Although much emphasis has been placed on cell-adhesion complexes as force sensors, the forces must nevertheless be transmitted through the cortical cytoskeleton. Yet how the actin cortex senses and transmits forces and how cytoskeletal proteins interact in response to the forces is poorly understood. Here, by combining molecular and mechanical experimental perturbations with theoretical multiscale modelling, we decipher cortical mechanosensing from molecular to cellular scales. We show that forces are shared between myosin II and different actin crosslinkers, with myosin having potentiating or inhibitory effects on certain crosslinkers. Different types of cell deformation elicit distinct responses, with myosin and α-actinin responding to dilation, and filamin mainly reacting to shear. Our observations show that the accumulation kinetics of each protein may be explained by its molecular mechanisms, and that protein accumulation and the cell’s viscoelastic state can explain cell contraction against mechanical load.