José Mira

Dr. José Mira

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 January 2026 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Priscila MarconcinPriscila Marconcin
Priscila Marconcin
JSJoana Serpa
Joana Serpa
JMJosé Mira
José Mira
ASAna Lúcia Silva
Ana Lúcia Silva
EMEstela São Martinho
Estela São Martinho
Vanessa SantosVanessa Santos
Vanessa Santos
Background/Objectives: Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults, even among those who are physically active. This study examined the associations between skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle power and fall risk in physically active, community-dwelling older adults. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with 280 participants (71.9 ± 5.3 years; 75% women) enrolled in the Stay Up–Falls Prevention Project. Assessments included skeletal muscle mass (anthropometric prediction equation), handgrip strength, lower limb strength and power (Five Times Sit-to-Stand test, 5×STS), and fall history over the past 12 months. Muscle power was calculated from 5×STS performance using the equation proposed by Alcazar and colleagues. Logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. Results: Overall, 26.4% of participants reported at least one fall in the previous year, with a higher prevalence among women (28.9%) than men (18.8%). Fallers showed significantly lower handgrip strength (23.1 vs. 25.4 kg, p = 0.022) and poorer lower limb strength (9.2 vs. 8.7 s, p = 0.007) compared with non-fallers. However, no significant differences were found for skeletal muscle mass or sit-to-stand–derived power. In multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, and medications, lower limb strength remained the only independent variable associated with fall status (OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.11–2.85, p = 0.016). ROC analysis confirmed fair discriminative capacity for 5×STS performance (AUC = 0.616, p = 0.003), with an optimal cut-off of 8.62 s (sensitivity = 78.4%, specificity = 33.0%). Handgrip strength, muscle mass, and power did not show independent associations with fall status. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the 5×STS test provides a simple, cost-effective, and functional indicator for fall-risk stratification in physically active older adults. Clinicians should consider the 5×STS as a sensitive functional indicator that contributes to fall risk stratification, ideally combined with complementary assessments (e.g., balance, gait, cognition) to improve risk stratification and guide preventive interventions in ageing populations.

1 May 2016 in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJosé Mira
José Mira
TLThomas Lapole
Thomas Lapole
RSRobin Souron
Robin Souron
LMLaurent Messonnier
Laurent Messonnier
GMGuillaume Millet
Guillaume Millet
TRThomas Rupp
Thomas Rupp

8 December 2025 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
Priscila MarconcinPriscila Marconcin
Priscila Marconcin
JSJoana Serpa
Joana Serpa
JMJosé Mira
José Mira
ASAna Lúcia Silva
Ana Lúcia Silva
EMEstela São Martinho
Estela São Martinho
Vanessa SantosVanessa Santos
Vanessa Santos
Background/Objectives: Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults, even among those who are physically active. This study examined the associations of skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle power with fall risk in community-dwelling, physically active older adults. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with 280 participants (71.9 ± 5.3 years; 75% women) enrolled in the Stay Up–Falls Prevention Project. Assessments included skeletal muscle mass (anthropometric prediction equation), handgrip strength, lower-limb strength and power (Five Times Sit-to-Stand test, 5xSTS), and fall history over the past 12 months. Muscle power was calculated from 5xSTS performance using the equation proposed by Alcazar and colleagues. Logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. Results: Overall, 26.4% of participants reported at least one fall in the previous year, with a higher prevalence among women (28.9%) than men (18.8%). Fallers showed significantly lower handgrip strength (23.1 vs. 25.4 kg, p = 0.022) and poorer lower-limb strength (9.2 vs. 8.7 s, p = 0.007) compared with non-fallers. However, no significant differences were found for skeletal muscle mass or sit-to-stand–derived power. In multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, and medications, lower-limb strength remained the only independent predictor of falls (OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.11–2.85, p = 0.016). ROC analysis confirmed fair discriminative capacity for 5xSTS performance (AUC = 0.616, p = 0.003), with an optimal cut-off of 8.62 s (sensitivity = 78.4%, specificity = 33.0%). Handgrip strength, muscle mass, and power did not show independent predictive value. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the 5xSTS test provides a simple, cost-effective, and clinically relevant measure for fall-risk screening in active older adults. Clinicians should consider the 5xSTS as a sensitive first-line screening tool, ideally combined with complementary assessments (e.g., balance, gait, cognition) to improve risk stratification and guide preventive interventions in ageing populations.