AYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS

Dr. AYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 January 2016 in Environmental Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Mehmet İrfan YeşilnacarMehmet İrfan Yeşilnacar
Mehmet İrfan Yeşilnacar
AYAYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS
AYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS
ÇDÇoruh Türksel Dülgergil
Çoruh Türksel Dülgergil
Mustafa KumralMustafa Kumral
Mustafa Kumral
Ayse Dilek AtasoyAyse Dilek Atasoy
Ayse Dilek Atasoy
MAMurat Aydoğdu
Murat Aydoğdu

4 January 2021 in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AYAYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS
AYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS
NKNilgun Kahraman
Nilgun Kahraman
Mehmet İrfan YeşilnacarMehmet İrfan Yeşilnacar
Mehmet İrfan Yeşilnacar
HKHatice Kara
Hatice Kara

19 May 2020 in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AOAyse Ozguven
Ayse Ozguven
AYAYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS
AYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS

11 October 2021 in Environmental Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HKHatice Kara
Hatice Kara
AYAYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS
AYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS
HTHamdi Temel
Hamdi Temel

15 January 2021 in Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AYAYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS
AYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS
Mehmet İrfan YeşilnacarMehmet İrfan Yeşilnacar
Mehmet İrfan Yeşilnacar
MAMusa Ataş
Musa Ataş

11 July 2024 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AYAYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS
AYSEGUL DEMIR YETIS
NINagehan İlHan
Nagehan İlHan
HKHatice Kara
Hatice Kara
Groundwater resources in Bitlis province and its surroundings in Türkiye’s Eastern Anatolia Region are pivotal for drinking water, yet they face a significant threat from fluoride contamination, compounded by the region’s volcanic rock structure. To address this concern, fluoride levels were meticulously measured at 30 points in June 2019 dry period and September 2019 rainy period. Despite the accuracy of present measurement techniques, their time-consuming nature renders them economically unviable. Therefore, this study aims to assess the distribution of probable geogenic contamination of groundwater and develop a robust prediction model by analyzing the relationship between predictive variables and target contaminants. In this pursuit, various machine learning techniques and regression models, including Linear Regression, Random Forest, Decision Tree, K-Neighbors, and XGBoost, as well as deep learning models such as ANN, DNN, CNN, and LSTM, were employed. Elements such as aluminum (Al), boron (B), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), phosphorus (Pb), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) were utilized as features to predict fluoride levels. The SelectKbest feature selection method was used to improve the accuracy of the prediction model. This method identifies important features in the dataset for different values of k and increases model efficiency. The models were able to produce more accurate predictions by selecting the most important variables. The findings highlight the superior performance of the XGBoost regressor and CNN in predicting groundwater quality, with XGBoost consistently outperforming other models, exhibiting the lowest values for evaluation metrics like mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) across different k values. For instance, when considering all features, XGBoost attained an MSE of 0.07, an MAE of 0.22, an RMSE of 0.27, a MAPE of 9.25%, and an NSE of 0.75. Conversely, the Decision Tree regressor consistently displayed inferior performance, with its maximum MSE reaching 0.11 (k = 5) and maximum RMSE of 0.33 (k = 5). Furthermore, feature selection analysis revealed the consistent significance of boron (B) and cadmium (Cd) across all datasets, underscoring their pivotal roles in groundwater contamination. Notably, in the machine learning framework evaluation, the XGBoost regressor excelled in modeling both the “all” and “rainy season” datasets, while the convolutional neural network (CNN) outperformed in the “dry season” dataset. This study emphasizes the potential of XGBoost regressor and CNN for accurate groundwater quality prediction and recommends their utilization, while acknowledging the limitations of the Decision Tree Regressor.