Postoperative pain is the unpleasant sensory and emotional experience after surgery, its origin being both the inflammatory reaction induced by the surgical trauma on the abdominal wall and the splanchnic pain induced by the activation of nociceptors of the viscera, which are highly sensitive to distension, ischemia, and inflammation. Nowadays, it is well recognized that there is a close relationship between the gut microbiome and pain perception, and that microbiome is highly affected by both anesthesia and surgical manipulation. Thus, efforts to restore the disturbed microbiome via supplementation with beneficial bacteria, namely probiotics, seem to be effective. In this article, the knowledge gained mainly from experimental research on this topic is analyzed, the concluding message being that each probiotic strain works in its own way towards pain relief.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, different SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) with specific characteristics have emerged and spread worldwide. At the same time, clinicians routinely evaluate the results of certain blood tests upon patient admission as well as during hospitalization to assess disease severity and the overall patient status. In the present study, we searched for significant cell blood count and biomarker differences among patients affected with the Alpha, Delta and Omicron VOCs at admission. Data from 330 patients were retrieved regarding age, gender, VOC, cell blood count results (WBC, Neut%, Lymph%, Ig%, PLT), common biomarkers (D-dimers, urea, creatinine, SGOT, SGPT, CRP, IL-6, suPAR), ICU admission and death. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA, the Kruskal–Wallis test, two-way ANOVA, Chi-square, T-test, the Mann–Whitney test and logistic regression was performed where appropriate using SPSS v.28 and STATA 14. Age and VOC were significantly associated with hospitalization, whereas significant differences among VOC groups were found for WBC, PLT, Neut%, IL-6, creatinine, CRP, D-dimers and suPAR. Our analyses showed that throughout the current pandemic, not only the SARS-CoV-2 VOCs but also the laboratory parameters that are used to evaluate the patient’s status at admission are subject to changes.

Healthcare systems suffered a significant hit by the COVID-19 pandemic since the spring of 2020, and a need for major reorganization emerged. Along with the constant increase in COVID-19 cases, a significant drop in emergency attendances for non-COVID-19-related conditions was noted worldwide. We decided to document attendances in our hospital's emergency department during the first lockdown period in order to monitor this trend, compare it to data from other countries, and start monitoring the effects of this reduction in the years to come. Emergency department attendances at AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece, from March 10, 2020, to May 31, 2020, were documented and compared to the corresponding period in 2019. The data collected included the number of patients per specialty, severity upon admission, as well as the need for admission. We found a 58% reduction in emergency department attendance during the studied period compared to the corresponding period in 2019 (p<0.0001). The reduction was more noticeable in ears, nose, throat (ENT), and ophthalmology attendances (75.7% and 78.1% reductions, respectively, p<0.001), but other specialties, such as cardiology and general surgery, were also significantly affected (60% and 63% reductions, respectively, p<0.001). However, the percentage of attendances that required admission increased significantly by 25-33% (p<0.001) during the lockdown, reflecting the higher severity of cases reaching the hospital. Despite the obvious reduction in attendances during the COVID-19 pandemic, patients still suffer from serious conditions that require hospital admission. Therefore, hospitals need to be supported to also care for these patients. The long-term effects of avoiding hospital attendance need to be closely monitored.

Post-operative pain is the unpleasant sensory and emotional experience after surgery, its origin being both the inflammatory reaction induced by the surgical trauma on the abdominal wall, and the splanchnic pain, induced by the activation of nociceptors of the viscera, which are highly sensi-tive to distension, ischemia and inflammation. Nowadays, it is well recognized that there is a close relationship between the gut microbiome and pain perception, and that microbiome is highly af-fected by both anaesthesia and surgical manipulation. Thus, efforts to restore the disturbed micro-biome by supplementation with beneficial bacteria, namely probiotics, seems to be effective. In this article the knowledge gained mainly from experimental research on this topic is analyzed, the con-cluding message being that each probiotic strain works in its own way towards pain relief.

Background: Cardiac arrest is a time-critical medical emergency during which prompt and effective drug delivery plays a key role in patient outcomes. Current resuscitation guidelines recommend intravenous (IV) access as the first-line route, with intraosseous (IO) access recommended as an alternative when IV access is delayed or not feasible. Although the endotracheal (ET) route was previously included in resuscitation protocols, it is no longer recommended. This study aims to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of resuscitation drugs administered through different injection sites and under varying hemodynamic conditions in in vivo animal models. Methods: PubMed, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to August 2025 for studies comparing different injection sites for the same drug (adrenaline/epinephrine, amiodarone, lidocaine and vasopressin) during CPR. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessments were performed independently by two reviewers. Frequentist random-effects models were used to calculate mean differences and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Fourteen prospective experimental studies (sample sizes ranging from 15 to 49 animals) conducted on swine were included. For epinephrine under normovolemia, humeral IO (HIO) access achieved significantly higher maximum concentrations (C_max; p = 0.0238) and a shorter time to the maximum concentration (T_max; p < 0.01) compared to IV, translating into faster return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (p = 0.0681). Under hypovolemia, IV access proved superiority over IO for epinephrine administration (MD = +382.80 ng/mL; p = 0.0022). The time to ROSC was significantly shorter with sternal IO (SIO) compared to tibial IO (TIO) (p = 0.0109). For amiodarone and vasopressin, no consistent or statistically significant differences were observed between administration routes, and in several cases, the findings were based on a single study. Conclusions: The injection site significantly influences the PK and PD of epinephrine during cardiac arrest. Proximal IO routes may offer advantages under normovolemic conditions, while IV access appears superior in cases of hypovolemic shock. Further research is needed to guide optimal drug delivery in varying hemodynamic conditions during cardiac arrest.

Urinary bladder catheterization in swine can be technically challenging, particularly when experimental preparation also requires femoral vascular access. We illustrate a preperitoneal approach combining femoral vessel catheterization and cystostomy through a single inguinal incision. The technique was used in 20 three-month-old Landrace pigs (10 male and 10 female; 25–30 kg) during an approved acute, non-recovery experimental protocol. After femoral venous and arterial catheterization, the bladder was identified and exposed without formal mobilization. An 18 Fr Foley catheter was inserted through a small cystotomy and secured with a purse-string suture. Catheterization succeeded in all animals, with no observed intraoperative complications or urinary leakage; catheters remained patent. These observations demonstrate the technical feasibility of combined femoral vascular and urinary bladder access through a single inguinal incision in 20 pigs during an acute, non-recovery experiment; they do not establish comparative advantage or procedural safety.