The growing disparity between the demand for donor hearts and their availability has reignited interest in donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation. Historically, DCD heart transplantation has been overshadowed by donation after brain death (DBD) due to ethical and preservation challenges. However, recent advancements in procurement techniques allow for evaluation of the donor heart and enable the broader utilization of DCD donors. While challenges remain, early outcomes suggest comparable survival rates between DCD and DBD heart transplantation. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the historical evolution, current practices, and future directions of DCD heart transplantation. Here, we emphasize its potential to expand the heart donor pool and alleviate the organ shortage crisis.

Background: Immune dysregulation and clinical immunosuppression are biologically plausible contributors to thoracic aortic wall vulnerability through endothelial injury, protease-mediated extracellular matrix remodeling, vascular smooth muscle cell dysfunction, and impaired vascular repair. Yet, the clinical relevance of immunomodulated states to thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) incidence or growth and acute aortic syndromes remains undefined. Methods: This comprehensive review synthesizes clinical and translation evidence linking immunomodulated states in solid organ transplantation, autoimmune disease (predominantly systemic lupus erythematosus), HIV, and oncologic therapies to thoracic aortic dilation, aneurysmal progression, and acute aortic events. Principal Findings: Across transplant, autoimmune, and HIV cohorts, recurring themes include chronic immune dysregulation, endothelial dysfunction, proteolytic matrix remodeling, and impaired vascular repair capacity, although thoracic segment-specific longitudinal growth data remain limited and are often embedded within analyses of multiple vascular beds. In oncologic cohorts, aggregate analyses generally do not demonstrate uniform acceleration of aneurysm growth with malignancy or chemotherapy exposure, although agent-level models suggest that regimen-specific effects may be obscured in pooled estimates. Two studies most directly addressed our question in thoracic-relevant contexts reported (1) very low mean annual ascending aortic aneurysm growth (0.18 ± 0.64 mm/year) with no detectable association with chemotherapy or radiotherapy and (2) prior immunosuppressive/cytostatic chemotherapy exposure to be common in a proximal TAA surgical cohort (39.3%) without a clear difference in thoracic phenotype at presentation or postoperative outcomes. In HIV cohorts, available evidence supports modest but reproducible proximal aortic remodeling and a clinically meaningful aneurysm burden across vascular beds, yet definitive thoracic segment-specific natural history data remain limited. Conclusions: The available literature supports clinical vigilance and exposure-aware surveillance, while suggesting that thoracic aortic risk is unlikely to be uniform across immunosuppressive and cytotoxic therapies. Standardized, segment-specific longitudinal imaging with granular agent-level exposure characterization (dose, duration, sequencing, and combination regimens), consistent definitions of baseline diameter and growth, careful adjustment for key confounders, and prospective ascertainment of dissection/rupture and operative endpoints are needed to translate immunobiology into actionable risk stratification and long-term management strategies.