Huapyong Kang

Dr. Huapyong Kang

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 June 2015 in Gut
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BJB Jais
B Jais
VRV Rebours
V Rebours
GMGiuseppe Malleo
Giuseppe Malleo
RSRoberto Salvia
Roberto Salvia
MFM Fontana
M Fontana
PLP Lévy
P Lévy
Objectives Serous cystic neoplasm (SCN) is a cystic neoplasm of the pancreas whose natural history is poorly known. The purpose of the study was to attempt to describe the natural history of SCN, including the specific mortality. Design Retrospective multinational study including SCN diagnosed between 1990 and 2014. Results 2622 patients were included. Seventy-four per cent were women, and median age at diagnosis was 58 years (16–99). Patients presented with non-specific abdominal pain (27%), pancreaticobiliary symptoms (9%), diabetes mellitus (5%), other symptoms (4%) and/or were asymptomatic (61%). Fifty-two per cent of patients were operated on during the first year after diagnosis (median size: 40 mm (2–200)), 9% had resection beyond 1 year of follow-up (3 years (1–20), size at diagnosis: 25 mm (4–140)) and 39% had no surgery (3.6 years (1–23), 25.5 mm (1–200)). Surgical indications were (not exclusive) uncertain diagnosis (60%), symptoms (23%), size increase (12%), large size (6%) and adjacent organ compression (5%). In patients followed beyond 1 year (n=1271), size increased in 37% (growth rate: 4 mm/year), was stable in 57% and decreased in 6%. Three serous cystadenocarcinomas were recorded. Postoperative mortality was 0.6% (n=10), and SCN's related mortality was 0.1% (n=1). Conclusions After a 3-year follow-up, clinical relevant symptoms occurred in a very small proportion of patients and size slowly increased in less than half. Surgical treatment should be proposed only for diagnosis remaining uncertain after complete workup, significant and related symptoms or exceptionally when exists concern with malignancy. This study supports an initial conservative management in the majority of patients with SCN. Trial registration number IRB 00006477.

15 February 2020 in World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ICIn Rae Cho
In Rae Cho
HKHuapyong Kang
Huapyong Kang
JJJung Hyun Jo
Jung Hyun Jo
HLHee Seung Lee
Hee Seung Lee
MCMoon Jae Chung
Moon Jae Chung
SBSeungmin Bang
Seungmin Bang
FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer: Single-center cohort study

20 November 2021 in Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HKHuapyong Kang
Huapyong Kang
SHSung Yong Han
Sung Yong Han
JCJae Hee Cho
Jae Hee Cho
EKEui Joo Kim
Eui Joo Kim
DKDong Uk Kim
Dong Uk Kim
TLTae Hoon Lee
Tae Hoon Lee

15 November 2018 in World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HKHuapyong Kang
Huapyong Kang
JJJung Hyun Jo
Jung Hyun Jo
HLHee Seung Lee
Hee Seung Lee
MCMoon Jae Chung
Moon Jae Chung
SBSeungmin Bang
Seungmin Bang
JPJeong Youp Park
Jeong Youp Park
To directly compare the efficacy and toxicity of standard-dose FOLFIRINOX (sFOLFIRINOX) and modified-dose FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX, 75% of standard-dose) for pancreatic cancer. One hundred and thirty pancreatic cancer patients who received sFOLFIRINOX (n = 88) or mFOLFIRINOX (n = 42) as their first-line chemotherapy from January 2013 to July 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. For efficacy analysis, the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated and compared using Pearson's chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank test. The adverse events (AEs) were evaluated, and severe (≥ grade 3) AEs rates of the two groups were compared for toxicity analysis. The mFOLFIRINOX group included more female patients (30.7% vs 57.1%; P = 0.004) and older patients [age (median), 57 vs 63.5; P = 0.018] than the sFOLFIRINOX group. In the efficacy analysis, the ORR and DCR were not significantly different between the two groups (ORR: 39.8% vs 35.7%; P = 0.656; DCR: 80.7% vs 83.3%; P = 0.716). The median PFS and OS were also not different between the groups (PFS: 8.7 mo vs 8.1 mo, P = 0.272; OS: 13.9 mo vs 13.7 mo, P = 0.476). In the safety analysis with severe AEs, the rates of neutropenia (83.0% vs 66.7%; P = 0.044), anorexia (48.9% vs 28.6%; P = 0.029) and diarrhea (13.6% vs 0.0%; P = 0.009) were markedly lower in the mFOLFIRINOX group. mFOLFIRINOX showed comparable efficacy but better safety compared to sFOLFIRINOX. If clinically necessary, initiating FOLFIRINOX with 75% of the standard-dose can alleviate toxicity concerns without compromising efficacy.

12 June 2013 in Journal of Viral Hepatitis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CNC. Y. Nie
C. Y. Nie
THTao Han
Tao Han
LZL. Zhang
L. Zhang
YLYing Li
Ying Li
HLH. Liu
H. Liu
SLS. Y. Liu
S. Y. Liu

15 December 2018 in World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MCMoon Jae Chung
Moon Jae Chung
HKHuapyong Kang
Huapyong Kang
HKHo Gak Kim
Ho Gak Kim
JHJong Jin Hyun
Jong Jin Hyun
JLJun Kyu Lee
Jun Kyu Lee
SBSeungmin Bang
Seungmin Bang
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified FOLFIRINOX as a second-line treatment for gemcitabine (GEM)-refractory unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). This study was a prospective, multicenter, one-arm, open-label, phase II trial. Patients with unresectable PC, who showed disease progression during GEM-based chemotherapy were enrolled. All patients were administered FOLFIRINOX with reduced irinotecan and oxaliplatin (RIO; irinotecan 120 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2), which was set according to the phase I study of FOLFIRINOX. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events were evaluated. Additionally, changes in quality of life (QoL) were assessed using a questionnaire on QoL. Between August 2015 and May 2016, a total of 48 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 259 d with a median of 8.5 cycles. The ORR and DCR were 18.8% and 62.5%, respectively, including one patient who showed complete remission. The median PFS was 5.8 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7-7.9] and median OS was 9.0 mo (95%CI: 6.4-11.6). Neutropenia (64.6%) was the most common grade 3-4 adverse event, followed by febrile neutropenia (16.7%). Although 14.6% of patients experienced grade 3 fatigue, most non-hematologic AEs were under grade 2. In the QoL analysis, the global health status score before treatment was not different from the score at the last visit after treatment (45.43 ± 22.88 vs 48.66 ± 24.14, P = 0.548). FOLFIRINOX with RIO showed acceptable toxicity and promising efficacy for GEM-refractory unresectable PC. However, this treatment requires careful observation of treatment-related hematologic toxicities.