Introduction: The widespread transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has increased scientific and societal interest in air cleaning technologies, and their potential to mitigate the airborne spread of microorganisms. Here we evaluate room scale use of five mobile air cleaning devices. Methods: A selection of air cleaners, containing high efficiency filtration, was tested using an airborne bacteriophage challenge. Assessments of bioaerosol removal efficacy were undertaken using a decay measurement approach over 3 h, with air cleaner performance compared with bioaerosol decay rate without an air cleaner in the sealed test room. Evidence of chemical by-product emission was also checked, as were total particle counts. Results: Bioaerosol reduction, exceeding natural decay, was observed for all air cleaners. Reductions ranged between devices from 5-log reduction for the most efficacious systems. One system generated detectable ozone within the sealed test room, but ozone was undetectable when the system was run in a normally ventilated room. Total particulate air removal trends aligned with measured airborne bacteriophage decline. Discussion: Air cleaner performance differed, and this could relate to individual air cleaner flow specifications as well as test room conditions, such as air mixing during testing. However, measurable reductions in bioaerosols, beyond natural airborne decay rate, were observed. Conclusion: Under the described test conditions, air cleaners containing high efficiency filtration significantly reduced bioaerosol levels. The best performing air cleaners could be investigated further with improved assay sensitivity, to enable measurement of lower residual levels of bioaerosols.

When transferring highly infective patients to specialist hospitals, safe systems of work minimise the risk to healthcare staff. The EpiShuttle is a patient transport system that was developed to fit into an air ambulance. A validated decontamination procedure is required before the system can be adopted in the UK. Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) vapour fumigation may offer better penetration of the inaccessible parts than the liquid disinfectant wiping that is currently suggested. To validate this, an EpiShuttle was fumigated in a sealed test chamber. Commercial bacterial spore indicators (BIs), alongside organic liquid suspensions and dried surface samples of MS2 bacteriophage (a safe virus surrogate), were placed in and around the EpiShuttle, for the purpose of evaluation. The complete kill of all of the BIs in the five test runs demonstrated the efficacy of the fumigation cycle. The log reduction of the MS2 that was dried on the coupons ranged from 2.66 to 4.50, but the log reduction of the MS2 that was in the organic liquids only ranged from 0.07 to 1.90, confirming the results of previous work. Fumigation with H₂O₂ alone may offer insufficient inactivation of viruses in liquid droplets, therefore a combination of fumigation and disinfectant surface wiping was proposed. Initial fumigation reducing contamination with minimal intervention allows disinfectant wipe cleaning to be completed more safely, with a second fumigation step inactivating the residual pathogens.

A rapid review was undertaken to consider the evidence for human exposure to harmful microorganisms from indoor air and surfaces. Published information about these contaminants, as well as measures to control them, including building design and energy conservation, were included in this review. Information on domestic dwellings, office environments, and other non-industrial settings was assessed to determine the reported prevalence, persistence, and transmission of microorganisms in these settings. Environmental factors that influence indoor microbiological colonization were also included. The evidence strongly indicates that ventilation is the primary factor for controlling indoor dampness, helping to mitigate indoor mold colonization and the accumulation of other indoor contaminants, including infectious microorganisms. Although modern building airtightness, including retrofits of older builds, contributes to thermal comfort and building energy efficiency, this may also limit a building’s ventilation capacity. This in turn can potentially allow biological pollutants to accumulate, increasing the likelihood of harmful exposures and ill-health effects for building occupants. Effective building design and maintenance, which promote appropriate levels of air exchange for indoor spaces, are therefore important for the control of indoor moisture and microbiological contamination.

The performance of 2 disinfectant chemicals, peracetic acid (PAA) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl), was evaluated using a Venturi-nozzle-based light decontamination system (LDS) for delivery. The atomization equipment combined low-pressure air and disinfectant via a handheld lance, producing a fine, dense aerosol. A range of microorganisms, including Bacillus cereus and Bacillus anthracis (Vollum) spores, were used as test challenges to evaluate chemicals and equipment. The tests undertaken included assessments over fixed and variable exposure times, use of multiple surface materials, and a live agent challenge. Over a fixed-time exposure of 60 minutes, aerosolized PAA gave 7- to 8-log reductions of all test challenges, but HOCl was less effective. Material tests showed extensive kill on most surfaces using PAA (≥6-log kill), but HOCl showed more variation (4- to 6-log). Testing using B. anthracis showed measurable PAA induced spore kill inside 5 minutes and >6-log kill at 5 minutes or over. HOCl was less effective. The results demonstrate the importance of testing decontamination systems against a range of relevant microbiological challenges. Disinfectant efficacy may vary depending on product choice, types of challenge microorganisms, and their position in a treated area. The most effective disinfectants demonstrate biocidal efficacy despite these factors. The data confirmed PAA as an effective disinfectant capable of rapidly killing a range of microorganisms, including spores. HOCl was less effective. The LDS system successfully delivered PAA and HOCl over a wide area and could be suitable for a range of frontline biosecurity applications.

Introduction: Modern germicidal ultraviolet C (UVC) equipment can deliver automated UV disinfection treatment by predetermined or self-monitoring cycle. Limited information exists about the performance of such UV systems for treating SARS-CoV-2 and other viral contaminants on surfaces. Published studies differ in their approaches due to the absence of an approved test method. Methods: The ability of germicidal UVC irradiation systems to disinfect surfaces at room and cabinet scale was assessed. Test carriers, seeded with bacteriophage Phi6, were irradiated following a new standard test method. Powered air-purifying respirator equipment was then used to introduce a more demanding challenge. Results: Treatments of seeded carriers using UVC cabinets gave Phi6 log reductions up to 4.58 logs, with little difference between systems. Subsequent treatments, with carriers located on respirator ensembles, were similar, despite shadowing effects. Differences existed for various combinations of cabinet and carrier location. The Phi6 log reduction range was slightly wider for carousel systems, with the most exposed carrier positions giving the greatest Phi6 reductions for seeded respirators. Discussion: Cabinets demonstrated similar performance despite different technical specifications, with maximum observed Phi6 reduction indicating a measurable level of efficacy. There was a more obvious difference in performance between the two carousels, where one delivered an almost twofold higher UVC dose than the other, the most likely explanation for observed performance differences. Conclusion: UVC cabinets and carousels demonstrated Phi6 reductions that could augment routine cleaning measures for reusable respirators. In real-world scenarios, germicidal UVC devices could therefore potentially offer benefits for reducing contact transmission from infectious viruses.

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is important for the developing green/circular economy and is widely used to process different organic wastes and to capture emitted methane. This greenhouse gas can then be used to generate energy. There are over 700 operational AD facilities across the United Kingdom, excluding water treatment plants, a number expected to increase. Accidents have occurred at some sites, resulting in worker injuries and fatalities, demonstrating the challenge of safely managing AD's microbiological and engineering processes. This review is framed around specific areas of health and safety (H&S) concern that consider the availability of AD‐related H&S standards and guidance, AD hazards, and precursor events that may lead to equipment failures. Process indicators were also examined, as these can inform AD H&S risk management. Guidance and standards were identified that support safe AD plant commissioning and operation. Peer‐reviewed studies clearly described hazards within the AD process, including fire, explosion, and asphyxiant/toxic gas release, with the preventive and risk‐mitigating measures that can help to control them. Some studies concluded that accidents related to plant operation were often avoidable if the correct training and controls are in place.