Hayley Clements

Dr. Hayley Clements

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 February 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSalvador Lyngdoh
Salvador Lyngdoh
SSShivam Shrotriya
Shivam Shrotriya
SGSurendra P. Goyal
Surendra P. Goyal
HCHayley Clements
Hayley Clements
MHMatt Hayward
Matt Hayward
BHBilal Habib
Bilal Habib
The endangered snow leopard is a large felid that is distributed over 1.83 million km2 globally. Throughout its range it relies on a limited number of prey species in some of the most inhospitable landscapes on the planet where high rates of human persecution exist for both predator and prey. We reviewed 14 published and 11 unpublished studies pertaining to snow leopard diet throughout its range. We calculated prey consumption in terms of frequency of occurrence and biomass consumed based on 1696 analysed scats from throughout the snow leopard's range. Prey biomass consumed was calculated based on the Ackerman's linear correction factor. We identified four distinct physiographic and snow leopard prey type zones, using cluster analysis that had unique prey assemblages and had key prey characteristics which supported snow leopard occurrence there. Levin's index showed the snow leopard had a specialized dietary niche breadth. The main prey of the snow leopard were Siberian ibex (Capra sibrica), blue sheep (Pseudois nayaur), Himalayan tahr (Hemitragus jemlahicus), argali (Ovis ammon) and marmots (Marmota spp). The significantly preferred prey species of snow leopard weighed 55±5 kg, while the preferred prey weight range of snow leopard was 36–76 kg with a significant preference for Siberian ibex and blue sheep. Our meta-analysis identified critical dietary resources for snow leopards throughout their distribution and illustrates the importance of understanding regional variation in species ecology; particularly prey species that have global implications for conservation.

1 June 2020 in Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GCG.S. Cumming
G.S. Cumming
GEGraham Epstein
Graham Epstein
JAJ.M. Anderies
J.M. Anderies
CAC.I. Apetrei
C.I. Apetrei
JBJacopo Baggio
Jacopo Baggio
CWC.M. Weible
C.M. Weible

1 February 2021 in One Earth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EMEnrico Di Minin
Enrico Di Minin
HCHayley Clements
Hayley Clements
RCRicardo Correia
Ricardo Correia
GCGonzalo Cortés-Capano
Gonzalo Cortés-Capano
CFChristoph Fink
Christoph Fink
Corey BradshawCorey Bradshaw
Corey Bradshaw

2 July 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HCHayley Clements
Hayley Clements
CTCraig J. Tambling
Craig J. Tambling
MHMatt Hayward
Matt Hayward
GKGraham I. H. Kerley
Graham I. H. Kerley
Broad-scale models describing predator prey preferences serve as useful departure points for understanding predator-prey interactions at finer scales. Previous analyses used a subjective approach to identify prey weight preferences of the five large African carnivores, hence their accuracy is questionable. This study uses a segmented model of prey weight versus prey preference to objectively quantify the prey weight preferences of the five large African carnivores. Based on simulations of known predator prey preference, for prey species sample sizes above 32 the segmented model approach detects up to four known changes in prey weight preference (represented by model break-points) with high rates of detection (75% to 100% of simulations, depending on number of break-points) and accuracy (within 1.3±4.0 to 2.7±4.4 of known break-point). When applied to the five large African carnivores, using carnivore diet information from across Africa, the model detected weight ranges of prey that are preferred, killed relative to their abundance, and avoided by each carnivore. Prey in the weight ranges preferred and killed relative to their abundance are together termed “accessible prey”. Accessible prey weight ranges were found to be 14–135 kg for cheetah Acinonyx jubatus, 1–45 kg for leopard Panthera pardus, 32–632 kg for lion Panthera leo, 15–1600 kg for spotted hyaena Crocuta crocuta and 10–289 kg for wild dog Lycaon pictus. An assessment of carnivore diets throughout Africa found these accessible prey weight ranges include 88±2% (cheetah), 82±3% (leopard), 81±2% (lion), 97±2% (spotted hyaena) and 96±2% (wild dog) of kills. These descriptions of prey weight preferences therefore contribute to our understanding of the diet spectrum of the five large African carnivores. Where datasets meet the minimum sample size requirements, the segmented model approach provides a means of determining, and comparing, the prey weight range preferences of any carnivore species.

1 January 2016 in Ecology and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAlta De Vos
Alta De Vos
GCGraeme S. Cumming
Graeme S. Cumming
DCDavid H. M. Cumming
David H. M. Cumming
JAJudith M. Ament
Judith M. Ament
JBJulia Baum
Julia Baum
CMChristine Moore
Christine Moore
De Vos, A., G. S. Cumming, D. Cumming, J. M. Ament, J. Baum, H. Clements, J. Grewar, K. Maciejewski, and C. Moore. 2016. Pathogens, disease, and the social-ecological resilience of protected areas. Ecology and Society 21(1):20.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07984-210120

1 May 2016 in Biological Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HCHayley Clements
Hayley Clements
JBJulia Baum
Julia Baum
GCGraeme S. Cumming
Graeme S. Cumming