Héctor Saldaña-Márquez

Dr. Héctor Saldaña-Márquez

Tolun: Urbanism, Housing, Research
orcid
Research Professor in University of Monterrey

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2018 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Héctor Saldaña-MárquezHéctor Saldaña-Márquez
Héctor Saldaña-Márquez
José Manuel Gómez-SoberónJosé Manuel Gómez-Soberón
José Manuel Gómez-Soberón
SRSusana Paola Arredondo Rea
Susana Paola Arredondo Rea
DGDiana C. Gámez-García
Diana C. Gámez-García
Ramón Corral HigueraRamón Corral Higuera
Ramón Corral Higuera

3 August 2018 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDiana Carolina Gámez García
Diana Carolina Gámez García
José Manuel Gómez-SoberónJosé Manuel Gómez-Soberón
José Manuel Gómez-Soberón
Ramón Corral HigueraRamón Corral Higuera
Ramón Corral Higuera
Héctor Saldaña-MárquezHéctor Saldaña-Márquez
Héctor Saldaña-Márquez
MSMaría Consolación Gómez Soberón
María Consolación Gómez Soberón
SRSusana Paola Arredondo Rea
Susana Paola Arredondo Rea
This research focuses on a comparison of 20 external wall systems that are conventionally used in Spanish residential buildings, from a perspective based on the product and construction process stages of the life cycle assessment. The primary objective is to provide data that allow knowing the environmental behavior of walls built with materials and practices conventionally. This type of analysis will enable promoting the creation of regulations that encourage the use of combinations of materials that generate the most environmentally suitable result, and in turn, contribute to the strengthening of the embodied stages study of buildings and their elements. The results indicate that the greatest impact arises in the product stage (90.9%), followed by the transport stage (8.9%) and the construction process stage (<1%). Strategies (such as the use of large-format pieces and the controlled increase in thickness of the thermal insulation) can contribute to reducing the environmental impact; on the contrary, practices such as the use of small-format pieces and laminated plasterboard can increase the environmental burden. The prediction of the environmental behavior (simulation equation) allows these possible impacts to be studied in a fast and simplified way.

1 January 2019 in Sustainable Cities and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGDiana C. Gámez-García
Diana C. Gámez-García
Héctor Saldaña-MárquezHéctor Saldaña-Márquez
Héctor Saldaña-Márquez
José Manuel Gómez-SoberónJosé Manuel Gómez-Soberón
José Manuel Gómez-Soberón
Ramón Corral HigueraRamón Corral Higuera
Ramón Corral Higuera
SRSusana Paola Arredondo Rea
Susana Paola Arredondo Rea

23 July 2019 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDiana Carolina Gámez García
Diana Carolina Gámez García
Héctor Saldaña-MárquezHéctor Saldaña-Márquez
Héctor Saldaña-Márquez
José Manuel Gómez-SoberónJosé Manuel Gómez-Soberón
José Manuel Gómez-Soberón
SRSusana Paola Arredondo Rea
Susana Paola Arredondo Rea
MSMaría Consolación Gómez Soberón
María Consolación Gómez Soberón
Ramón Corral HigueraRamón Corral Higuera
Ramón Corral Higuera
Social Housing (SH) in Mexico has a potentially important role in reducing both the emission of greenhouse gases and the use of non-renewable resources, two of the main challenges facing not only Mexico but the planet as a whole. This work assesses the environmental impact generated by the embodied stages of a typical SH throughout its life cycle (cradle to grave), by means of a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Two types of envelope and interior walls and three types of windows are compared. It was found that SH emits 309 kg CO2 eq/m2 and consumes 3911 MJ eq/m2 in the product stages (A1 to A3) and construction process (A4 to A5); the most important stages are those referring to the products, namely, A1 to A3, B4 (replacement) and B2 (maintenance). Additionally, benefits were found in the use of lightweight and thermal materials, such as concrete blocks lightened with pumice or windows made of PVC or wood. Although the use of LCA is incipient in the housing and construction sector in Mexico, this work shows how its application is not only feasible but recommended as it may become a basic tool in the search for sustainability.

21 March 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DGDiana Carolina Gámez-García
Diana Carolina Gámez-García
AVAdrián Jesús Vargas-Leal
Adrián Jesús Vargas-Leal
DSDavid Armando Serrania-Guerra
David Armando Serrania-Guerra
JBJulian Graciano Gonzalez Borrego
Julian Graciano Gonzalez Borrego
Héctor Saldaña-MárquezHéctor Saldaña-Márquez
Héctor Saldaña-Márquez
In Mexico, approximately 6.5 million tons of plastic waste is generated, of which 38–58% is improperly managed and has the potential to leak into the environment. Furthermore, producing natural aggregates is associated with the unsustainable use of non-renewable resources. In this sense, this work aimed to evaluate the influence that recycled aggregates from plastic waste have on the behavior of concrete. Coarse aggregates of thermoplastic paint (TP) from paving waste were prepared and incorporated into four mixes, with concentrations of 5 to 20%. In addition, three mixes with fine aggregates from PET were evaluated as one reference mix. The studied properties were slump, compressive strength, flexural strength, rebound number, density, absorption, and porosity. The results indicate that both aggregates have significant potential for use in concrete, including structural use, when replacement percentages of around 5% are considered, with property losses not exceeding 8%. Their use is proposed for active mobility infrastructure, with percentages of up to 20% analyzed in this study. Finally, it is necessary to analyze the influence that the incorporation of plastic waste has on mitigating environmental impacts, as well as the durability properties.

7 August 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Héctor Saldaña-MárquezHéctor Saldaña-Márquez
Héctor Saldaña-Márquez
DGDiana Carolina Gámez García
Diana Carolina Gámez García
José Manuel Gómez-SoberónJosé Manuel Gómez-Soberón
José Manuel Gómez-Soberón
SRSusana Paola Arredondo Rea
Susana Paola Arredondo Rea
Ramón Corral HigueraRamón Corral Higuera
Ramón Corral Higuera
MSMaría Consolación Gómez Soberón
María Consolación Gómez Soberón
This study presents a comparative analysis of the housing indicators used by the single-family housing rating systems (SHRSs), in which the residential urban environment (RUE) influences buildings’ certification scores, emphasizing the relationships of six systems developed by middle-income countries (MICs)—BEST, CASA, GBI, BERDE, Green Homes, and LOTUS—and the two most-recognized rating systems, BREEAM and LEED. The aim is to provide new housing indicators that are capable of bringing the concept of sustainability into the cities of MICs. The results reveal that the percentage of influence that single-family housing (SFH) can achieve in the metric established by each system is relatively low. However, considering all of the identified indicators, this influence could increase to 53.16% of the total score in multi-criteria evaluations. Furthermore, a significant lack of indicators for mandatory criteria evaluations was found, with CASA being the only system that considers their inclusion. This paper identifies 37 indicators for multi-criteria assessments and two for mandatory-criteria assessments, providing new perspectives on several topics. Furthermore, the methodology established to obtain the indicators could be useful for other researchers in the identification of new sustainable indicators.