Mahmood S Shivji

Dr. Mahmood S Shivji

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 January 2006 in Conservation Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SCShelley C. Clarke
Shelley C. Clarke
JMJennifer E. Magnussen
Jennifer E. Magnussen
DADebra L. Abercrombie
Debra L. Abercrombie
MMMurdoch K. Mcallister
Murdoch K. Mcallister
MSMahmood S Shivji
Mahmood S Shivji

9 June 2015 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJames S. E. Lea
James S. E. Lea
BWBradley M. Wetherbee
Bradley M. Wetherbee
NQNuno Queiroz
Nuno Queiroz
NBNeil Burnie
Neil Burnie
CAChoy Aming
Choy Aming
MSMahmood S Shivji
Mahmood S Shivji
Long-distance movements of animals are an important driver of population spatial dynamics and determine the extent of overlap with area-focused human activities, such as fishing. Despite global concerns of declining shark populations, a major limitation in assessments of population trends or spatial management options is the lack of information on their long-term migratory behaviour. For a large marine predator, the tiger sharkGaleocerdo cuvier, we show from individuals satellite-tracked for multiple years (up to 1101 days) that adult males undertake annually repeated, round-trip migrations of over 7,500 km in the northwest Atlantic. Notably, these migrations occurred between the highly disparate ecosystems of Caribbean coral reef regions in winter and high latitude oceanic areas in summer, with strong, repeated philopatry to specific overwintering insular habitat. Partial migration also occurred, with smaller, immature individuals displaying reduced migration propensity. Foraging may be a putative motivation for these oceanic migrations, with summer behaviour showing higher path tortuosity at the oceanic range extremes. The predictable migratory patterns and use of highly divergent ecosystems shown by male tiger sharks appear broadly similar to migrations seen in birds, reptiles and mammals and highlight opportunities for dynamic spatial management and conservation measures of highly mobile sharks.

2 August 2002 in Conservation Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMahmood S Shivji
Mahmood S Shivji
SCShelley Clarke
Shelley Clarke
MPMelissa Pank
Melissa Pank
LNLisa Natanson
Lisa Natanson
NKNancy Kohler
Nancy Kohler
MSMichael Stanhope
Michael Stanhope

19 February 2019 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NMNicholas J. Marra
Nicholas J. Marra
MSMichael J. Stanhope
Michael J. Stanhope
NJNathaniel K. Jue
Nathaniel K. Jue
MWMinghui Wang
Minghui Wang
QSQi Sun
Qi Sun
MSMahmood S Shivji
Mahmood S Shivji
The white shark ( Carcharodon carcharias ; Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) is one of the most publicly recognized marine animals. Here we report the genome sequence of the white shark and comparative evolutionary genomic analyses to the chondrichthyans, whale shark (Elasmobranchii) and elephant shark (Holocephali), as well as various vertebrates. The 4.63-Gbp white shark genome contains 24,520 predicted genes, and has a repeat content of 58.5%. We provide evidence for a history of positive selection and gene-content enrichments regarding important genome stability-related genes and functional categories, particularly so for the two elasmobranchs. We hypothesize that the molecular adaptive emphasis on genome stability in white and whale sharks may reflect the combined selective pressure of large genome sizes, high repeat content, high long-interspersed element retrotransposon representation, large body size, and long lifespans, represented across these two species. Molecular adaptation for wound healing was also evident, with positive selection in key genes involved in the wound-healing process, as well as Gene Ontology enrichments in fundamental wound-healing pathways. Sharks, particularly apex predators such as the white shark, are believed to have an acute sense of smell. However, we found very few olfactory receptor genes, very few trace amine-associated receptors, and extremely low numbers of G protein-coupled receptors. We did however, identify 13 copies of vomeronasal type 2 (V2R) genes in white shark and 10 in whale shark; this, combined with the over 30 V2Rs reported previously for elephant shark, suggests this gene family may underlie the keen odorant reception of chondrichthyans.

1 September 2005 in Conservation Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DADebra L. Abercrombie
Debra L. Abercrombie
SCShelley C. Clarke
Shelley C. Clarke
MSMahmood S Shivji
Mahmood S Shivji

18 March 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMark J. Corcoran
Mark J. Corcoran
BWBradley M. Wetherbee
Bradley M. Wetherbee
MSMahmood S Shivji
Mahmood S Shivji
MPMatthew D. Potenski
Matthew D. Potenski
DCDemian D. Chapman
Demian D. Chapman
GHGuy M. Harvey
Guy M. Harvey
Southern stingrays, Dasyatis americana, have been provided supplemental food in ecotourism operations at Stingray City Sandbar (SCS), Grand Cayman since 1986, with this site becoming one of the world’s most famous and heavily visited marine wildlife interaction venues. Given expansion of marine wildlife interactive tourism worldwide, there are questions about the effects of such activities on the focal species and their ecosystems. We used a combination of acoustic telemetry and tag-recapture efforts to test the hypothesis that human-sourced supplemental feeding has altered stingray activity patterns and habitat use at SCS relative to wild animals at control sites. Secondarily, we also qualitatively estimated the population size of stingrays supporting this major ecotourism venue. Tag-recapture data indicated that a population of at least 164 stingrays, over 80% female, utilized the small area at SCS for prolonged periods of time. Examination of comparative movements of mature female stingrays at SCS and control sites revealed strong differences between the two groups: The fed animals demonstrated a notable inversion of diel activity, being constantly active during the day with little movement at night compared to the nocturnally active wild stingrays; The fed stingrays utilized significantly (p<0.05) smaller 24 hour activity spaces compared to wild conspecifics, staying in close proximity to the ecotourism site; Fed stingrays showed a high degree of overlap in their core activity spaces compared to wild stingrays which were largely solitary in the spaces utilized (72% vs. 3% overlap respectively). Supplemental feeding has strikingly altered movement behavior and spatial distribution of the stingrays, and generated an atypically high density of animals at SCS which could have downstream fitness costs for individuals and potentially broader ecosystem effects. These findings should help environmental managers plan mitigating measures for existing operations, and develop precautionary policies regarding proposed feeding sites.