A second-line standard of treatment has not yet been identified in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS), so identifying predictive markers could be a valuable tool. Recent studies have shown that the intratumoral and inflammatory systems significantly influence tumor aggressiveness. We aimed to investigate prognostic values of pre-therapy neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic inflammatory index (SII), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of STS patients receiving second-line treatment. In this single-center retrospective analysis, ninety-nine patients with STS were enrolled. All patients received second-line treatment after progressing to anthracycline. PFS and OS curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method of RNA sequencing, and CIBERSORT analysis was performed on six surgical specimens of liposarcoma patients. A high NLR, PLR, and SII were significantly associated with worse PFS (p = 0.019; p = 0.004; p = 0.006). Low LMR was significantly associated with worse OS (p = 0.006). Patients treated with Trabectedin showed a better PFS when the LMR was low, while patients treated with other regimens showed a worse PFS when the LMR was low (p = 0.0154). The intratumoral immune infiltrates analysis seems to show a correlation between intratumoral macrophages and LMR. PS ECOG. The metastatic onset and tumor burden showed prognostic significance for PFS (p = 0.004; p = 0.041; p = 0.0086). According to the histologies, PFS was: 5.7 mo in liposarcoma patients vs. 3.8 mo in leiomyosarcoma patients vs. 3.1 months in patients with other histologies (p = 0.053). Our results confirm the prognostic role of systemic inflammatory markers in patients with STS. Moreover, we demonstrated that LMR is a specific predictor of Trabectedin efficacy and could be useful in daily clinical practice. We also highlighted a possible correlation between LMR levels and the percentage of intratumoral macrophages.

Adult rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) represents an uncommon entity with an incidence of less than 3% of all soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Consequently, the natural history and the clinical management of this disease are infrequently reported. In order to fill this gap, we investigated the molecular biology of an adult RMS case series. The expression of epithelial mesenchymal transition-related gene and chemoresistance-related gene panels were evaluated. Moreover, taking advantage of our STS translational model combining patient-derived primary culture and 3D-scaffold, the pharmacological profile of an adult head and neck sclerosing RMS was assessed. Furthermore, NGS, microsatellite instability, and in silico analyses were carried out. RT-PCR identified the upregulation of CDH1, SLUG, MMP9, RAB22a, S100P, and LAPTM4b, representing promising biomarkers for this disease. Pharmacological profiling showed the highest sensitivity with anthracycline-based regimen in both 2D and 3D culture systems. NGS analysis detected RAB3IP-HMGA2 in frame gene rearrangement and FGFR4 mutation; microsatellite instability analysis did not detect any alteration. In silico analysis confirmed the mutation of FGFR4 as a promising marker for poor prognosis and a potential therapeutic target. We report for the first time the molecular and pharmacological characterization of rare entities of adult head and neck and posterior trunk RMS. These preliminary data could shed light on this poorly understood disease.

Head and neck cancers (HNCs) represent the sixth most widespread malignancy worldwide. Surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic drugs represent the main clinical approaches for HNC patients. Moreover, HNCs are characterised by an elevated mutational load; however, specific genetic mutations or biomarkers have not yet been found. In this scenario, personalised medicine is showing its efficacy. To study the reliability and the effects of personalised treatments, preclinical research can take advantage of next-generation sequencing and innovative technologies that have been developed to obtain genomic and multi-omic profiles to drive personalised treatments. The crosstalk between malignant and healthy components, as well as interactions with extracellular matrices, are important features which are responsible for treatment failure. Preclinical research has constantly implemented in vitro and in vivo models to mimic the natural tumour microenvironment. Among them, 3D systems have been developed to reproduce the tumour mass architecture, such as biomimetic scaffolds and organoids. In addition, in vivo models have been changed over the last decades to overcome problems such as animal management complexity and time-consuming experiments. In this review, we will explore the new approaches aimed to improve preclinical tools to study and apply precision medicine as a therapeutic option for patients affected by HNCs.

Background: We assessed the real-life clinical impact of bone health management in patients with breast cancer (BC) receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy at an Italian Osteoncology Center. Methods: Pre- and post-menopausal women undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy for early-stage BC who came to our institute for their first bone health evaluation from January 2011 to June 2016 were considered in this retrospective observational study. Results: 1125 pre- and post-menopausal early-stage BC patients (209 and 916, respectively) were evaluated. Median age was 61 years (range 26–88). In the pre-menopausal group, spinal x-ray revealed that 10 patients (4.7%) had a morphometric vertebral fracture. Higher age (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.01–1.29) and bone mineral density (BMD) ≤ −2.5 (OR: 14.45; 95% CI: 1.70–122.67) were associated with a higher risk of bone fracture. The overall frequency of bone fracture was 17.6% (n = 161) in post-menopausal patients and a lower risk for bone fractures was associated with tamoxifen or other treatments (OR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.12–0.53), presence of back pain (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.16–2.36), lower BMD (OR: 2.09 in patients with T-score ≤ 2.5; 95% CI: 1.21–3.59) and lower vitamin D levels (OR: 1.57 in patients with ≤ 10 ng/mL; 95% CI: 1.05–2.34) in univariate analysis. Conclusion: Our findings confirm that bone health management should be an integral part of long-term cancer care.

Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is a poor prognosis malignant grade 4 glioma. After surgical resection, standard therapy consists of concurrent radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) followed by TMZ alone. The DC vaccination increased the amount of intratumoral-activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes and decreased the number of FoxP3-positive regulatory T cells. Based on these da-ta, we have developed a phase II protocol with the DC vaccine concomitant to standard RT-CT in patients undergoing surgery for GBM. Methods This is a single-arm, monocentric, phase II trial evaluating progression-free survival (PFS) and the safety of a DC vaccination integrated with standard therapy in resected GBM patients. The vaccine administration begins at the end of the RT-CT (Induction Phase) and is subsequently al-ternated with TMZ cycles (Maintenance Phase). The primary endpoints are PFS and safety. Among the secondary endpoints, are the in vitro and in vivo Immune response evaluations. Results By December 2022 , nine patients had been enrolled in the first step. Two patients progressed within three months after leukapheresis and none had experienced DC vaccine-related G3-4 tox-icity. Five patients had a positive DTH test against KLH. By June 2023. The median OS from leu-kapheresis was 23.1 months and 24.7 from surgery. Conclusions This combination therapy is well-tolerated, and we have achieved the two endpoints required for the first step. Therefore, the study will proceed to enroll the remaining 19 patients.

Background/Objectives: Management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) is essential for preserving quality of life among breast cancer (BC) patients receiving endocrine therapy. However, bone-modifying agents (BMAs) remain underused and delayed. In 2014, IRST launched the first bone health outpatient service in Romagna (the eastern area of the Emilia-Romagna region). A multi-centre, retrospective observational study with propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to evaluate the impact of the IRST organisational model on bone health. Methods: The PSM matched the Emilia-Romagna patients who underwent BC surgery between 2014 and 2022 and were in follow-up in the Romagna area. Patients were grouped as follows: (1) IRST and (2) other Romagna hospitals (without bone health service, i.e., the control group). The matching was based on age, in situ/invasive cancer, and type of early-stage treatment (hormone treatment vs. chemotherapy). Logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazard models assessed factors associated with bone care treatment initiation and timings, respectively. Results: After PSM, we matched 3112 of the 8021 eligible patients into the two cohorts. IRST patients were 39% more likely to receive BMAs (OR: 1.393; 95% CI: 1.236–1.571) and initiated treatment approximately 12 months earlier. We observed that patients with invasive tumours were 77% more likely to initiate bone therapy than those with in situ tumours (OR: 1.766; 95% CI: 1.237–2.585). The early initiation of bone health therapy was influenced by age (p < 0.001) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The IRST model demonstrates responsiveness to bone health needs in BC patients and may be implemented elsewhere to support integrated CTIBL care.