Background: The usefulness of right heart catherization (RHC) has long been debated, and thus, we aimed to study the real‐world impact of the use of RHC in cardiogenic shock. Methods and Results: In the Nationwide Readmissions Database using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision ( ICD‐1 0 ), we identified 236 156 patient hospitalizations with cardiogenic shock between 2016 and 2017. We sought to evaluate the impact of RHC during index hospitalization on management strategies, complications, and outcomes as well as on 30‐day readmission rate. A total 25 840 patients (9.6%) received RHC on index admission. The RHC group had significantly more comorbidities compared with the non‐RHC group. During the index admission, the RHC group had lower death (25.8% versus 39.5%, P <0.001) and stroke rates (3.1% versus 3.4%, P <0.001). Thirty‐day readmission rates (18.7% versus 19.7%, P =0.04) and death on readmission (7.9% versus 9.3%, P =0.03) were also lower in the RHC group. After adjustment, RHC was associated with lower index admission mortality (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.66–0.72), lower stroke rate (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72–0.90), lower 30‐day readmission (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78–0.88), and higher left ventricular assist device implantations/orthotopic heart transplants (odds ratio, 6.05; 95% CI, 4.43–8.28) during rehospitalization. Results were not meaningfully different after excluding patients with cardiac arrest. Conclusions: RHC use in cardiogenic shock is associated with improved outcomes and increased use of downstream advanced heart failure therapies. Further blinded randomized studies are required to confirm our findings.

Shen Q, et al. Int J Heart Fail. 2021 Jul;3(3):160-171. https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2020.0047

Objective. To determine if non-HDL cholesterol (N-HDL) and directly measured LDL cholesterol (D-LDL) are clinically equivalent measurements. Patients and Methods. Eighty-one subjects recruited for 2 cholesterol treatment studies had at least 1 complete fasting lipid panel and D-LDL performed simultaneously; 64 had a second assessment after 4 to 6 weeks, resulting in 145 triads of C-LDL, D-LDL, and N-HDL. To directly compare N-HDL to D-LDL and C-LDL, we normalized the N-HDL by subtracting 30 from the N-HDL (N-HDL_A). Results. There was significant correlation between N-HDL_A, D-LDL, and C-LDL. Correlation was significantly greater between N-HDL_A and C-LDL than between N-HDL_A and D-LDL. A greater than 20 mg/dL difference between measures was observed more commonly between N-HDL_A and D-LDL, 29%, than between C-LDL and N-HDL_A, 11% (P<0.001), and C-LDL and D-LDL, 17% (P=0.028). Clinical discordance was most common, and concordance was least common between N-HDL and D-LDL. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that N-HDL cholesterol and D-LDL cholesterol are not clinically equivalent and frequently discordant. As N-HDL may be superior to even C-LDL for predicting events in statin-treated patients, utilizing N-HDL to guide therapy would appear to be preferable to D-LDL when C-LDL is inaccurate.

A 32-year-old African American female presented with dyspnea, and after several cardiac diagnostic tests, the diagnosis of an anomalous origin of the RCA from the pulmonary trunk was established by multislice coronary CT angiography. She underwent surgical correction with reimplantation of the RCA, from the pulmonary artery to the aortic root. However, 10 days after surgery, she developed frequent episodes of chest pain, and repeat coronary CTA showed a partially occlusive thrombus in the surgically reimplanted RCA. Anticoagulation with warfarin resulted in complete resolution of the patient’s symptoms.

Cintron SA, et al. Int J Heart Fail. 2023 Sep;5:e22. https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2023.0027