Background: Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema (CPFE) is a distinct syndrome characterized by upper-lobe emphysema and lower-lobe fibrosis, predominantly in older male smokers. Despite often preserved spirometric volumes, patients exhibit severely reduced diffusing capacity and high susceptibility to complications, including pulmonary hypertension (PH), acute exacerbations, and lung cancer, contributing to poor prognosis. Purpose: This review aims to synthesize current evidence on CPFE, focusing on clinical phenotype, functional impairment, differential diagnosis, complications, and emerging management strategies, highlighting distinctions from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: A narrative review of observational cohorts, retrospective series, and clinical studies examining CPFE patients was performed. Data on demographics, smoking history, symptomatology, pulmonary function, radiology, comorbidities, complications, and treatment approaches were extracted and integrated. Results: CPFE affects mainly males aged 65–70, with >90% reporting > 40 pack–years smoking history. Dyspnea is the cardinal symptom (>95%), often disproportionate to preserved FVC and TLC, accompanied by chronic cough in 30–70%. Exercise-induced desaturation is frequent, correlating with PH, observed in 47–90% of patients. Pulmonary function tests reveal preserved volumes, normal or near-normal FEV1/FVC, and severely reduced DLCO (35–45%), distinguishing CPFE from COPD and IPF. HRCT confirms the combined emphysematous and fibrotic pattern, critical for differential diagnosis. Acute exacerbations occur in 20–28% of cases, lung cancer in 22–46% (mostly squamous cell), and long-term oxygen therapy is required in >70%. Five-year survival is 35–55%, lower than emphysema alone and comparable or worse than IPF. Management focuses on smoking cessation, antifibrotics, oxygen therapy, and complication-specific treatments, and selected patients may undergo lung transplantation. Conclusions: CPFE is a clinically and functionally unique entity with a high burden of pulmonary and systemic complications. Accurate recognition using HRCT and DLCO, along with early intervention and tailored management, is essential to improve patient outcomes and guide prognostic stratification.

Introduction: COPD-OSA overlap syndrome (OVS) is defined by the coexistence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in the same patient; it affects 28.3% of patients evaluated for either condition and is associated with significantly higher mortality compared to either pathology in isolation. Current therapeutic approaches, involving PAP therapy and bronchodilation, treat this syndrome as a homogeneous entity and ignore the biological heterogeneity of this patient population. Objectives: This review proposes a systematic framework for the endotypic classification of biological interactions between COPD and OSA, integrating current literature on the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the OVS, clinically accessible biomarkers, and emerging therapies. Methods: A narrative review based on available literature, focusing on studies published between 2010 and 2026 identified via searches in PubMed, PMC, and Dove Medical Press using the terms: COPD-OSA overlap syndrome, endotype, precision medicine, phenotype, biomarker, dupilumab, and incretin-based therapies. Results: Four clinical phenotypes (obese-metabolic, emphysematous, bronchitic-hypoxemic, and hypercapnic) and three molecular endotypes (Th2/eosinophilic, neutrophilic/oxidative, and metabolic-adipokine) are proposed, each with distinct pathophysiological mechanisms and specific therapeutic implications. The interaction between the two conditions generates a unique, pronounced hypoxemic profile. We propose the “double-hit hypoxemia” model as a conceptual framework characterized by amplified systemic inflammation and increased cardiovascular risk compared to either pathology in isolation. This proposed model has not yet been prospectively validated. Dupilumab (approved for an inflammatory phenotype in COPD patients characterized by eosinophil counts ≥ 300 cells/μL) represents a promising option, though currently unsupported in the OVS population, that could nonetheless be relevant to the Th2/eosinophilic endotype of this syndrome and tirzepatide (which reduced the AHI by up to 23.8 events/hour versus placebo in the SURMOUNT-OSA trial, conducted in patients with obesity and moderate-to-severe OSA, rather than in patients with confirmed OVS) could represent a promising therapy for the metabolic-adipokine endotype of obese patients with OVS. A minimal biomarker panel, comprising blood eosinophils, FeNO, daytime PaCO₂, BMI, and T90, allows for a practical approach to identifying the dominant endotype. Conclusions: Endotyping of OVS may provide a framework for moving beyond a uniform therapeutic approach toward more individualized management based on the dominant underlying biological mechanism. Randomized clinical trials focusing on endotypic stratification and OVS cohorts remain research priorities.

A thoracic finding in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may represent metastatic disease, vascular extension, treatment-related injury, or a complication of cirrhosis, and each carries different implications for staging and care. The mechanism behind the finding therefore matters as much as the finding itself. We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE database for articles published up to August 2026 and screened the reference lists of retrieved articles for additional relevant publications. The narrative review is organised into four domains: direct oncological involvement, vascular dissemination, treatment-related injury, and cirrhosis-associated mimics. Within each domain, computed tomography (CT) provides most of the chest assessment, while magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, and angiography address more specific anatomical or diagnostic questions. We next discuss common patterns of pulmonary metastasis alongside benign nodules common in transplant candidates, and the biological and small-lesion limitations of functional imaging. Thoracic findings gain meaning in the context of hepatic disease, vascular anatomy, and treatment history. Enhancement and alpha-fetoprotein have never been validated as noninvasive rule-out tests for pulmonary metastasis, so the choice between sampling and surveillance rests on multidisciplinary judgement of the costs of uncertainty, procedural feasibility, and evidence strength.