The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of focused low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (FLIPUS) therapy on the functional and health status of patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). A total of 106 subjects with bilateral KOA were randomized sequentially into two groups. Group I received FLIPUS + diclofenac sodium, and group II received sham FLIPUS + diclofenac sodium. The therapeutic effects of the interventions were evaluated by measuring changes in VAS pain, the WOMAC scores, and the LI scores after 10 days of treatment as well as changes in LI and VAS at follow-up, 4 and 12 weeks later. In addition, changes in the range of motion, ambulation speed, and the SF-36 in each group were recorded after 10 days of treatment. Compared with those in group II, patients in group Ishowed significant improvements in VAS, WOMAC, LI, ambulation speed, and most items in the SF-36 after 10 days of treatment. In addition, patients in group I showed significant improvements in LI and VAS at follow-up. There were no FLIPUS-related adverse events during and after the interventions. In conclusion, FLIPUS is a safe and effective treatment modality for relieving pain and improving the functions and quality of life of patients with KOA.

To investigate the promoting effects and mechanisms of low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) on the migration of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). The BMSCs migration was researched from cell and animal experiments. In the cell experiment, the BMSCs was treated using LIPUS (30 mW/cm², 20 min/day, 2 days), and the wound healing and transwell migration were observed. In the animal experiment, the BMSCs labelled with green fluorescent protein (GFP) were injected into rats with femoral defects via the tail vein (1 × 10⁶/mL). The healing of bone was detected using x-ray and sampled for hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining and fluorescence microscopy. About the mechanisms, the cellular F-actin of cytoskeleton was stained with FITC-phalloidin. The changes of BMSCs genes after LIPUS treatment were screened using microarray assay and verified using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The biological processes of those genes were predicted by KEGG analysis. The protein expression levels of FAK, ERK1/2 and myosin II related migration were detected using western blotting. The results showed LIPUS promoted the BMSCs migration (p < .05) without significant temperature changes (p > .05) in vitro and in vivo than control group (p < .05). The cytoskeletal rearrangement was carried out, and the ITGA8 gene related with cell migration was found with high expression after LIPUS treatment (p < .05). FAK inhibitor (PF-573228) and ERK1/2 inhibitor (U0126) were proved, in turn, decreased the BMSCs migration induced using LIPUS (p < .05). LIPUS can promote the BMSCs migration in vitro and in vivo, one mechanism may be related to the activation of FAK-ERK1/2 signalling pathways using LIPUS. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT Experiments in vivo and in vitro were designed to explore the migration and mechanisms of BMSCs treated using LIPUS.

Objective: To compare the pregnancy outcomes between ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation and laparoscopic myomectomy (LM). Materials and methods: This study included 676 women with symptomatic uterine fibroids who wished to become pregnant underwent USgHIFU or LM at three hospitals in China from 1 May 2009 to 31 May 2018. The related information of pregnancy and delivery were followed up and analyzed using the chi-square test and two-sided Student t-test. Results: The median follow-up duration was 5 (1–8) years; 20 patients (2.9%) were lost to follow-up. 320 patients were treated with UsgHIFU, and 336 were treated with LM. Two hundred nineteen (68.4%) women became pregnant after USgHIFU ablation, and 224 (66.7%) became pregnant after LM. Four hundred forty-three patients had 501 pregnancies (natural pregnancies, 405; in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer pregnancies, 38). Average times to pregnancy were 13.6 ± 9.5 months after USgHIFU and 18.9 ± 7.3 months after LM (p < 0.05). The rate of cesarean delivery was lower in the USgHIFU group (41.6%) than in the LM group (54.9%) (p < 0.05). Incidences of placenta increta, placenta previa, and postpartum hemorrhage were low after USgHIFU compared with after LM. Incidences of preterm birth, fetal distress, fetal growth restriction, and puerperal infection were higher after USgHIFU than after LM. There was a risk of uterine rupture after both procedures. Conclusions: Compared with LM, USgHIFU ablation can significantly shorten the time to pregnancy, although pregnancy rates of the two procedures are similar. Some risks in pregnancy and delivery after HIFU should be evaluated and monitored.