Glofitamab is a CD3xCD20 bi‐specific antibody with two fragments directed to the CD20 antigen and a single CD3‐binding fragment. Encouraging response and survival rates were recently reported in a pivotal phase II expansion trial conducted in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B‐cell lymphoma. However, the real‐world data of patients of all ages with no strict selection criteria are still lacking. Herein, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who received glofitamab via compassionate use in Turkey. Forty‐three patients from 20 centers who received at least one dose of the treatment were included in this study. The median age was 54 years. The median number of previous therapies was 4, and 23 patients were refractory to first‐line treatment. Twenty patients had previously undergone autologous stem cell transplantation. The median follow‐up time was 5.7 months. In efficacy‐evaluable patients, 21% and 16% of them achieved complete response and partial response, respectively. The median response duration was 6.3 months. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 3.3 and 8.8 months, respectively. None of the treatment‐responsive patients progressed during the study period, and their estimated 1‐year PFS and OS rate was 83%. The most frequently reported toxicity was hematological toxicity. Sixteen patients survived, while 27 died at the time of the analysis. The most common cause of death was disease progression. One patient died of cytokine release syndrome during the first cycle after receiving the first dose of glofitamab. Meanwhile, two patients died due to glofitamab‐related febrile neutropenia. This is the largest real‐world study on the effectiveness and toxicity of glofitamab treatment in R/R DLBCL patients. The median OS of 9 months seems promising in this heavily pretreated group. The toxicity related mortality rates were the primary concerns in this study.

It is generally well-understood that iron-mediated cardiomyopathy is the major complication that can arise from beta thalassemia major (TM). Therefore, early diagnosis, risk stratification, and the effective treatment of beta TM patients are clinically important to optimize long-term positive outcomes. This study included 57 beta TM patients with a mean age of 25 ± 7 years. We determined the serum ferritin level, echocardiography, heart rate recovery (HRR), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) T2* in all patients. CMR T2* findings were categorized as normal myocardium (T2* > 20 ms), and myocardial involvement (T2* ≤ 20 ms). HRR values at 1-5 min (HRR1-5) were recorded; Subsequently. HRR was calculated by subtracting the heart rate at each time point from the heart rate at peak exercise. There was a significant negative correlation between the serum ferritin level and the cardiac T2* MRI findings (r = -0.34, p = 0.009). A similar result was found in the negative correlation between serum ferritin and all heart rate recovery values. There was a significant positive correlation between HRR1, HRR2, and HRR3 values, and CMR T2* (T2* heart rate recovery (HRR)1: r = 0.51, p < 0.001; T2* HRR2: r = 0.48, p < 0.001; T2* HRR3: r = 0.47, p < 0.001, respectively). The serum ferritin level and echocardiography can be used to predict the presence of myocardial iron load in beta TM patients. Therefore, HRR can be used to screen beta TM patients, and the clinical use of HRR can be a predictive marker for autonomic dysfunction in beta TM patients.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to detect the incidences of ototoxicity in patients with hemoglobinopathies taking deferoxamine (DFO), deferiprone, and deferasirox using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale to obtain more objective data. MATERIALS and METHODS: Fifty-five transfusion-dependent patients were evaluated in this study. The NCI CTCAE scale was used to assess ototoxicity levels. The average ferritin and hemoglobin levels, the type of iron chelator, and the duration of therapy of all the patients were recorded. RESULTS: Ototoxicity was observed in 15 patients (31.9 %), all of whom were taking DFO. The median age was 19.5 (6–43) in patients without ototoxicity and 29 (16–50) in those with ototoxicity; this difference was statistically significant (p0.05). Ototoxicity was not observed in the eight patients who used only deferasirox and deferiprone. CONCLUSION: The ototoxicity incidence with DFO at doses below 50 mg/kg/day was 27.3%. Deferiprone and deferasirox were not associated with ototoxic effects in patients taking these drugs.