Limin Wang

Dr. Limin Wang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 February 2022 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MZMei Zhang
Mei Zhang
XZXiaoxia Zhu
Xiaoxia Zhu
JWJing Wu
Jing Wu
ZHZhengjing Huang
Zhengjing Huang
ZZZhenping Zhao
Zhenping Zhao
LWLimin Wang
Limin Wang
Objective: To determine the nationwide prevalence of hyperuricemia in China and evaluate its trends and associated risk factors. Methods: Using a multi-stage, stratified, cluster-randomized sampling design, two cross-sectional surveys (representative of national and provincial information) were conducted in 31 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) in mainland China, with 166, 861 Chinese adults in 2015–16 and 168, 351 in 2018–19. Serum uric acid (SUA) levels of all participants were measured after a >10-hour overnight fast. Hyperuricemia (HUA) was defined when SUA was >420 μmol/L. Prevalence estimates were weighted to represent the total population considering the complex sampling design. Multivariable logistic regression models was used to estimate factors associated with HUA. Results: The overall hyperuricemia prevalence in the Chinese adult population was 11.1% (95% confidence interval 10.3% to 11.8%) in 2015–16 and 14.0% (13.1% to 14.8%) in 2018–19; an alarming rise was observed in the three years. Hyperuricemia was more common in men with 19.3% (17.9% to 20.7%) in 2015–16 and 24.4% (23.0% to 25.8%) in 2018–19, although the prevalence also escalated from 2.8% (2.5% to 3.0%) in 2015–16 to 3.6% (3.2% to 4.0%) in 2018–19 in women. The hyperuricemia risk factors include the urban culture, settlement in the East, Zhuang descent, high education, heavy or frequent beer drinking, high red meat intake, physical inactivity, high body mass index, central obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and low glomerular filtration rate. Conclusion: The estimated hyperuricemia prevalence among Chinese adults was 14.0% in 2018-19; significant escalating trends were observed between 2015-16 and 2018-19.

11 January 2023 in BMJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MZMei Zhang
Mei Zhang
YSYu Shi
Yu Shi
BZBin Zhou
Bin Zhou
ZHZhengjing Huang
Zhengjing Huang
ZZZhenping Zhao
Zhenping Zhao
LCli yi chong
li yi chong
Objective: To assess the recent trends in prevalence and management of hypertension in China, nationally and by population subgroups. Design: Six rounds of a national survey, China. Setting: China Chronic Disease and Risk Factors Surveillance, 2004-18. Participants: 642 523 community dwelling adults aged 18-69 years (30 501 in 2004, 47 353 in 2007, 90 491 in 2010, 156 836 in 2013, 162 293 in 2015, and 155 049 in 2018). Main outcome measures: Hypertension was defined as a blood pressure of ≥140/90 mm Hg or taking antihypertensive drugs. The main outcome measures were hypertension prevalence and proportion of people with hypertension who were aware of their hypertension, who were treated for hypertension, and whose blood pressure was controlled below 140/90 mm Hg. Results: The standardised prevalence of hypertension in adults aged 18-69 years in China increased from 20.8% (95% confidence interval 19.0% to 22.5%) in 2004 to 29.6% (27.8% to 31.3%) in 2010, then decreased to 24.7% (23.2% to 26.1%) in 2018. During 2010-18, the absolute annual decline in prevalence of hypertension among women was more than twice that among men (−0.83 percentage points (95% confidence interval −1.13 to −0.52) v −0.40 percentage points (−0.73 to −0.07)). Despite modest improvements in the awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension since 2004, rates remained low in 2018, at 38.3% (36.3% to 40.4%), 34.6% (32.6% to 36.7%), and 12.0% (10.6% to 13.4%). Of 274 million (95% confidence interval 238 to 311 million) adults aged 18-69 years with hypertension in 2018, control was inadequate in an estimated 240 million (215 to 264 million). Across all surveys, women with low educational attainment had higher prevalence of hypertension than those with higher education, but the finding was mixed for men. The gap in hypertension control between urban and rural areas persisted, despite larger improvements in diagnosis and control in rural than in urban areas. Conclusions: The prevalence of hypertension in China has slightly declined since 2010, but treatment and control remain low. The findings highlight the need for improving detection and treatment of hypertension through the strengthening of primary care in China, especially in rural areas.

1 June 2018 in International Journal of Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MZMei Zhang
Mei Zhang
QDQian Deng
Qian Deng
LWLinhong Wang
Linhong Wang
ZHZhengjing Huang
Zhengjing Huang
MZMaigeng Zhou
Maigeng Zhou
LWLimin Wang
Limin Wang

25 August 2022 in PLOS Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MZMei Zhang
Mei Zhang
LYLing Yang
Ling Yang
LWLimin Wang
Limin Wang
YJYong Jiang
Yong Jiang
ZHZhengjing Huang
Zhengjing Huang
MZMaigeng Zhou
Maigeng Zhou
Background: Tobacco smoking is a leading cause of premature death in China, especially among adult men. Since the implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in 2005, nationwide tobacco control has been strengthened, but its long-term impact on smoking prevalence is unclear. Methods and findings: Five nationally representative surveys of the China Chronic Disease and Risk Factor Surveillance (CCDRFS) were conducted in 2007, 2010, 2013, 2015, and 2018. A total of 624,568 adults (278,605 men and 345,963 women) aged 18 to 69 years were randomly selected from 31 provinces (or equivalent) in China. Temporal changes in smoking prevalence and patterns (e.g., percentages of those smoking manufactured cigarettes, amount smoked, and age at smoking initiation) were analyzed, overall and by sex, urban or rural residence, year of birth, education and occupation, using linear regression methods. Among men, the standardized prevalence of current smoking decreased from 58.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56.1 to 60.7) to 50.8% (95% CI: 49.1 to 52.5, p < 0.001) between 2007 and 2018, with annual decrease more pronounced in urban (55.7% [95% CI: 51.2 to 60.3] to 46.3% [95% CI: 43.7 to 49.0], p < 0.001) than rural men (59.9% [95% CI: 57.5 to 62.4] to 54.6% [95% CI: 52.6 to 56.6], p = 0.05) and in those born before than after 1980. Among rural men born after 1990, however, the prevalence increased from 40.2% [95% CI: 34.0 to 46.4] to 52.1% ([95% CI: 45.7 to 58.5], p = 0.007), with the increase taking place mainly before 2015. Among women, smoking prevalence remained extremely low at around 2% during 2007 to 2018. No significant changes of current smoking prevalence (53.9% to 50.8%, p = 0.22) were observed in male patients with at least 1 of major chronic diseases (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)). In 2018, 25.6% of adults aged ≥18 years smoked, translating into an estimated 282 million smokers (271 million men and 11 million women) in China. Across 31 provinces, smoking prevalence varied greatly. The 3 provinces (Yunnan, Guizhou, and Hunan) with highest per capita tobacco production had highest smoking prevalence in men (68.0%, 63.4%, and 61.5%, respectively), while lowest prevalence was observed in Shanghai (34.8%). Since the children and teenage groups were not included in the surveys, we could not assess the smoking trends among youths. Furthermore, since the smoking behavior was self-reported, the smoking prevalence could be underestimated due to reporting bias. Conclusions: In this study, we observed that the smoking prevalence has decreased steadily in recent decades in China, but there were diverging trends between urban and rural areas, especially among men born after 1980. Future tobacco control strategies should target rural young men, regions with high tobacco production, and patients suffering from chronic diseases.

18 February 2020 in Annals of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XZXiao Zhang
Xiao Zhang
MZMei Zhang
Mei Zhang
ZZZhenping Zhao
Zhenping Zhao
ZHZhengjing Huang
Zhengjing Huang
QDQian Deng
Qian Deng
LWLimin Wang
Limin Wang

24 March 2018 in Cancer Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HBHeling Bao
Heling Bao
LZLei Zhang
Lei Zhang
LWLimin Wang
Limin Wang
MZMei Zhang
Mei Zhang
ZZZhenping Zhao
Zhenping Zhao
LWLinhong Wang
Linhong Wang
Variations in cervical cancer screening rates in China have rarely been studied in depth. This study aimed to investigate cervical cancer screening rates in relation to both individual‐level and geographical measures of socioeconomic status (SES). Data were obtained from women aged 21 years or older by face‐to‐face interviews between August 2013 and July 2014 as part of the Chinese Chronic Diseases and Risk Factors Surveillance. The geographical variables were obtained from the 2010 Chinese population census. The cervical cancer screening rates and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated and mapped. Multilevel logistic regression models were fitted. Overall, only 21.4% (95% CI: 19.6–23.1%) of 91,816 women aged ≥21 years reported having ever been screened for cervical cancer and significant geographical variations at both province and county levels were identified (P < 0.01). The cervical cancer screening rates were the lowest among the poor [13.9% (95% CI: 12.1–15.7%)], uninsured [14.4% (95% CI: 10.3–18.4%)], less‐educated [16.0% (95% CI: 14.3–17.6%)], and agricultural employment [18.1% (95% CI: 15.8–20.4%)] women along with those residing in areas of low economic status [15.0% (95% CI: 11.8–18.2%)], of low urbanization [15.6% (95% CI: 13.4–17.7%)], and of low education status [16.0% (95% CI: 14.0–18.1%)]. The multilevel analysis also indicated that women with lower individual‐level measures of SES residing in areas with low geographical measures of SES were significantly less likely to receive cervical cancer screening (P < 0.0001). Despite the launch of an organized cancer screening program in China, cervical cancer screening rates remain alarmingly low and significant variations based on geographical regions and measures of SES still exist. It is therefore essential to adopt strategies to better direct limited available public resources to priority groups.