Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a genetically heterogeneous malignancy driven by structural variants (SVs) that impact diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Traditional methods such as karyotyping, FISH, and PCR often fail to detect cryptic or complex rearrangements, which are critical for accurate risk stratification. Methods: Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) is a technology that directly analyzes ultra-high-molecular-weight DNA, enabling the identification of balanced and unbalanced SVs, copy number variations (CNVs), and gene fusions with high resolution. This review compares the advantages and limitations of OGM versus standard techniques in ALL. Results: OGM improves ALL diagnosis by detecting clinically relevant alterations such as IKZF1 deletions, cryptic KMT2A rearrangements, and kinase fusions, especially in cases with normal or uninformative karyotypes. It reduces artifacts by eliminating cell culture and shortens reporting times. OGM resolves complex events like intrachromosomal amplifications and chromothripsis, enhancing classification and therapy decisions. Limitations include reduced sensitivity in repetitive regions, challenges in detecting Robertsonian translocations, difficulties with complex ploidies, and lower sensitivity for low-frequency subclones. Conclusions: Integrating OGM with next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows comprehensive genomic profiling, improving diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized treatment in ALL. Future advancements promise to further enhance the clinical utility of OGM.

Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a highly heterogeneous hematologic malignancy where treatment response and relapse risk do not exclusively rely on the identification of genetic lesions but also on dynamic biological states sustained by specific transcriptional and epigenetic programs. Although the integrated application of multi-omics approaches has significantly expanded our knowledge of oncogenic dependencies, cellular plasticity, and mechanisms of therapeutic resistance, its systematic translation into the clinical practice of adult ALL is yet to become a reality. The aim of this review is to provide a critical and focused synthesis on how the integration of genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenetics enables the interpretation of disease biological behaviors and may guide personalized therapeutic strategies while simultaneously addressing the major limitations that hinder clinical implementation. Genomics allows for the identification of driver events and pharmacologically actionable vulnerabilities, whereas transcriptomics, including single-cell analyses, reveals functional states associated with clonal persistence, glucocorticoid resistance, and therapeutic adaptation, even in the absence of new mutations. In parallel, epigenetic signatures emerge as key elements in stabilizing oncogenic programs and resistant phenotypes, contributing to the biological plasticity of leukemic cells and representing potentially reversible therapeutic targets. Taken together, multi-omics signatures provide an integrated functional readout of adult ALL and support a dynamic precision-medicine model. However, adaptive therapeutic decisions aimed at relapse prevention require the full integration of these approaches through standardized strategies, longitudinal studies, and a sustainable implementation of molecular profiling and minimal residual disease monitoring.

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) harboring NPM1 mutations constitutes a biologically and clinically distinct subtype, characterized by marked sensitivity to inhibition of the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2. The introduction of venetoclax, a selective BCL-2 inhibitor, in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs), has reshaped the therapeutic paradigm, particularly for patients deemed unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: This review comprehensively analyzes the available scientific evidence—including prospective clinical trials, retrospective cohorts, and real-world studies—to summarize current knowledge on the efficacy, safety, and therapeutic role of venetoclax-based regimens in NPM1-mutated AML. Results and Discussion: Accumulating data demonstrate that venetoclax combined with HMAs achieves high rates of deep molecular remission and significantly improves overall survival in patients with NPM1-mutated AML. Despite these advances, important questions remain regarding the optimal duration of therapy, as well as timing and criteria for treatment discontinuation. Minimal residual disease monitoring is emerging as a pivotal tool to guide therapeutic decisions and enable personalized treatment strategies. Conclusions: Venetoclax-based regimens represent a major advancement in the treatment of NPM1-mutated AML, promoting a shift toward more targeted and less toxic therapeutic approaches. Nonetheless, prospective randomized trials are required to establish standardized clinical algorithms and to refine maintenance and discontinuation strategies, with the ultimate goal of improving patient quality of life and long-term outcomes.

Extramedullary relapse (EMR) of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) represents a clinically and biologically distinct entity compared with medullary relapse, characterized by marked heterogeneity, compartmental immune escape mechanisms, and generally poor prognosis. EMR arises at the intersection of clonal resistance, evolutionary disease adaptation, and heterogeneous distribution of the graft-versus-leukemia effect, resulting in evolutionary trajectories that are often dissociated between medullary and extramedullary compartments. In the absence of prospectively validated therapeutic algorithms, EMR management requires a structured and adaptive approach based on multidimensional assessment integrating leukemia biology, disease burden and anatomical distribution, bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) status, and immune reconstitution. Therapeutic strategies include local treatments, targeted agents, immunotherapies, and immunomodulatory interventions, applied within a dynamic sequence tailored to treatment response. Follow-up plays a central role as an active tool for prognostic stratification and clinical decision-making, enabling early detection of systemic progression and optimization of the timing of consolidative strategies, including second Allo-HSCT in selected patients. An integrated and biologically driven management of post-Allo-HSCT EMR is essential to improve outcomes in this high-risk clinical setting.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a genetically and clinically heterogeneous hematologic malignancy in which intensive induction chemotherapy remains the standard therapeutic platform for medically fit adults. In recent years, however, the frontline treatment paradigm has progressively evolved from a purely cytotoxic approach toward a biologically informed strategy. This shift has been driven by the identification of recurrent molecular alterations—particularly FLT3 and IDH1/2 mutations—as well as renewed interest in antibody-based therapies and the growing recognition that relapse, resistance, and measurable residual disease (MRD) are shaped by clonal architecture rather than blast burden alone. This review examines the development of targeted therapies combined with intensive chemotherapy in AML. We discuss the biological rationale for combination approaches and summarize the key clinical studies that have defined current practice, including trials evaluating FLT3 inhibitors, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, IDH inhibitors, and venetoclax-based strategies. We also address the role of targeted therapy across different treatment phases, including induction, consolidation, and post-remission settings, and analyze emerging data regarding MRD-guided treatment strategies, mechanisms of resistance, and integration with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The integration of targeted agents with intensive chemotherapy is reshaping frontline AML therapy and represents a critical step toward precision medicine. While genotype-directed strategies—such as FLT3 inhibition—have already demonstrated survival benefit, optimal patient selection, treatment sequencing, and duration remain areas of active investigation. Future progress will likely depend on MRD-driven treatment adaptation, improved understanding of clonal evolution, and the development of rational multi-agent combinations capable of achieving deeper and more durable remissions.