Objectives: To compare the feasibility and reliability of manual versus software-assisted assessments of computed tomography scans according to iRECIST in patients undergoing immune-based cancer treatment. Methods: Computed tomography scans of 30 tumor patients undergoing cancer treatment were evaluated by four independent radiologists at baseline (BL) and two follow-ups (FU), resulting in a total of 360 tumor assessments (120 each at BL/FU1/FU2). After image interpretation, tumor burden and response status were either calculated manually or semi-automatically as defined by software, respectively. The reading time, calculated sum of longest diameter (SLD), and tumor response (e.g., “iStable Disease”) were determined for each assessment. After complete data collection, a consensus reading among the four readers was performed to establish a reference standard for the correct response assignments. The reading times, error rates, and inter-reader agreement on SLDs were statistically compared between the manual versus software-assisted approaches. Results: The reading time was significantly longer for the manual versus software-assisted assessments at both follow-ups (median [interquartile range] FU1: 4.00 min [2.17 min] vs. 2.50 min [1.00 min]; FU2: 3.75 min [1.88 min] vs. 2.00 min [1.50 min]; both p < 0.001). Regarding reliability, 2.5% of all the response assessments were incorrect at FU1 (3.3% manual; 0% software-assisted), which increased to 5.8% at FU2 (10% manual; 1.7% software-assisted), demonstrating higher error rates for manual readings. Quantitative SLD inter-reader agreement was inferior for the manual compared to the software-assisted assessments at both FUs (FU1: ICC = 0.91 vs. 0.93; FU2: ICC = 0.75 vs. 0.86). Conclusions: Software-assisted assessments may facilitate the iRECIST response evaluation of cancer patients in clinical routine by decreasing the reading time and reducing response misclassifications.

Background Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men and the second most common tumor-associated cause of death in the male population in Germany. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted hybrid imaging using positron emission tomography (PET) in combination with CT or MRI represents a comparably new method that gained increasing importance in the diagnostic process of PCa in recent years. Method Current applications of PSMA hybrid imaging were summarized according to the German and European guidelines on PCa. New developments were elaborated based on a literature review of PubMed conducted in 10/22. Results PSMA-PET/CT demonstrated higher detection rates for metastases in high-risk PCa and recurrent PCa after primary therapy than established imaging methods (CT, MRI, and bone scan). Despite promising results from prospective trials in both scenarios and substantial influence on clinical decision making, data regarding the influence of PSMA-PET on PCa-specific and overall survival are still lacking. Hence, PSMA PET/CT is recommended with a “weak” strength rating in most situations. However, its importance in new treatment options like metastasis-directed therapy or PSMA-radioligand therapy expands the scope of PSMA-PET in the clinical routine. Conclusion PSMA-targeting hybrid imaging represents the most sensitive diagnostic test in several stages of PCa and allows the development of new treatment strategies. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the influence of PSMA-PET on patient survival. Key Points Citation Format