This study explores the relationship between institutional shareholders and climate-related disclosure (CRD) and how sustainability committees influence this relationship among publicly listed Malaysian firms. For the analysis, 990 firm-year observations were studied from 198 highly polluting firms from 2021 to 2024. A strong CRD index was designed using the recognized climate reporting frameworks and well-grounded literature to assess the level of climate-related disclosure. Fixed-effects and hierarchical panel regression models show that CRD increases when institutional investor ownership increases, meaning firms with more institutional investors disclose more information on climate-related topics. In addition, a sustainability committee at the board level greatly improves this relationship by highlighting the positive impact of strong internal governance. As a result, such committees establish climate management and improve communication with investors, making the firm’s actions more transparent. The findings of this study are consistent with agency and legitimacy theories because institutional investors assist in monitoring firms’ environmental performance, and sustainability committees help the company maintain these standards internally. Further, this study helps grow the understanding of corporate governance (CG) and sustainability by pointing out that the presence of institutional owners and sustainability committees can promote openness about climate matters. Accordingly, these findings can guide policymakers, investors, and business leaders in boosting responsible environmental reporting and sustainable business practices in developing countries.

This study examines the impact of corporate sustainability practices on firm performance, sustainable development, and value by focusing on ESG performance, sustainability committees, and sustainability reporting. While prior literature documents a general association between ESG performance and firm value, limited attention has been paid to the role of sustainability governance structures and their contribution to sustainable development outcomes, particularly SDGs disclosure, in a multi-country setting. Sustainable development is proxied by an SDGs disclosure index constructed using firm-level disclosures aligned with the 17 Sustainable Development Goals based on LSEG (Refinitiv) ESG item-level data. The analysis controls for firm size, leverage, profitability, industry-, and country-level institutional factors to ensure robust results. Using panel data comprising 36,438 firm-year observations from 6073 companies across OECD member countries from 2017 to 2022, this study employs a fixed-effects model based on diagnostic tests, including the Hausman and Breusch–Pagan tests. The findings revealed that higher ESG performance scores positively influence both sustainable development outcomes and market value. Moreover, the presence of sustainability committees and broader sustainability reporting further strengthens these relationships. These results highlight the importance of institutional sustainability governance in translating ESG commitments into measurable firm values and SDG-related outcomes. This study provides novel empirical evidence on how sustainability-focused governance mechanisms enhance corporate contributions to sustainable development, offering important implications for managers and policymakers as well as directions for future research.

This research examines the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and perceived financial performance (FP) in the Saudi Arabian banking industry using the mediating variables of employee engagement (EE) and green creativity (GC). This study is based on the Social Identity Theory and considers CSR as an engine to produce ethical and social results and promote environmental innovation and sustainable competitiveness. According to a survey of 650 banking employees and structural equation modeling (SEM), the results show that CSR significantly and positively affects EE, GC, and FP, with EE having the strongest mediating role. These conclusions highlight the strategic consequence of CSR in advancing sustainability by balancing financial performance, employee welfare, and environmental innovation. This study adds value to the existing body of research because it provides information on the CSR-FP relationship in a developing economy, where such information is scarcely available. Consistent with the definition of sustainability, this study indicates how CSR activities combine social, environmental, and economic aspects to foster long-term organizational sustainability and sustainable development.

This study examines the impact of ESG disclosure, leverage, and profitability on firm value, measured by Tobin’s Q, among 67 non-financial Tadawul-listed companies in Saudi Arabia over the period 2015–2024. ESG disclosure is captured through a manual content-analysis index that scores the proportion of expected environmental, social, and governance items reported by each firm. The study further investigates whether board independence moderates these relationships while controlling for liquidity, firm size, current ratio, capital expenditure, and board size. Methodologically, the study employs the two-step system generalized method of moments (system GMM) estimator, which addresses dynamic persistence, endogeneity, and unobserved heterogeneity. The findings reveal that ESG disclosure has a positive and significant effect on firm value, indicating that the Saudi market increasingly rewards firms that provide broader sustainability-related information. Profitability also exerts a positive influence on Tobin’s Q, while leverage has a negative and significant effect, suggesting that higher debt weakens market valuation. Among the moderating effects, board independence significantly reduces the negative impact of leverage on firm value, although it does not significantly strengthen the positive ESG disclosure–firm value relationship. The results also show that liquidity, firm size, capital expenditure, and board size positively influence firm value. The study’s novelty lies in being the first, to our knowledge, to integrate ESG disclosure, financial structure, profitability, and board independence within a single dynamic firm-value framework over a decade-long panel that brackets the Saudi Exchange’s 2021 ESG disclosure guideline. In doing so, it advances emerging-market ESG research by showing that, under Saudi Arabia’s largely voluntary disclosure regime and concentrated-ownership structure, board independence operates primarily as a risk-monitoring mechanism rather than as an amplifier of disclosure value. The findings imply that regulators should strengthen and progressively mandate ESG reporting frameworks, that investors should treat ESG transparency as value-relevant information, and that firms should view ESG transparency and prudent governance as strategic tools for enhancing market value in line with Vision 2030.

This study examines whether environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure reduces firm risk among 73 non-financial Tadawul-listed companies in Saudi Arabia over 2015–2024, with particular attention to the moderating role of board independence. Firm risk is measured as the annualized standard deviation of daily stock returns, and ESG disclosure is captured by the LSEG (Refinitiv) ESG score. A two-way (firm and year) fixed-effects model with Windmeijer-consistent inference is used as the primary specification to identify the within-firm association between ESG disclosure and firm risk, while a two-step dynamic System Generalized Method of Moments (System GMM) estimator is reported as a robustness approach to address dynamic persistence, reverse causality, and unobserved heterogeneity. The findings indicate that the effect of ESG disclosure on firm risk is conditional rather than uniform. In the fixed-effects baseline, ESG disclosure is associated with lower firm risk, and this conditional pattern is confirmed under System GMM: once the interaction with board independence is introduced, the direct effect is no longer risk-reducing; instead, the negative and highly significant interaction term shows that ESG disclosure lowers firm risk mainly when board independence is high. Leverage consistently raises firm risk, while profitability reduces it in the moderation model. The study recommends that regulators pair ESG reporting requirements with stricter board-independence enforcement, that firms treat governance reform as a complement to sustainability reporting rather than a substitute, and that investors interpret ESG disclosure jointly with board structure when assessing firm risk. The study contributes to stakeholder, signaling, and agency theory by showing that ESG disclosure operates as a governance-dependent risk-management mechanism rather than an unconditional one.