Joel Mainland

Dr. Joel Mainland

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 March 2009 in Science Signaling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HSHarumi Saito
Harumi Saito
QCQiuyi Chi
Qiuyi Chi
HZHanyi Zhuang
Hanyi Zhuang
HMHiroaki Matsunami
Hiroaki Matsunami
JMJoel Mainland
Joel Mainland
Identification of mammalian olfactory receptor agonists enables development of a predictive model of receptor activation.

24 February 2017 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AKAndreas Keller
Andreas Keller
RGRichard C. Gerkin
Richard C. Gerkin
YGYuanfang Guan
Yuanfang Guan
ADAmit Dhurandhar
Amit Dhurandhar
GTGabor Turu
Gabor Turu
PMPablo Meyer
Pablo Meyer
How will this molecule smell?: We still do not understand what a given substance will smell like. Keller et al. launched an international crowd-sourced competition in which many teams tried to solve how the smell of a molecule will be perceived by humans. The teams were given access to a database of responses from subjects who had sniffed a large number of molecules and been asked to rate each smell across a range of different qualities. The teams were also given a comprehensive list of the physical and chemical features of the molecules smelled. The teams produced algorithms to predict the correspondence between the quality of each smell and a given molecule. The best models that emerged from this challenge could accurately predict how a new molecule would smell. Science , this issue p. 820

8 December 2013 in Nature Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJoel Mainland
Joel Mainland
AKAndreas Keller
Andreas Keller
YLYun Li
Yun Li
TZTing Zhou
Ting Zhou
CTCasey Trimmer
Casey Trimmer
HMHiroaki Matsunami
Hiroaki Matsunami
In this study, Mainland and colleagues de-orphan 18 human odorant receptors and find that 68% of these receptors exhibit polymorphisms that affect their function in vitro. They also show that the polymorphisms in one these odorant receptors, OR10G4, affect odor intensity and valence perception thus linking the molecular functioning of a single odorant receptor to human olfactory perception. Humans have ∼400 intact odorant receptors, but each individual has a unique set of genetic variations that lead to variation in olfactory perception. We used a heterologous assay to determine how often genetic polymorphisms in odorant receptors alter receptor function. We identified agonists for 18 odorant receptors and found that 63% of the odorant receptors we examined had polymorphisms that altered in vitro function. On average, two individuals have functional differences at over 30% of their odorant receptor alleles. To show that these in vitro results are relevant to olfactory perception, we verified that variations in OR10G4 genotype explain over 15% of the observed variation in perceived intensity and over 10% of the observed variation in perceived valence for the high-affinity in vitro agonist guaiacol but do not explain phenotype variation for the lower-affinity agonists vanillin and ethyl vanillin.

8 December 2005 in Chemical Senses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJoel Mainland
Joel Mainland
NSNoam Sobel
Noam Sobel
In this review, we use data obtained primarily from humans to argue that sniffs are not merely a stimulus carrier but are rather a central component of the olfactory percept. We argue that sniffs 1) are necessary for the olfactory percept, 2) affect odorant intensity perception and identity perception, 3) drive activity in olfactory cortex, 4) are rapidly modulated in an odorant-dependent fashion by a dedicated olfactomotor system, and 5) are sufficient to generate an olfactory percept of some sort even in the absence of odor.

22 May 2017 in Chemical Senses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSanne Boesveldt
Sanne Boesveldt
EPElbrich M Postma
Elbrich M Postma
DBDuncan Boak
Duncan Boak
AWAntje Welge-Luessen
Antje Welge-Luessen
VSVeronika Schöpf
Veronika Schöpf
VDValerie B Duffy
Valerie B Duffy
Anosmia and hyposmia, the inability or decreased ability to smell, is estimated to afflict 3–20% of the population. Risk of olfactory dysfunction increases with old age and may also result from chronic sinonasal diseases, severe head trauma, and upper respiratory infections, or neurodegenerative diseases. These disorders impair the ability to sense warning odors in foods and the environment, as well as hinder the quality of life related to social interactions, eating, and feelings of well-being. This article reports and extends on a clinical update commencing at the 2016 Association for Chemoreception Sciences annual meeting. Included were reports from: a patient perspective on losing the sense of smell with information on Fifth Sense, a nonprofit advocacy organization for patients with olfactory disorders; an otolaryngologist’s review of clinical evaluation, diagnosis, and management/treatment of anosmia; and researchers’ review of recent advances in potential anosmia treatments from fundamental science, in animal, cellular, or genetic models. As limited evidence-based treatments exist for anosmia, dissemination of information on anosmia-related health risks is needed. This could include feasible and useful screening measures for olfactory dysfunction, appropriate clinical evaluation, and patient counseling to avoid harm as well as manage health and quality of life with anosmia.

1 September 2023 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BLBrian K. Lee
Brian K. Lee
EMEmily J. Mayhew
Emily J. Mayhew
BSBenjamin Sanchez-Lengeling
Benjamin Sanchez-Lengeling
JWJennifer N. Wei
Jennifer N. Wei
WQWesley W. Qian
Wesley W. Qian
AWAlexander B. Wiltschko
Alexander B. Wiltschko
Mapping molecular structure to odor perception is a key challenge in olfaction. We used graph neural networks to generate a principal odor map (POM) that preserves perceptual relationships and enables odor quality prediction for previously uncharacterized odorants. The model was as reliable as a human in describing odor quality: On a prospective validation set of 400 out-of-sample odorants, the model-generated odor profile more closely matched the trained panel mean than did the median panelist. By applying simple, interpretable, theoretically rooted transformations, the POM outperformed chemoinformatic models on several other odor prediction tasks, indicating that the POM successfully encoded a generalized map of structure-odor relationships. This approach broadly enables odor prediction and paves the way toward digitizing odors.