Yunlong Sui

Dr. Yunlong Sui

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 April 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YSYunlong Sui
Yunlong Sui
QGQiang Gao
Qiang Gao
The motivation of this paper is to explore the influence of farmers’ endowments and technology perceptions on farmers’ green production technology adoption behaviors. Based on a survey of 471 grain farmers in the main grain-producing areas of Shandong Province, the Heckman model was used to empirically analyze the influence of farmers’ endowments on their adoption behavior of green production technologies, and the moderating effect of technology perception on the relationship between the two was further investigated. The study showed that: (1) More than half of the farmers adopted more than three green production technologies, and only 11.5% did not adopt them. In terms of adoption structure, the adoption rate of green pest control technology was the highest at 67.7%, while the adoption rate of moderate deep pine technology was the lowest at 32.7%. The adoption structure should be further optimized. (2) After controlling for sample selection bias, farmers’ endowments have a significant positive effect on farmers’ green production technology adoption behaviors. The ordinary least square regression overestimates the main effect of farmers’ endowments by 8.5% compared with the Heckman model. (3) Technology cognition can effectively promote the positive effect of farmers’ endowments on green production technology adoption, in which the moderating effect of technology–economic cognition is higher than that of technology–environmental cognition. (4) There is heterogeneity in the effects of farmers’ endowments and technology cognition on different adoption subjects and technology types. The above findings provide an in-depth explanation for activating the endogenous drivers of green agriculture development.

10 October 2025 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YSYunlong Sui
Yunlong Sui
LYLianghong Yu
Lianghong Yu
The quality risks of land trusteeship services are increasingly prominent, leading to reduced crop yields for farmers and land degradation; however, relevant research remains insufficient. This paper aims to identify and evaluate the quality risk level of land trusteeship services. It comprehensively adopts a field survey, web crawler technology, and expert consultation methods to identify quality risk types, and then uses the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to assess the risk level based on survey data from Chinese farmers. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Overall, the quality risk level of land trusteeship services is at a relatively high risk level. In terms of spatio-temporal patterns, the quality risk level shows an upward trend, and the quality risk level of mid-production services is increasing at the fastest rate. There are significant variations in service quality risk across prefecture-level cities in the Shandong Province of China. (2) In terms of risk heterogeneity, the quality risk level of small-scale pure farmers is higher than that of part-time farmers and large professional farmers, in that order. The quality risk level of the “farmer + service organization” model is higher than that of the “farmer + intermediary + service organization” model. According to the order of the quality risk level of different crops, the ranking (from highest to lowest) is cash crops, wheat, and corn. (3) The high quality risks of land trusteeship services will impact the multifunctionality of land systems. It exacerbates the land pollution and fertility degradation because of excessive application of chemical inputs like pesticides, fertilizers, and mulch by service organizations. It consequently destroys ecological systems, hinders sustainable agricultural development, and impacts farmers’ income and national food security by reducing yields. The research findings contribute to controlling the quality risks of land trusteeship services and protecting land.

2 December 2025 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HZHaoyang Zou
Haoyang Zou
YSYunlong Sui
Yunlong Sui
WLWei Lu
Wei Lu
TWTeng Wang
Teng Wang
DGDedong Guo
Dedong Guo
ZLZhiye Liu
Zhiye Liu
Severe asphalt ageing and the difficulty in dispersing agglomerated particles within reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) hinder the uniform blending of virgin and aged mineral aggregates during plant-mixed hot recycling, compromising the durability of the recycled asphalt mixture. To accurately quantify the degree of blending between virgin and aged aggregate during thermal recycling and to optimise the mix design and mixing process for thermally recycled asphalt mixtures, a test method has been proposed. This method comprises key steps, including the preparation of asphalt mixtures, separation of virgin and aged materials, separation of the binder from aggregate, and calculation of the blending degree. It analyses the impact of varying mixing conditions on the blending degree of virgin and aged aggregate during the thermal recycling process. The results indicate that complete homogenization of virgin and aged aggregates during mixing is unattainable, with blending efficiency ranging from 40% to 60%. Increasing the amount of RAP has a negligible effect on blending efficiency. Appropriate increases in the amount of rejuvenating agent, mixing temperature, mixing time, and asphalt content enhance blending efficiency by 10% to 30%. The mixing sequence where RAP is first blended with virgin aggregate before incorporating virgin asphalt further enhances the blending efficiency of virgin and aged aggregates by approximately 20%. However, mixing temperatures exceeding 160 °C and mixing times exceeding 270 s caused secondary ageing of the asphalt, adversely affecting the blending degree of virgin and aged aggregates.