Daptomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (DRE) poses an increasing therapeutic challenge, particularly in immunocompromised patients and solid organ transplant recipients. Surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicate that approximately 6.5% of E. faecium isolates are daptomycin-resistant, underscoring the need for heightened clinical vigilance, particularly for prompt identification and treatment. In this case series, three patients with advanced liver disease, including two status post orthotopic liver transplantation, are described who developed DRE during treatment for bloodstream infection. These cases illustrate the dynamic nature of antimicrobial susceptibility under daptomycin exposure and highlight the contributions of persistent source control issues, intravascular infection, and altered host factors to treatment failure. All patients were successfully managed by escalating to combination therapy with high-dose daptomycin and ceftaroline, alongside appropriate source control. This series emphasizes the importance of periodic susceptibility reassessment during daptomycin therapy and cautions clinicians against assuming sustained susceptibility in patients with prolonged bacteremia or complex infections. Early recognition of evolving resistance and timely therapeutic adjustment may improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

This case report presents a patient with exogenous endophthalmitis caused by Fusarium falciformis, highlighting the risks associated with immunosuppressive therapy using Adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis. The patient's compromised immune system, likely exacerbated by gardening exposure, facilitated the fungal infection, marking the first documented instance of Fusarium-related endophthalmitis linked to Adalimumab. Fusarium species are prevalent in the environment but are infrequently recognized as pathogens in humans, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. The differentiation between infectious and non-infectious ocular inflammation poses a significant challenge for clinicians. In this case, early involvement of ophthalmology was critical, leading to effective treatment strategies. Notably, in vitro testing revealed unexpected sensitivity of the isolated Fusarium strain to amphotericin B, which, combined with posaconazole, proved beneficial when combined with intravitreal injections of amphotericin B. This underscores the importance of tailored therapeutic approaches for rare ocular fungal infections and the necessity for increased awareness among healthcare providers regarding potential ocular adverse effects of biologic therapies. Ultimately, this case serves as a vital reminder of the complexities in managing ocular infections in patients receiving immunomodulatory treatments, advocating for vigilant assessment and prompt intervention to preserve vision.

Candida krusei empyema is a rare but serious manifestation of invasive candidiasis, characterized by intrinsic resistance to fluconazole, biofilm formation, and high mortality, with limited case-level data to inform management. This review aims to systematically identify and synthesize all reported English-language cases of Candida krusei empyema from January 2005 to June 2025 using PubMed, ScienceDirect, OVID MEDLINE, and Gale OneFile and perform descriptive analysis on them. Screening, data extraction, and eligibility assessment were performed, and those articles not clearly meeting eligibility criteria were reviewed by additional reviewers with consensus resolution. Seven publications (six individual cases and two cohorts) were included. We additionally describe the clinical course, management, and outcome of a 70-year-old bilateral lung transplant patient who developed persistent C. krusei empyema despite optimized antifungal therapy. Patients ranged from 11 to 74 years of age (median 62.5 years). Predisposing factors included esophageal perforation (n = 4), post-transplant hemorrhage (n = 1), community-acquired empyema (n = 1), and thoracic surgery (n = 1). Empiric fluconazole was switched to caspofungin (3/4), with others receiving amphotericin B, voriconazole, or combination therapy. Source control varied: chest tube drainage (n = 3), percutaneous catheter (n = 3), and surgical decortication (n = 2). Mortality was 14.3% (1/7). In the absence of clear guidelines and robust literature, the management approach remains heterogeneous. Optimal care requires early recognition, aggressive multimodal antifungal therapy, and effective source control tailored to patient risk. Standardized antifungal protocols and larger case series are needed to guide clinicians in managing this challenging infection.